题名

人力資本、文化資本、社會資本與取得私立高薪幼稚園教職之研究

并列篇名

Human Capital, Culture Capital, Social Capital and Teaching Job Attainment in Private-High-salary Kindergarten

DOI

10.7038/JETP.200906.0166

作者

陳怡靖

关键词

私幼高薪教職取得 ; 人力資本 ; 文化資本 ; 社會資本 ; teaching job attainment in private-high-salary kindergartens ; personal background ; human capital ; culture capital ; social capital

期刊名称

教育理論與實踐學刊

卷期/出版年月

19期(2009 / 06 / 01)

页次

165 - 200

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

台灣公立幼稚園教職一位難求,大多數求職者轉而關心如何取得私立幼稚園較高薪資的教職。本研究以最近五年取得目前教職的私立幼稚園老師作分析,結果發現教育程度是影響取得高薪教職最重要的因素,但是公立學校畢業並未顯著有較高機會取得高薪教職;其次「證照數量」與「有任教經驗」也有利於取得較高薪教職;此外外表談吐條件較佳的求職者(代表某部分的文化資本),也較有利於取得私幼高薪教職;上述研究結果提供了幼教師未來求職前自我規劃與成長的方向。唯社會資本難以發揮功效,因為「有介紹人幫忙」或「發動個人社會資源」並未有利於取得私幼高薪教職。

英文摘要

In Taiwan, it is difficult to attain a teaching job in public kindergartens that most job seekers focus on one thing: how to attain a teaching job with higher salary in private kindergartens. The study analyzes the teachers that have attained a teaching job in the past five years. The results show the educational level is the primary factor influencing teaching job attainment in private-high-salary kindergartens but the employee who graduated from public school doesn't significantly have the higher opportunity to get high-salary teaching job. Meanwhile, the 'certificate quantity' and 'teaching experience' benefit to attain a high-salary teaching job. The employees that are nice looking and elegant styled speech (it means they have some part the higher cultural capital) have more opportunity to be high-salary teachers. The above results can provide a direction in searching a teaching job. The social capital is not a significant effect to attain a high-salary teaching job because the 'searching powerful man to recommend' or 'applying social resource' is no benefit to attain a job.

主题分类 社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. 林俊瑩、吳格益(2007)。家庭因素、學校因素對學生學業成就的影響-階層線性模式的分析。教育研究集刊,53(4),107-144。
    連結:
  2. 陳怡靖(2001)。台灣地區高中/技職分流與教育機會不均等性之變遷。教育研究集刊,47,253-282。
    連結:
  3. 劉韻僖、陳心田(2006)。企業員工求職方式之研究-社會資本的觀點。輔仁管理評論,13(1),1-30。
    連結:
  4. 蔡瑞明、紀金山、熊瑞梅(2002)。中等師資供需組織關係形式的建構。教育與社會研究,4,135-179。
    連結:
  5. Becker, G. S.(1964).Human capital.New York:National Bureau of Economic Research.
  6. Blau, P. M.,Duncan, O. D.(1967).The American occupation structure.New York:Wiley.
  7. Bourdieu, P.,R. B. Brown (Ed.)(1973).Knowledge, education, and culture change.London:Tavistock.
  8. Bouty, I.(2000).Personal and interaction influences on informal resource exchanges between R & D researchers across organizational boundaries.Academy of Management Journal,43(1),50-65.
  9. Colic-Peisker. V.,Walker, I.(2003).Human Capital, acculturation and sociall identity: Bosnina Refugees in Australia.Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology,13,337-360.
  10. Collins, R.(1979).The credential society.New York:Academic.
  11. Collins, R.(1971).Functional and conflict theories of educational stratification.American Sociological Review,36,1002-1019.
  12. Dc Graaf, N. D.,Flap, D. H.(1988).With a little help from my friends.Social Forces,67(2),452-472.
  13. De Graaf, P. M.(1986).The impact of financial and cultural resources on educational attainment in the Netherlands.Sociology of Education,59,237-246.
  14. DiMaggio, P.,Mohr, J.(1985).Cultural capital, educational attainment, and marital selection.American Journal of Sociology,90,1231-1261.
  15. Dumais, S. A.(2002).Cultural capital, gender, and school success: The role of habitus.Sociology of Education,75,44-68.
  16. Farkas, G.(1996).Human cap ital or cultural capital? Ethnicity and poverty groups in an urban school district.New York:Aldine de Gruyter.
  17. Gartman, D.(1991).Culture as class symbolization or mass reification? A critique of Bourdieu's distinction.American Journal of Sociology,97(2),421-447.
  18. Hitt, M. A.,Bierman, L.,Shimizu, K.,Koehhar, R.(2001).Direct and moderating effects of human capital on strategy and performance in professional service firms: A resource-based perspective.Academy of Management Journal,44,13-28.
  19. Kalmijn, M.(1994).Mother's occupational status and children's schooling.American Sociological Review,59,257-275.
  20. Kalmijn, M.,Kraaykamp, G.(1996).Race, cultural capital, and schooling: An analysis of trends in The United States.Sociology of Education,69,22-34.
  21. Katsillis, J.,Rubinsion, R.(1990).Cultural capital student achievement and educational reproduction: The case of Greece.American Sociological Review,55,270-279.
  22. Lareau, A.,Horvat, E. M.(1999).Moments of social inclusion and exclusion race, class, and cultural capital in family-school relationships.Sociology of Education,72,37-53.
  23. Lee, S.,Brinton, M. C.(1996).Elite education and social vapital: The case of South Korea.Sociology of Education,69,177-192.
  24. Leibowitz, A.(1974).Home investments in children.Journal of Political Economy,82,111-131.
  25. Lin, N.(1976).Foundations of social research.New York:Mcgraw-Hill Book Company.
  26. Lin, N.(2001).Social capital A theory of social structure and action.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  27. Lin, N.,R.L. Breiger (Eds.)(1990).Social mobility and social structure.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  28. Lucas, S. R.,Berends, M.(2002).Sociodemographic diversity, correlated achievement, and de facto tracking.Sociology of Education,75,328-348.
  29. Mare, R. D.(1981).Change and stability in educational stratification.American Sociological Review,46,72-87.
  30. Marsden, P. V.,Hulbert, J. S.(1988).Social resources and mobility outcomes: a replication and extension.Social Forces,66(4),1038-1059.
  31. Mincer, J.(1974).Schooling, experience and earnings.New York:National Bureau of Economic Research.
  32. Murnane, R. J.,Maynard, R. A.,Obls, J. C.(1981).Home resources and children's achievement.Review of Economics and Statistics,63,369-377.
  33. Mussoline, L. J.,Shouse, R. C.(2001).School restructuring as a policy agenda: Why one size may not fit all.Sociology of Education,74,44-58.
  34. Roscigno, V. C.,Ainsworth-Darnell, J. W.(1999).Race, cultural capital, and educational resources: Persistent inequalities and achievement returns.Sociology of Education,72,158-178.
  35. Sakamoto, A.,Powers, D. A.(1996).Education and the dual labor market for Japanese men.American Economic Review,60,222-246.
  36. Scoff, J.(2004).Family, gender, and educational attainment in Britain: A longitudinal study.Journal of Comparative Family Studies,35(4),565-589.
  37. Sewell, W. H.,Hauser, R. M.(1975).Education, occupation, and earnings: Achievement in the early career.New York:Academic.
  38. Swidler, A.(1986).Culture in action: Symbols and strategies.American Sociological Review,51,273-286.
  39. Wegener, B.(1991).Job mobility arid social ties: social resources, prior job and status attainment.American Sociological Review,56,60-71.
  40. 江豐富(1995)。以文憑還是以人力資本取才-台灣地區實證研究。教育研究資訊,3(5),17-35。
  41. 羊憶蓉、王振寰主編、瞿海源主編(1999)。社會學與台灣社會。台北:巨流。
  42. 林清山(1991)。多變量分析統計法。台北:東華。
  43. 紀金山(2005)。教師背景與初職位置:中學教師背景特質對取得各類型教職位置的影響。台灣教育社會學研究,5(2),49-83。
  44. 紀金山(2002)。師資培育制度變革的社會學分析:朝向組織統理的制度轉型。嘉義:南華大學教社所。
  45. 孫清山、黃毅志(1994)。社會資源、文化資本與職業取得。東海學報,35,127-150。
  46. 孫清山、黃毅志(1996)。補習教育、文化資本與教育取得。台灣社會學刊,19,95-139。
  47. 張笠雲(2003)。2003台灣與國際教育長期追蹤資料庫東部工作坊。台東市:國科會人文處。
  48. 九十五學年度(2006~2007)幼稚園概況-學校所在地區別
  49. 許嘉猷(1992)。社會階層化與社會流動。台北:三民。
  50. 陳怡靖(2007)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告,未出版
  51. 陳怡靖、中華醫事學院幼兒保育系主編(2006)。幼兒保育專業發展-理論與實務。台北:華騰。
  52. 陳怡靖、鄭燿男(2000)。台灣地區教育階層化之變遷-檢證社會資本論、文化資本論及財務資本論在台灣的適用性。國家科學委員會研究彙刊:人文及社會科學,10(3),416-434。
  53. 曾敏傑(2002)。人力資本、勞力區隔、與性別薪資歧視:藍領與白領工作者的比較。台灣教育社會學研究,2(1),113-153。
  54. 黃毅志(2002)。林南(Nan Lin)的「社會資本(Social Capital)」理論對於台灣教育社會學研究之啟發。台灣教育社會學研究,2(2),153-163。
  55. 黃毅志(1996)。台灣地區民眾地位取得之因果機制-共變結構分析。東吳社會學報,5,213-248。
  56. 黃毅志(1998)。台灣地區新職業分類的建構與評估。調查研究,5,5-36。
  57. 黃毅志、陳怡靖(2005)。台灣的升學問題:教育社會學理論與研究之檢討。台灣教育社會學研究,5(1),77-118。
  58. 楊淑朱、王佳芬(2003)。私立幼稚園教師分級制實施之可行模式研究。嘉義大學國民教育研究學報,11,41-67。
  59. 廖茂榮(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。私立東吳大學經濟學系。
  60. 劉正、李錦華(2001)。文憑主義的迷思:從勞工的薪資與雇主的徵才談起。台灣教育社會學研究,1(2),91-129。
  61. 劉姿君(1992)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立政治大學教育學系。
  62. 蔡瑞明、林大森、劉兆佳主編、尹寶珊主編、李明坤主編、黃紹倫主編(2000)。市場、階級與政治:變遷中的華人社會。香港:香港中文大學亞太研究所。
  63. 魏美惠(2002)。剖析台灣幼兒教育的生態環境。幼兒教育年刊,14,113-124。
  64. 邊燕傑、涂肇慶主編、林益民主編(1999)。改革開放與中國社會-西方社會學文獻述評。香港:牛津大學。
被引用次数
  1. (2016)。反省文化資本理論在臺灣的有效性:文化品味、教育和階級的關聯性及其變遷。臺灣教育社會學研究,16(1),39-87。