科學想像力圖形測驗之發展

Development of the Scientific Imagination Test-Figural

10.6209/JORIES.2016.61(4).07

王佳琪(Chia-Chi Wang)；鄭英耀(Ying-Yao Cheng)；何曉琪(Hsiao-Chi Ho)

科學想像力圖形測驗 ； 科學想像力歷程 ； Rasch部分給分模式 ； Rasch partial credit model ； scientific imagination process ； Scientific Imagination Test-Figural

教育科學研究期刊

61卷4期（2016 / 12 / 01）

177 - 204

繁體中文

本研究旨在科學想像力歷程模式的基礎下，發展適用於國小五、六年級的科學想像力圖形測驗。研究對象包含預試樣本558 位學生，正式樣本698 位學生。本測驗共有A、B、C、D 四項作業，每項作業均包含科學想像力歷程中的漫想力、聯想力、奇想力等三個向度，用以測量學生之科學想像力。經以Rasch部分給分模式分析，三向度的量表具有良好的模式資料適配度。所有的作業在男、女學生並無明顯的差異試題功能，且漫想力、聯想力、奇想力之信度分別是 .88、 .88 以及 .87。最後，本研究針對「科學想像力圖形測驗」的發展與應用，提出未來研究之建議。

This study developed the Scientific Imagination Test-Figural (SIT-Figural) for 5th and 6th graders on the basis of the scientific imagination process. A total of 1,256 students who completed the SIT-Figural constituted Sample 1 (n = 558) and Sample 2 (n = 698). The SIT-Figural, which was designed to measure the students' scientific imagination, comprised four tasks, A, B, C, and D–which covered three dimensions of the scientific imagination process, namely brainstorming, association, and transformation (or elaboration). The Rasch partial credit model was used to assess the model–data fit. A differential item functioning analysis was conducted to assess the consistency of the ratings provided by male and female students. The results revealed that the three dimensions of the SIT-Figural exhibited an acceptable model–data fit. The three subtests had person separate reliabilities of .88, .88, and .87. Finally, suggestions for future revisions and applications of the SIT-Figural have been proposed in this paper.

1. 王依仁、葉忠達、江怡瑩(2012)。國小六年級學童的繪畫創作想像力研究。藝術教育研究，23，105-134。
   連結：
2. 王佳琪、何曉琪、鄭英耀(2014)。「科學創造性問題解決測驗」之發展。測驗學刊，61(3)，337-360。
   連結：
3. 王佳琪、鄭英耀、劉昆夏、何曉琪(2011)。以Rasch 分析檢驗「多向度幽默感量表」之信效度。測驗學刊，58(4)，691-713。
   連結：
4. 巫博瀚、賴英娟、施慶麟(2013)。「Rosenberg自尊量表」之試題衡鑑：評等量尺模型的應用。測驗學刊，60(2)，263-289。
   連結：
5. 林怡君、張麗麗、陸怡琮(2013)。Rasch 模式建置國小高年級閱讀理解測驗。教育心理學報，45(1)，39-61。
   連結：
6. 張貴琳(2013)。青少年線上閱讀素養評量工具之發展。教育實踐與研究，26(2)，29-66。
   連結：
7. 梁朝雲、許育齡、林威聖(2014)。探究想像力內涵暨評測量表研發。測驗學刊，61(1)，27-50。
   連結：
8. 許育齡、梁朝雲、林志成(2013)。教師發揮教學設計想像力的心理與環境因素探究。當代教育研究季刊，21(2)，113-148。
   連結：
9. 趙子揚、黃嘉莉、宋曜廷、郭蕙寧、許明輝(2016)。教師情境判斷測驗之編製。教育科學研究期刊，61(2)，85-117。
   連結：
10. 趙小瑩、王文中、葉寶專(2007)。正負向情感及身體激起量表之發展與試題反應分析：焦慮症與憂鬱症三角模式的再探討。測驗學刊，54(1)，223-258。
    連結：
11. 劉昆夏、鄭英耀、王文中(2010)。創意產品共識評量之信、效度析論。測驗學刊，57(1)，59-84。
    連結：
12. 鄭英耀、葉麗貞、劉昆夏、莫慕貞(2011)。大學生基本能力指標之建構。測驗學刊，58(3)，531-558。
    連結：
13. 謝如山、謝名娟(2013)。多層面Rasch 模式在數學實作評量的應用。教育心理學報，45(1)，1-18。
    連結：
14. Wu, M. L., Adams, R. J., & Wilson, M. R. (2007). ConQuest [Computer software and manual]. Camberwell, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research..
15. The Next Generation Science Standards. (2013). Appendix H–Understanding the scientific enterprise: The nature of science in the next generation science standards. Retrieved from http://www.nextgenscience.org/sites/ngss/files/Appendix%20H%20-%20The%20Nature%20of%20Science%20in%20the%20Next%20Generation%20Science%20Standards%204.15.13.pdf
16. Abraham, A.,Thybusch, K.,Pieritz, K.,Hermann, C.(2014).Gender differences in creative thinking: Behavioral and fMRI findings.Brain Imaging and Behavior,8(1),39-51.
17. Adams, R. J.,Wilson, M. R.,Wang, W.-C.(1997).The multidimensional random coefficients multinomial logit model.Applied Psychological Measurement,21(1),1-23.
18. Baer, J.,Kaufman, J. C.(2008).Gender differences in creativity.The Journal of Creative Behavior,42(2),75-105.
19. Bond, T. G.,Fox, C. M.(2007).Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences.Mahwah, NJ:LEA.
20. Campbell, K. H. S.,Mcwhir, J.,Ritchie, W. A.,Wilmut, I.(1996).Sheep cloned by nuclear transfer from a cultured cell line.Nature,380,64-66.
21. Cheng, Y.-Y.,Wang, W.-C.,Ho, Y.-H.(2009).Multidimensional Rasch analysis of a psychological test with multiple subtests: A statistical solution for the bandwidth-fidelity dilemma.Educational and Psychological Measurement,69(3),369-388.
22. Cruz, H. D.,Smedt, J. D.(2010).Science as structured imagination.Journal of Creative Behavior,44(1),37-52.
23. DeMoss, K.,Milich, R.,DeMers, S.(1993).Gender, creativity, depression, and attributional style in adolescents with high academic ability.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology,21(4),455-467.
24. Eckhoff, A.,Urbach, J.(2008).Understanding imaginative thinking during childhood: Sociocultural conceptions of creativity and imaginative thought.Early Childhood Education Journal,36(2),179-185.
25. Finke, R. A.,Slayton, K.(1988).Explorations of creative visual synthesis in mental imagery.Memory & Cognition,16(3),252-257.
26. Hadzigeorgiou, Y.,Stefanich, G.(2000).Imagination in science education.Contemporary Education,71(4),23-28.
27. Ho, H.-C.,Wang, C.-C.,Cheng, Y.-Y.(2013).Analysis of the scientific imagination process.Thinking Skills and Creativity,10,68-78.
28. Holland, P. W.(Ed.),Wainer, H.(Ed.)(1993).Differential item functioning.Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
29. Jankowska, D. M.,Karwowski, M.(2015).Measuring creative imagery abilities.Frontiers in Psychology,6,1591.
30. LeBoutillier, N.,Marks, D. F.(2003).Mental imagery and creativity: A meta-analytic review study.British Journal of Psychology,94(1),29-44.
31. Linacre, J. M.(1998).Thurstone thresholds and the Rasch model.Rasch Measurement Transactions,12(2),634-635.
32. Masters, G. N.(1982).A Rasch model for partial credit scoring.Psychometrika,47(2),149-174.
33. Mayer, R. E.、林清山譯(1990)。教育心理學─認知取向。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:遠流=Yuan-Liou。
34. McCormack, A.(2010).Imagine and invent: Create a great future.Journal of College Science Teaching,40(1),8-9.
35. Miles, M. B.,Huberman, A. M.(1994).Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
36. Osborn, A. F.(1953).Applied imagination.New York, NY:Charles Scribner's Sons.
37. Pendry, J. B.,Schurig, D.,Smith, D. R.(2006).Controlling electromagnetic fields.Science,312(5781),1780-1782.
38. Raju, N. S.,Price, L. R.,Oshima, T. C.,Nering, M. L.(2007).Standardized conditional SEM: A case for conditional reliability.Applied Psychological Measurement,31(3),169-180.
39. Rasch, G.(1960).Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests.Copenhagen, Denmark:Danish Institute for Educational Research.
40. Razumnikova, O. M.(2004).Gender differences in hemispheric organization during divergent thinking: An EEG investigation in human subjects.Neuroscience Letters,362(3),193-195.
41. Ren, F.,Li, X.,Zhang, H.,Wang, L.(2012).Progression of Chinese students' creative imagination from elementary through high school.International Journal of Science Education,34(13),2043-2059.
42. Robinson, A.(2010).Chemistry's visual origins-Vivid imagination was key to unlocking the secrets of molecular structure in the nineteenth century.Nature,465,36.
43. Sternberg, R. J. Ed.、李乙明譯、李淑貞譯(2005)。創造力I．理論。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:五南=Wu-Nan Book。
44. Sternberg, R. J.,Williams, W. M.(1996).How to develop student creativity.Alexandria, VA:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
45. Vygotsky, S. L.(2004).Imagination and creativity in childhood.Journal of Russian and East European Psychology,42(1),7-97.
46. Wang, C.-C.,Ho, H.-C.,Cheng, C.-L.,Cheng, Y.-Y.(2014).Application of the Rasch model to the measurement of creativity: The creative achievement questionnaire.Creativity Research Journal,26(1),62-71.
47. Wang, C.-C.,Ho, H.-C.,Cheng, Y.-Y.(2015).Building a learning progression for scientific imagination: A measurement approach.Thinking Skills and Creativity,17,1-14.
48. Wang, C.-C.,Ho, H.-C.,Wu, J.-J.,Cheng, Y.-Y.(2014).Development of the scientific imagination model: A concept-mapping perspective.Thinking Skills and Creativity,13,106-119.
49. Wang, W.-C.(2008).Assessment of differential item functioning.Journal of Applied Measurement,9(4),1-22.
50. Ward, T. B.(1994).Structured imagination: The role of category structure in exemplar generation.Cognitive Psychology,27(1),1-40.
51. Wilson, M.(2009).Measuring processions: Assessment structures underlying a learning progression.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,46(6),716-730.
52. Wilson, M.(2005).Constructing measures: An item response modeling approach.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
53. Wolfe, E. W.,Smith, E. V., Jr.(2007).Understanding Rasch measurement: Instrument development tools and activities for measure validation using Rasch models: Part II-Validation activities.Journal of Applied Measurement,8(2),204-233.
54. Wood, K. D.,Endres, C.(2004).Motivating student interest with the imagine, elaborate, predict, and confirm (IEPC) strategy.The Reading Teacher,58(4),346-357.
55. Zabriskie, B.(2004).Imagination as laboratory.Journal of Analytical Psychology,49(2),235-242.
56. Zarnowski, M.(2009).The thought experiment: An imaginative way into civic literacy.Social Studies,100(2),55-62.
57. 王文中(2004)。Rasch 測量理論與其在教育和心理之應用。教育與心理研究，27(4)，637-694。
58. 吳靜吉、郭俊賢、林偉文、劉士豪、陳玉樺(1998)。教育部輔導工作六年計畫研究報告教育部輔導工作六年計畫研究報告,臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:教育部=Ministry of Education。

1. 黃金俊(2020)。高職學生攝影想像力量表之編製。藝術教育研究，40，75-115。
2. 王佳琪(2020)。科學想像力圖形測驗之驗證。教育心理學報，51(3)，341-367。
3. 楊棨棠,王佳琪(2019)。探討科學想像力融入國小自然科課程單元之成效：以「簡單力學－力與運動」單元為例。教育科學研究期刊，64(1)，213-240。
4. (2020)。科學想像力歷程模式融入工程教育課程之教學效果。靜宜人文社會學報，14(1)，109-134。