题名

對話即實踐:網絡學習社群專業資本積累之個案研究

并列篇名

Dialogue as Practice: A Case Study on the Accumulation of Professional Capital by the Networked Learning Communities

DOI

10.6209/JORIES.2017.62(3).06

作者

陳佩英(Pei-Ying Chen)

关键词

專業資本 ; 對話即實踐 ; 網絡學習社群 ; dialogue as practice ; networked learning communities ; professional capital

期刊名称

教育科學研究期刊

卷期/出版年月

62卷3期(2017 / 09 / 01)

页次

159 - 191

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本研究旨在探究網絡學習社群之教學探究活動及其專業資本積累之實踐路徑與意義。履行者個案由七位臺北市立六所公立高中的國文教師組成。本研究為期2年,資料蒐集包含深度訪談與焦點訪談、觀察紀錄、問卷與文件分析等。本研究結合網絡學習社群、專業資本與對話即實踐之概念,以之深描與詮釋該社群之發展歷程與專業資本累積之關聯。研究結果除了說明國內網絡學習社群的發展脈絡,也討論了履行者成員投入跨校社群的理由、在實踐中形塑社群主體、善用社群媒體平台打破時空限制、透過教學探究的文本生成循環而使得專業資本得以積累,以及跨校社群的網絡擴散和未來發展。社群成員因理念相通而集結,當成員參與備課-觀課-議課之時,便是創造第三空間的集體探究活動。跨校社群經由集體活動中的言談與文本的生成循環,漸漸形成跨文本的理解,共享的優勢言談可以穿越學校城牆與教室,形成具備公共議題的敘事文本,並於教學文本的生成循環中進行探討和反思,繼而共創教育價值並賦予課程與教學新的實踐意義。

英文摘要

This research explored the pedagogical inquiry activities of the networked learning communities (NLCs), and the path and meaning of its professional empowerment. The case study focused on a group of teachers named the "Navigators," comprised of seven Chinese Literacy teachers from six public high schools in Taipei. This study lasted 2 years and data collection included in-depth interviews, focus group interviews, field observation, and document analysis. The concepts of NLCs, professional capital, and dialogue as practice were employed to provide thick description and a thorough interpretation of the processes and changes involved in the NLCs. The results explain the context in which the NLCs originated, the drivers of participation, how agency was developed through collaboration, the use of social media for constraint-free communication, the use of professional enquiry and reconstructed lesson texts for accumulation of professional capital, and the network expansion that led to further development of new NLCs. When participants gathered for meetings and held discussions regarding lesson plans and instructional observation, they created a "third space" for collective inquiry. Through cycles of professional dialogue and the recurrent production of lesson texts, a shared pedagogy was strengthened that guided professional discourse and enabled common understanding. This discourse was then continued within the teachers' respective schools to form a public narrative on educational practices. Along the process of recurrent production of talks and texts then practiced collaborative inquiry and reflection. This, in turn, shaped educational values and empowered the Navigators to be innovative with their curriculum and instruction.

主题分类 社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. 林智中、張爽(2013)。香港高中課程改革:通識教育科的人力成本。課程與教學季刊,16(1),159-178。
    連結:
  2. 陳佩英(2009)。一起學習、一起領導:專業學習社群的建構與實踐。中等教育,60(3),68-88。
    連結:
  3. 陳佩英(2015)。結構縫隙、社群結連與教育學想像的實踐。中等教育,66(1),58-78。
    連結:
  4. 陳佩英、焦傳金(2009)。分散式領導與專業學習社群之建構:一所高中教學創新計畫的個案研究。教育科學研究期刊,54(1),55-86。
    連結:
  5. 楊佩文、卯靜儒(2015)。教育改革中構築的主體、意義與關係:臺北市跨校教師共同備課之經驗分享。中等教育,66(1),153-171。
    連結:
  6. 薛雅慈曉華(2014)。國中教師以學習共同體啟動:新學習型態之研究。教育科學研究期刊,59(1),101-140。
    連結:
  7. Network Learning Conference. (2017). NLC 2016: Looking back-moving forward. Retrieved from http://www.lancaster.ac.uk/fss/organisations/netlc/index.htm
  8. Borgatti, S.,Foster, P.(2003).The network paradigm in organizational research: A review and typology.Journal of Management,29(6),991-1013.
  9. Chen, P.-Y.,Lee, C.-D.,Lin, H.,Chang, C.-X.(2016).Factors that develop effective professional learning communities in Taiwan.Asia Pacific Journal of Education,36(2),248-265.
  10. Church, M.,Bitel, M.,Armstrong, K.,Fernando, P.,Gould, H.,Joss, S.,Vouhe, C.(2003).Participation, relationships and dynamic change: New thinking on evaluating the work of international networks.London, UK:University College London.
  11. Dudley, P.(2013).Teacher learning in lesson study: What interaction-level discourse analysis revealed about how teachers utilised imagination, tacit knowledge of teaching and fresh evidence of pupils learning, to develop practice knowledge and so enhance their pupils' learning.Teaching and Teacher Education,34,107-121.
  12. Earl, L.,Katz, S.(2005).Painting a data-rich picture.Principal Leadership,5(5),16-20.
  13. Fairhurst, G. L.,Putnam, L.(2004).Organizations as discursive constructions.Communication Theory,14(1),5-26.
  14. Fullan, M.(2007).The new meaning of educational change.New York, NY:Teachers College Press.
  15. Gutiérrez, K. D.,Baquedano‐López, P.,Tejeda, C.(1999).Rethinking diversity: Hybridity and hybrid language practices in the third space.Mind, Culture, and Activity,6(4),286-303.
  16. Hargreaves, A.(2003).Teaching in the knowledge society: Education in the age of insecurity.New York, NY:Teachers College Press.
  17. Hargreaves, A.,Fullan, M.(2012).Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school.New York, NY:Teachers College Press.
  18. Hargreaves, A.,Shirley, D.(2009).The fourth way: The inspiring future for educational change.Thousand Oaks, CA:Corwin Press.
  19. Harris, A.(Ed.),Jones, M.(Ed.),Huffman, B. J.(Ed.)(2017).Teachers leading educational reform: The power of professional learning communities.London, UK:Routledge.
  20. Jackson, D.,Cordingley, P.,Hannon, V.(2004).Networked learning communities: Programme, policy environment and the potential of participatory evaluation.AERA annual conference,San Diego, CA.:
  21. Jordan, J. J.,Rand, D. G.,Arbesman, S.,Fowler, J. H.,Christakis, N. A.(2013).Contagion of cooperation in static and fluid social networks.PloS One,8(3),1-10.
  22. Kahne, J.,O'Brien, J.,Brown, A.,Quinn, T.(2001).Leveraging social capital and school improvement: The case of a school network and a comprehensive community initiative in Chicago.Educational Administration Quarterly,37(4),429-461.
  23. Kuhn, T.(2008).A communicative theory of the firm: Developing an alternative perspective on intra-organizational power and stakeholder relationships.Organization Studies,29(8-9),1227- 1254.
  24. Lieberman, A.,Wood, D.(2002).Untangling the threads: Networks, community and teacher learning in the national writing project.Teachers and Teaching,8(3),295-302.
  25. Lin, N.(2001).Social capital: A theory of social structure and action.New York, NY:Cambridge University Press.
  26. Little, J. W.(2005).Nodes and nets: Investigating resources for professional learning in schools and networks.Berkeley, CA:University of California, Berkeley..
  27. McCormick, R.,Fox, A.,Carmichael, P.,Procter, R.(2011).Researching and understanding educational networks.London, UK:Routledge.
  28. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development(2003).Networks of innovation: Towards new models for managing schools and systems.Paris, France:Author.
  29. Ricoeur, P.,Thompson, J. B.(Ed. Trans.)(1981).Hermeneutics and the human sciences: Essays on language, action and interpretation.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
  30. Robichaud, D.,Giroux, H.,Taylor, J. R.(2004).The metaconversation: The recursive property of language as a key to organizing.Academy of Management Review,29(4),617-634.
  31. Spee, A. P.,Jarzabkowski, P.(2011).Strategic planning as communicative process.Organization Studies,32(9),1217-1245.
  32. Stoll, L.(2004).Networked learning communities as professional learning communities.Aporia Consulting Ltd for Phase 1 of Evaluation of Networked Learning Communities Program Network Learning Communities Seminar,San Diego, CA.:
  33. Stoll, L.(Ed.),Louis, K. S.(Ed.)(2006).Professional learning communities: Divergence, depth and dilemmas.Berkshire, UK:Open University Press.
  34. Surman, M.,Surman, T.(2008).Listening to the stars: The constellation model of collaborative social change.Social Space,24-29.
  35. Taylor, C.(2003).Modern social imaginaries.Durham, NC:Duke University Press.
  36. Taylor, J. R.,Robichaud, D.(2004).Finding the organization in the communication: Discourse as action and sensemaking.Organization,11(3),395-413.
  37. Taylor, J. R.,Van Every, E. J.(1999).The emergent organization: Communication as its site and surface.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  38. Thaler, R. H.,Sunstein, C. R.(2008).Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness.New Haven, CT:Yale University Press.
  39. Veugelers, W.(Ed.),O'Hair, M. J.(Ed.)(2005).Network learning for educational change.London, UK:Open University Press.
  40. Wohlstetter, P.,Malloy, C. L.,Chau, D.,Polhemus, J. L.(2003).Improving schools through networks: A new approach to urban school reform.Educational Policy,17(4),399-430.
  41. 李文富(2012)。宜蘭高中普通高中課程課務工作圈委託研究成果報告宜蘭高中普通高中課程課務工作圈委託研究成果報告,宜蘭縣=Yilan County, Taiwan:國立宜蘭高級中學=National Yilan Senior High School。
  42. 阮孝齊(2016)。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan,國立臺灣師範大學=National Taiwan Normal University。
  43. 張素貞、吳俊傑(2011)。從「深耕」到「精進」-九年一貫課程與教學輔導機制之推動。教育資料與研究,98,101-124。
  44. 陳佩英、鄭美瑜、黃琪、鄭毓瓊、林雅婷(2016)。教育學想像的促能:跨校網絡學習社群與校本學習社群的共享願景實踐。教育研究月刊,265,91-109。
  45. 陳麗華(2011)。促進全員潛能開發的學習共同體。教師天地,171,76-77。
  46. 趙志成、何碧愉、李文浩(2013)。學校改進:理論與實踐。香港=Hong Kong, China:香港中文大學香港教育研究所=Hong Kong Institute of Education Research, the Chinese University of Hong Kong。
  47. 潘慧玲、陳佩英、張素貞、鄭淑惠、陳文彥(2014)。從學習領導論析學習共同體的概念與實踐。市北教育學刊,45,1-28。
被引用次数
  1. 鄭章華(Chang-Hua Chen);林佳慧(Chia-Hui Lin);蔡曉楓(Hsiao-Feng Tsai)(2021)。發展以教師對話為取向之數學課堂教學研究分析架構。教育研究與發展期刊。17(3)。1-39。 
  2. 潘慧玲(Hui-Ling Wendy Pan);洪瑞璇(Jui-Hsuan Hung)(2022)。校長在學習領導踐行中的資本運用與建構:以推動學習共同體為例。教育科學研究期刊。67(1)。159-191。