中學體育教師在素養導向體育課程設計歷程的理解與反思

Secondary School Physical Education Teachers' Understanding and Practical Reflection of Competence-Based Curriculum Design

10.53106/207136492023121603004

陳萩慈(Chiu-Tsu Chen)；掌慶維(Ching-Wei Chang)；李宏盈(Hung-Ying Lee)

逆向式課程設計 ； 教師專業發展 ； 實務社群 ； Backward Design ； Teacher Professional Development ； Community of Practice

師資培育與教師專業發展期刊

16卷3期（2023 / 12 / 01）

27 - 52

繁體中文;英文

十二年國民基本教育所欲培育的核心素養為各學科的重要依據，惟中學體育教師對素養導向課程概念常未能有效與其教學實踐有效連結。依此，本研究運用逆向式課程設計（backward design），採逆向發展的設計與課程校準，引導教師朝向情境化、脈絡化、整合式的學習經驗設計，協助體育教師建立素養導向課程的深入理解概念，作為後續支持中學體育教師專業發展與實踐之參考。本研究選取5位中學體育教師及1位體育師資培育教授為研究對象，組織4次實務社群會議。資料蒐集採半結構式訪談、參與觀察、持續比較和歸納分析資料。結果顯示：一、社群運作初期，教師感到教學與評量間的矛盾，評量仍著重於技能學習；二、社群運作中，教師將目標設定、學習評量以及學習內容來回校準，嘗試化解「既有現場教學經驗」與「探究學習」間的矛盾，但對於素養導向評量概念尚未純熟；三、社群運作結束後，教師給予逆向式課程設計正向的評價，但在教學實踐上仍有挑戰與困難。逆向式的課程設計有利於化解教師對於素養導向在知識概念與教學行動經驗間的衝突，在教師社群共備之下，持續進行專業教學對話與反思，成為素養導向體育教師增能培力之新策略。

The core competencies that 12-year Compulsory Education aims to develop are the basis of the curriculum development for each subject. Competence-based Physical Education (CBPE) curriculum, however, has not yet been popularized and implemented. The purpose of this study was to examine the backward design, and structure of the physical education unit intended to enhance physical education teachers' understanding and practical application of competency-oriented curriculum design. Five secondary school physical education teachers and one physical education teacher education professor was selected for this study, and four learning communities were organized. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, participant observation, continuous comparison, and inductive analysis. Results were as follows: 1. In the initial community, teachers identified a contradiction between teaching and assessment, although assessments still emphasized skill acquisition; 2. During the community operation, teachers worked towards aligning the curriculum with learning objectives, assessment methods, and learning content, aiming to address the tension between "field teaching experience" and "inquiry learning"; however, they were not yet familiar with the CBPE assessment concept; 3. After the community operation, teachers provided positive feedback on the backward design approach, but encountered challenges and difficulties in implementing it during their teaching practice. Through the co-planning mechanism of teacher learning communities, which encourages dialogue and reflection in Physical Education classes, becoming a competence-based physical education teacher becomes a new strategy for enhancing abilities and training.

1. 吳清山, C. S.(2018)。素養導向教師教育內涵建構及實踐之研究。教育科學研究期刊，63(4)，261-293。
   連結：
2. 李宏盈, H. Y.,掌慶維, C. W.(2022)。設計思考對體育師資生學習如何教學之探討。中華體育季刊，36(1)，35-45。
   連結：
3. 林佩璇, P. H.,高翠鴻, T. H.,許燕萍, Y. P.(2016)。差異化教學的矛盾與轉化：活動理論觀。中等教育，67(4)，7-20。
   連結：
4. 張慧琳, H. L.,王金國, C. K.(2019)。UbD 逆向設計結合六層次閱讀認知能力提問教學對國中一年級學生閱讀理解學習成效影響之研究。教育理論與實踐學刊，40，77-105。
   連結：
5. 黃冠達, K. D.,張純, C.,幸曼玲, M. L.(2015)。國小教師參與閱讀理解教學實踐社群與其專業成長之研究。教育研究與發展期刊，11(1)，57-80。
   連結：
6. 楊佩文, P. W.,卯靜儒, C. J.(2015)。教育改革中構築的主體、意義與關係：臺北市跨校教師共同備課之經驗分享。中等教育，66(1)，153-171。
   連結：
7. 詹惠雪, H. H.,黃曰鴻, Y. H.(2020)。教師對素養導向課程設計的理解與實踐反思。課程與教學季刊 ，23(3)，29-58。
   連結：
8. 簡菲莉, F. L.,陳佩英, P. Y.(2018)。一所高中學校轉型之歷程研究：活動理論取徑。教育研究與發展期刊，14(3)，65-100。
   連結：
9. Alison , S.,Thorpe, R(1997).A comparison of the effectiveness of two approaches to teaching games within physical education: A skills approach versus a games for understanding approach.The British Journal of Physical Education,28(3),9-13.
10. Biggs, J.(1996).Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment.Higher Education,32(3),347-364.
11. Blankenship, S. S.,Ruona, W. E. A.(2007).Professional learning communities and communities of practice: A comparison of models.AHRD 2007 International Conference Proceeding
12. Brown, J. S.,Collins, A.,Duguid, P.(1989).Situated cognition and the culture of learning.Educational Researcher,18(1),32-42.
13. Cohen, S. A.(1987).Instructional alignment: Searching for a magic bullet.Educational Researcher,16(8),16-20.
14. Cothran, D. J.(2016).Designing effective programs: Creating curriculum to enhance student learning.Routledge handbook of physical education pedagogies
15. Erickson, H. L.,Lanning, L. A.,French, R. L.(2017).Concept-based curriculum and instruction for the thinking classroom.Corwin Press.
16. Lave, J.,Wenger, E.(1991).Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation.Cambridge University Press.
17. López-Pastor, V. M.,Kirk, D.,Lorente Catalán, E.,MacPhail, A ,Macdonald, D.(2013).Alternative assessment in physical education: A review of international literature.Sport, Education and Society,18(1),57-76.
18. Lund, J.(Ed.),Tannehill, D.(Ed.)(2014).Standards based physical education curriculum development.Jones and Bartlett.
19. MacPhail, A.,Halber t, J(2010).We had to do intelligent thinking during recent PE: Students’and teachers’experiences of assessment fo rlearning in post-primary physical education.Assessment in Education,17(1),23-39.
20. MacPhail, A.,Patton, K.,Parker, M.,Tannehill, D.(2014).Leading by example: Teacher educators’professional learning through communities of practice.Quest,66(1),39-56.
21. MacPhail, A.,Tannehill, D.,Leirhaug, P. E.,Borghouts, L.(2021).Promoting instructional alignment in physical education teacher education.Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy,28(2),153-164.
22. McTighe、 J.,Wiggins, G.,侯秋玲（譯）, C. H.(Trans.),吳敏而（譯）, R. J.(Trans.)(2016).核心問題：開啟學生理解之門.心理出版社=Psychological Publishing.
23. Mitchell, S. A.,Griffin, L. L.,Oslin, J. L.(1997).Teaching invasion games: A comparison of two instructional approaches.Teaching and Coach in Physical Education and Sports,3(2),56-69.
24. Mitchell, S. A.,Griffin, L. L.,Oslin, J. L.(1995).An analysis of two instructional approaches to teaching invasion games.Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport,66,31-65.
25. Oliver, K.,Kirk, D.(2016).Transformative pedagogies for challenging body culture in physical education.Routledge Handbook of Physical Education Pedagogies
26. Parker, M.,Patton, K.,Gonçalves, L.,Luguetti, C.,Lee, O.(2022).Learning communities and physical education professional development: A scoping review.European Physical Education Review,28(2),500-518.
27. Patton, K.,Parker, M.(2017).Teacher education communities of practice: More than a culture of collaboration.Teaching and Teacher Education,67(1),351-360.
28. Redelius, K.,Quennerstedt, M.,Öhman, M.(2015).Communicating aims and learning goals in physical education: Part of a subject for learning?.Sport, Education and Society,20(5),641-655.
29. Scanlon, D.,MacPhail, A.,Walsh, C.,Tan nehill, D.(2022).Embedding assessment in learning experiences: Enacting the principles of instructional alignment in physical education teacher education.Curriculum Studies in Health and Physical Education,14(1),3-20.
30. Silverman, S.(Ed.),Ennis, C.(Ed.)(1996).Student learning in physical education: Applying research to enhance instruction.Human Kinetics.
31. Strauss, A.,Corbin, J.(1998).Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory.SAGE.
32. Tannehill, D.,Van der Mars, H.,MacPhail, A.(2015).Building effective physical education programs.Jones and Bartlett Learning.
33. Thompson, S. C.,Gregg, L.,Niska, J. M.(2004).Professional learning communities, leadership, and student learning.Research in Middle Level Education Online,28(1),1-15.
34. Wenger, E.(1998).Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity.Cambridge University Press.
35. Wiggins, G.,McTighe, J.(1998).Understanding by design.Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
36. Wiggins, G.,McTighe, J.(2005).Understanding by design.Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
37. Wiggins、 G.,McTighe, J.,賴麗珍（譯）, L. C.(Trans.)(2015).設計優質的課程單元─重理解的設計法指南.心理出版社=Psychological Publishing.
38. 佐藤豊(2014)。単元構造図を活用して指導計画を作成する。中学保健体育科ニュース，12
39. 呂秀蓮, H. L.(2017).課綱使用的理論與實例：課綱為本課程設.大衛營文化=Camp David Culture Publishing.
40. 周宏室（編）, S. H.(Ed.)(2005).運動教育學的課程理論.師大書苑=Shtabook.
41. 教育部（2018）。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。教育部。[Ministry of Education. (2018). Curriculum guidelines of 12 year basic education General guidelines. Minist r y of Education.]
42. 許義雄, I. H.(2020).走出體育的迷宮.師大書苑=Shtabook.
43. 陳佩英, P. Y.(2018)。跨領域素養導向課程設計工作坊之構思與實踐。課程研究，13(2)，21-42。
44. 掌慶維, C. W.(2018)。素養導向體育教學之理論基礎。學校體育，168，38-48。
45. 掌慶維, C. W.(2021).素養導向職前體育師資培育課程與教學─理念與實務.國立臺灣師範大學=National Taiwan Normal University Press.
46. 潘淑滿, S. M.(2003).質性研究：理論與應用.心理出版社=Psychological Publishing.