题名

學習情境中的個人成就目標與作弊接受度之關係:以學業自我效能為調節變項

并列篇名

Personal Achievement Goals and the Acceptability of Cheating in an Academic Context: The Moderating Role of Academic Self-Efficacy

DOI

10.6209/JORIES.201912_64(4).0004

作者

彭淑玲(Shu-Ling Peng);黃博聖(Po-Sheng Huang);陳學志(Hsueh-Chih Chen)

关键词

作弊接受度 ; 個人成就目標 ; 學業自我效能 ; academic self-efficacy ; acceptability of academic cheating ; personal achievement goals

期刊名称

教育科學研究期刊

卷期/出版年月

64卷4期(2019 / 12 / 01)

页次

87 - 113

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本研究從動機觀點切入,採用個人成就目標與學業自我效能理論瞭解動機變項及兩種作弊接受度(學業作弊、被動作弊)之關係。據此,本研究目的為:一、瞭解國中生對兩種作弊行為的接受程度現況;二、探討個人成就目標與兩種作弊接受度之關係;三、考驗學業自我效能在上述關係中的調節效果。為達成上述目的,本研究抽取938位七至九年級國中生進行施測,並以數學科為領域,蒐集資料以結構方程模式進行分析。研究結果發現:一、男生對兩種作弊行為的接受度均略高於女生;八、九年級學生對兩種作弊行為的接受度略大於七年級學生;二、個人成就目標能預測兩種作弊接受度,其中趨向精熟目標能降低學生對兩種作弊行為的接受度,逃避表現目標則與上述結果相反,而趨向表現目標僅能正向預測被動作弊接受度;三、學業自我效能會調節個人成就目標與作弊接受度之關係:當學習者知覺有高學業自我效能時,逃避表現目標無法預測兩種作弊接受度;當學習者知覺為低學業自我效能時,會提升逃避表現目標對兩種作弊接受度的正向預測力。本研究依據研究結果提出建議,以作為國中教學輔導與未來研究之參考。

英文摘要

This study was conducted on the basis of motivation theories and adopted theoretical concepts from achievement goal theory and self-efficacy to explore the motivational variables related to the acceptability of two types of cheating behaviors, namely academic cheating and passive cheating, among Taiwanese junior high school students in the subject of mathematics. The aims of the study were threefold: first, to understand the degree of acceptability of the two types of cheating behaviors among Taiwanese students; second, to investigate the relationships between personal achievement goals and the acceptability of the two types of cheating; and third, to test whether these relationships are moderated by academic self-efficacy. Nine hundred thirty-eight seventh-to-ninth-grade Taiwanese students (473 boys; 23 missing values) participated in the survey, and the researchers applied the technique of structural equation modeling for data analysis. The results indicated that boys were slightly more accepting of the two types of cheating behaviors than girls, and eighth- and ninth-grade students, regardless of gender, were more accepting of both cheating behaviors than seventh-grade students. Moreover, it was found that personal achievement goals can effectively predict the two types of cheating behaviors, which can be negatively predicted by mastery-approach goals and positively predicted by performance-avoidance goals. In particular, performance-approach goals only positively predicted individuals' acceptance of passive cheating. Finally, it was revealed that academic self-efficacy moderates the relationship between personal achievement goals and individuals' acceptance of cheating behaviors. Specifically, a high level of academic self-efficacy perceived by individuals was associated with a decrease in the negative predictive power of students' adoption of performance-avoidance goals with respect to the acceptability of both cheating behaviors. A low level of academic self-efficacy perceived by individuals was associated with an increase in the negative predictive power of students' adoption of performance-avoidance goals with respect to the acceptability of both cheating behaviors. Based on the findings, relevant recommendations are proposed as a reference for further research, teaching practices, and junior high school counseling.

主题分类 社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. 吳志明, C.-M.,余國瑋, K.-W.,李賜郎, S.-L.(2007)。學生作弊行為因素結構模式之研究─以商學院學生為實證。企業管理學報,73,63-74。
    連結:
  2. 張楓明, F.-M.,譚子文, T.-W.(2012)。學業控制因素、學業自我效能及學業緊張因素與國中生初次作弊行為之關聯性分析。教育研究集刊,58(4),51-89。
    連結:
  3. 彭淑玲, S.-L.(2019)。知覺教師回饋、個人成就目標、學業自我效能與無聊之關係:中介效果與條件間接化效果分析。教育心理學報,51(1),83-108。
    連結:
  4. 彭淑玲, S.-L.,王佩琪, P.-C.,林宏泰, H.-T.(2017)。你求助嗎?個人目標導向與適應/非適應課業求助/避助行為之關係。教育心理學報,49(2),267-293。
    連結:
  5. 程炳林, B.-L.(2003)。四向度目標導向模式之研究。師大學報,48(1),15-40。
    連結:
  6. 譚華德, N.,郝永崴, Y.-W.,黃明月, M.-Y.(2019)。泰文學習拼字系統之創新教學:泰語學習自我效能、學習興趣、學習焦慮及學業成就之相關研究。教育科學研究期刊,64(3),1-29。
    連結:
  7. Alt, D.,Geiger, B.(2012).Goal orientations and tendency to neutralize academic cheating: An ecological perspective.Psychological Studies,57(4),404-416.
  8. Ames, C.(1992).Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation.Journal of Educational Psychology,84(3),261-271.
  9. Ames, C.,Archer, J.(1988).Achievement goals in the classroom: Student’s learning strategies and motivation process.Journal of Educational Psychology,80(3),260-267.
  10. Anderman, E. M.(2007).The effects of personal, classroom, and school goal structures on academic cheating.Psychology of academic cheating,Burlington, MA:
  11. Anderman, E. M.,Griesinger, T.,Westerfield, G.(1998).Motivation and cheating during early adolescence.Journal of Educational Psychology,90(1),84-93.
  12. Anderman, E. M.,Koenka, A. C.(2017).The relation between academic motivation and cheating.Theory Into Practice,56(2),95-102.
  13. Anderman, E. M.,Midgley, C.(2004).Changes in self-reported academic cheating across the transition from middle school to high school.Contemporary Educational Psychology,29(4),499-517.
  14. Anderman, E. M.,Murdock, T. B.(2007).The psychology of academic cheating.Psychology of academic cheating,Burlington, MA:
  15. Bandalos, D. L.(2002).The effects of item parceling on goodness-of-fit and parameter estimate bias in structural equation modeling.Structural Equation Modeling,9(1),78-102.
  16. Bandura, A.(1997).Self-efficacy: The exercise of control.New York, NY:Freeman.
  17. Barzegar, K.,Khezri, H.(2012).Predicting academic cheating among the fifth grade students: Role of self-efficacy and academic self-handicapping.Journal of Life Science and Biomedicine,2(1),1-6.
  18. Bloodgood, J. M.,Turnley, W. H.,Mudrack, P. E.(2010).Ethics instruction and the perceived acceptability of cheating.Journal of Business Ethics,95(1),23-37.
  19. Bollen, K. A.(1989).Structural equations with latent variables.New York, NY:John Wiley & Sons.
  20. Bong, M.(2008).Effects of parent-child relationships and classroom goal structures on motivations, help-seeking avoidance, and cheating.The Journal of Experiment Education,76(2),191-217.
  21. Braten, I.,Samuelstuen, M. S.,Strømsø, H. I.(2004).Do students’ self-efficacy beliefs moderate the effects of performance goals on self-regulatory strategy use?.Educational Psychology,24(2),231-247.
  22. Calabrese, R. L.,Cochran, J. T.(1990).The relationship of alienation to cheating among a sample of American adolescents.Journal of Research & Development in Education,23(2),65-72.
  23. Cizek, G. J.(1999).Cheating on tests: How to do it, detect it and prevent it.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  24. Cohen, J.(1988).Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences.Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  25. Corrion, K.,D’Arripe-Longueville, F.,Chalabaev, A.,Schiano-Lomoriello, S.,Roussel, P.,Cury, F.(2010).Effect of implicit theories on judgment of cheating acceptability in physical education: The mediating role of achievement goals.Journal of Sports Sciences,28(8),909-919.
  26. Crown, D. F.,Spiller, M. S.(1998).Learning from the literature on collegiate cheating: A review of empirical research.Journal of Business Ethics,17(6),683-700.
  27. de Bruin, G. P.,Rudnick, H.(2007).Examining the cheats: The role conscientiousness and excitement seeking in academic dishonesty.South African Journal of Psychology,37(1),153-164.
  28. Diamantopoulos, A.,Siguaw, J. A.(2000).Introducing LISREL: A guide for the uninitiated.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
  29. Elliot, A. J.(1999).Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals.Educational Psychologist,34(3),169-189.
  30. Elliott, E. S.,Dweck, C. S.(1988).Goals: An approach to motivation and achievement.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,54(1),5-12.
  31. Finn, K. V.,Frone, M. R.(2004).Academic performance and cheating: Moderating role of school identification and self-efficacy.The Journal of Educational Research,97(3),115-121.
  32. Garavalia, L.,Olson, E.,Russell, E.,Christensen, L.(2007).How do students cheat?.Psychology of academic cheating,Burlington, MA:
  33. Hair, J. F., Jr.,Anderson, R. E.,Tatham, R. L.,Black, W. C.(1998).Multivariate data analysis.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
  34. Jensen, L. A.,Arnett, J. J.,Feldman, S. S.,Cauffman, E.(2002).It’s wrong, but everybody does it: Academic dishonesty among high school and college students.Contemporary Educational Psychology,27(2),209-228.
  35. Jöreskog, K. G.,Sörbom, D.(2001).Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (2001). LISREL (Version 8.51) [Computer software]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International..
  36. Kline, R. B.(1998).Structural equation modeling.New York, NY:The Guilford Press.
  37. Lim, V. K. G.,See, S. K. B.(2001).Attitudes toward and intentions to report, academic cheating among students in Singapore.Ethics & Behavior,11(3),261-274.
  38. McCabe, D. L.,Trevino, L. K.,Butterfield, K. D.(2001).Cheating in academic institutions: A decade of research.Ethics & Behavior,11(3),219-232.
  39. Merriam-Webster(1993).Webster’s third new international dictionary.Springfield, MA:Author.
  40. Miller, A. D.,Murdock, T. B.,Anderman, E. M.,Poindexter, A. L.(2007).Who are all these cheaters? Characteristic of academically dishonest students.Psychology of academic cheating,Burlington, MA:
  41. Murdock, T. B.,Anderman, E. M.(2006).Motivational perspectives on student cheating: Toward an intetrated model of academic dishonesty.Educational Psychologist,41(3),129-145.
  42. Murdock, T. B.,Hale, N. M.,Weber, M. J.(2001).Predictors of cheating among early adolescents: Academic and social motivation.Contemporary Educational Psychology,26(1),96-115.
  43. Murdock, T. B.,Miller, A. D.,Goetzinger, A.(2007).Effects of classroom context on university students’ judgments about cheating: Mediating and moderating process.Social Psychology of Education,10(2),141-169.
  44. Niiya, Y.,Ballantyne, R.,North, M. S.,Crocker, J.(2008).Gender, contingencies of self-worth, and achievement goals as predictors of academic cheating in a controlled laboratory setting.Basic and Applied Social Psychology,30(1),76-83.
  45. Orosz, G.,Farkas, D.,Roland-Lévy, C.(2013).Are competition and extrinsic motivation reliable predictors of academic cheating?.Frontiers in Psychology,4,1-16.
  46. Pavlin-Bernardić, N.,Rovan, D.,Pavlović, J.(2017).Academic cheating in mathematics classes: A motivational perspective.Ethics & Behavior,27(6),486-501.
  47. Rubio, D. M.,Berg-Weger, M.,Tebb, S. S.(2001).Using structural equation modeling to test for multidimensionality.Structural Equation Modeling,8(4),613-626.
  48. Schab, F.(1991).Schooling without learning: Thirty years of cheating in high school.Adolescence,26(104),839-847.
  49. Sierra, J. J.,Hyman, M. R.(2006).A dual-process model of cheating intentions.Journal of Marketing Education,28(3),193-204.
  50. Tas, Y.,Tekkaya, C.(2010).Personal and contextual factors associated with students’ cheating in science.The Journal of Experimental Education,78(4),440-463.
  51. Van Yperen, N. W,Hamstra, M. R. W.,van der Klauw, M.(2011).To win, or not to lose, at any cost: The impact of achievement goals on cheating.British Journal of Management,22(1),S5-S15.
  52. Whitley, B. E., Jr.(1998).Factors associated with cheating among college students: A review.Research in Higher Education,39(3),235-274.
  53. Whitley, B. E., Jr.,Nelson, A. B.,Jones, C. J.(1999).Gender differences in cheating attitudes and classroom cheating behavior: A meta-analysis.Sex Role,41(9-10),657-680.
  54. Yang, S. C.(2012).Attitudes and behaviors related to academic dishonesty: A survey of Taiwanese graduate students.Ethics & Behavior,22(3),218-237.
  55. Yang, S. C.,Huang, C. L.,Chen, A. S.(2013).An investing of college students’ perceptions of academic dishonesty, reasons for dishonesty, achievement goals, and willingness to report dishonesty behavior.Ethics & Behavior,23(6),501-522.
  56. 何琦瑜, C.-Y.(2003)。家長與老師品格教育大調查。天下雜誌,287,42-46。
  57. 吳靜吉, J.-J.,程炳林, B.-L.(1992)。激勵的學習策略量表之修訂。測驗年刊,39,59-78。
  58. 林清山, C.-S.,程炳林, B.-L.(1997)。國科會專案研究報告國科會專案研究報告,臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:國立臺灣師範大學=National Taiwan Normal University。
  59. 姚招帆, C.-F.(2006)。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan,國立臺灣師範大學=National Taiwan Normal University。
  60. 張映芬, Y.-F.(2008)。臺南市=Tainan, Taiwan,國立成功大學=National Cheng Kung University。
  61. 黃耀興, Y.-H.(2011)。彰化縣=Changhua, Taiwan,大葉大學=Da-Yeh University。
  62. 劉家樺, C.-H.(2007)。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan,國立臺灣大學=National Taiwan University。
  63. 謝尚旻, S.-M.,葉紹國, S.-K.(2006)。大學生的學業不誠實行為及其背景時間、運用因素之關係。高等教育,1(1),149-188。
  64. 藍明智, M.-C.(1996)。國小學童對學業不誠實行為之認知差異分析。教育心理學報,28,195-218。
被引用次数
  1. 程炳林,彭淑玲(2020)。學生為何作弊?以條件化間接效果考驗課室目標結構、個人成就目標、無聊與作弊之關係。教育心理學報,51(3),387-413。
  2. 林宴瑛(2022)。國中生考試愉悅歷程模式之驗證與分析。教育心理學報,53(4),923-947。
  3. 熊師瑤,余民寧(2023)。To Stay or Not to Stay?軍校生恆毅力影響與預測效果分析。教育心理學報,54(4),917-944。
  4. (2023)。控制—價值評估互動對愉悅/無聊情緒與動機涉入之效果。教育科學研究期刊,68(4),1-33。
  5. (2024)。學業情緒代價模式考驗暨檢驗自我效能的調節效果。教育心理學報,55(3),607-628。
  6. (2024)。應用計畫行為理論探究學生作弊行為之縱貫分析。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊,17(1),69-99。