Holland職業類型對參與補救教學之高職生數學態度與學習滿意度影響之研究

Effect of Holland Professional Types on Attitude toward Mathematics Learning and Learning Satisfaction of Vocational High School Students Receiving Remedial Teaching

10.6278/tjme.202004_7(1).002

廖元良(Yuan-Liang Liao)；鄭正豐(Cheng-Feng Cheng)；謝廷豪(Ting-Hao Hsieh)；陳姿樺(Tzu-Hua Chen)

何倫職業類型 ； 補救教學 ； 數學態度 ； 學習滿意度 ； 職業興趣 ； Holland professional types ； remedial teaching ； mathematics attitude ； learning satisfaction ； vocational interests

臺灣數學教育期刊

7卷1期（2020 / 04 / 01）

55 - 78

繁體中文

本研究之目的在探討參與補救教學高職學生之數學態度與學習滿意度，並進一步藉由Holland職業類型之觀點，探討其對數學態度與學習滿意度的影響。研究樣本以臺中市高職學校並有接受補救教學之學生為對象，從83個班級當中採立意取樣隨機方式發放數學態度、學習滿意度等問卷共計631份，回收有效問卷507份，有效回收率82.57%，進一步透過信效度分析、Pearson積差相關分析、獨立樣本t檢定、單因子變異數分析與逐步迴歸分析等驗證本研究假設。研究發現：參與補救教學高職學生的數學態度與學習滿意度有顯著相關，何倫職業類型對數學態度與學習滿意度有顯著解釋力，不同性別高職學生在數學態度與學習滿意度有顯著差異，不同就讀類群高職學生在數學態度與學習滿意度有顯著差異。

This study aimed at exploring the effect of remedial teaching on attitude toward mathematics learning and learning satisfaction of vocational high school students from the perspective of Holland professional types. The participants were students who received remedial teaching in a vocational high school in Taichung City. Purposive random sampling was adopted to select students from 83 classes. A total of 631 questionnaires regarding mathematics learning attitude and learning satisfaction were distributed to the students and 507 valid responses were collected, yielding an effective response rate of 82.57%. Subsequently, this study conducted validity and reliability analysis, Pearson product-moment correlation analysis, independent samples t test, one-way analysis of variance, and stepwise regression analysis to validate the hypotheses proposed in this study. The results revealed that mathematics learning attitude and learning satisfaction of vocational high school students had a significant correlation. The Holland professional types exhibited significant explanatory power over mathematics learning attitude and learning satisfaction.

1. 余民寧, Min-Nin,李昭鋆, Chao-Yun(2018)。補救教學中個別化教學對學生學習成效之影響分析。教育科學研究期刊，63(1)，247-271。
   連結：
2. 吳怡儒, Yi-Ru,蔡文榮, Wen-Rong,李林滄, Lin-Tsang(2012)。彰化縣偏遠地區國中學生數學學習態度及其影響因素之研究。教育科學期刊，11(1)，25-57。
   連結：
3. 李再長, Tzai-Zang,黃麗鴦, Li-Yang(2007)。在職人士進修之學習動機、學習滿意度及學習績效之相關研究－以成大碩士在職專班為例。人力資源管理學報，7(4)，1-24。
   連結：
4. 區雅倫, Ya-Lun,翁儷禎, Li-Jen,李庚霖, Keng-Lin(2012)。台灣高中生的生涯興趣結構分析－以大考中心興趣量表為例。教育心理學報，44(1)，117-138。
   連結：
5. 張春興, Chun-Hsing(2000).教育心理學.臺北=Taipei:東華=Tunghua.
   連結：
6. 陳淑麗,Shu-Li,曾世杰, Shih-Jay,張毓仁, Yu-Jen(2015)。國小二年級不同補救教學方案之實施與成效之比較：攜手計畫與永齡希望小學。當代教育研究季刊，23(2)，35-74。
   連結：
7. 黃若飴, Ruoh-Yi(2007)。探討性別和不同性質體育課程下教導方式、學習動機及學習策略與大學生桌球課學習滿意度之間的關係。台灣運動心理學報，10，15-36。
   連結：
8. 劉鎮寧, Jen-Ning(2016)。中小學補救教學政策執行問題之分析－以高雄市為例。學校行政，101，166-184。
   連結：
9. Abraugh, J. B.(2000).How classroom environment and student engagement affecting in internet-based MBA courses.Business Communication Quarterly,63(4),9-26.
10. Aiken, L. R., Jr(1970).Attitude toward mathematics.Review of Educational Research,40(4),551-596.
11. Bassey, S. W.,Joshua, M. T.,Asim, A. E.(2011).Gender differences and mathematics achievement of rural senior secondary students in Cross River state, Nigeria.Mathematics Connection,10,56-60.
12. Beder, H.(1991).The stigma of illiteracy.Adult Basic Education,1(2),67-77.
13. Berger, I. E.(1999).The influence of advertising frequency on attitude-behavior consistency: A memory based analysis.Journal of Social Behavior and Personality,14(4),547-568.
14. Biner, P. M.,Dean, R. S.,Millinger, A. E.(1994).Factors underlying distance learner satisfaction with televised college-level courses.American Journal of Distance Education,8(1),60-71.
15. Butt, I. H.,Dogar, A. H.(2014).Gender disparity in mathematics achievement among the rural and urban high school students in Pakistan.Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences,34(1),93-100.
16. Chen, P. D.,Simpson, P. A.(2015).Does personality matter? Applying Holland's typology to analyze students' self-selection into science, technology, engineering, and mathematics majors.The Journal of Higher Education,86(5),725-750.
17. Fennema, E.,Sherman, J. A.(1976).Fennema-Sherman mathematics attitudes scales: Instruments designed to measure attitudes toward the learning of mathematics by females and males.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,7(5),324-326.
18. Ganley, C. M.,Lubienski, S. T.(2016).Mathematics confidence, interest, and performance: Examining gender patterns and reciprocal relations.Learning and Individual Differences,47,182-193.
19. Hair, J. F.,Anderson, R. E.,Tatham, R. L.,Black,W. C.(1998).Multivariate data analysis.Upper Saddle River, NJ:Practice Hall.
20. Holland, J. L.(1959).A theory of vocational choice.Journal of Counseling Psychology,6(1),35-45.
21. Holland, J. L.(1958).A personality inventory employing occupational titles.Journal of Applied Psychology,42(5),336-342.
22. Holland, J. L.(1958).Making vocational choice: A theory of vocational personality and work environments.Eaglewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
23. Holland, J. L.(1966).The psychology of vocational choice: A theory of personality types and model environments.Waltham, MA:Blasisdell.
24. Holland,J. L.(1973).Making vocational choices: A theory of careers.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
25. Knowles, M. S.(1970).The modern practice of adult education: Andragogy versus pedagogy.New York, NY:Association Press.
26. Lam, Y. L. J.,Wong, A.(1974).Attendance regularity of adult learners: An examination of content and structural factors.Adult Education Quarterly,24(2),130-142.
27. Lee, C. Y.,Chen, M. P.(2010).Taiwanese junior high school students’ mathematics attitudes and perceptions toward virtual manipulatives.British Journal of Educational Technology,41(2),17-21.
28. Martin, C. L.(1988).Enhancing children’s satisfaction and participation using a predictive regression model of bowling performance norms.The Physical Educator,45(4),196-209.
29. Nunnally, J.,Bernstein, I.(1994).Psychometric theory.New York, NY:McGraw Hill.
30. Patrick, L.,Care, E.,Ainley, M.(2011).The relationship between vocational interests, self-efficacy, and achievement in the prediction of educational pathways.Journal of Career Assessment,19(1),61-74.
31. Podsakoff, P. M.,MacKenzie, S. B.,Lee, J.-Y.,Podsakoff, N. P.(2003).Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.Journal of Applied Psychology,88(5),879-903.
32. Raval, H.,McKenney, S.,Pieters, J. M.(2014).Remedial teaching in Indian under-resourced communities: Professional development of para-teachers.International Journal of Educational Development,38,87-93.
33. Robertson, K. F.,Smeets, S.,Lubinski, D.,Benbow, C. P.(2010).Beyond the threshold hypothesis: Even among the gifted and top math/science graduate students, cognitive abilities, vocational interests, and lifestyle preferences matter for career choice, performance, and persistence.Current Directions in Psychological Science,19(6),346-351.
34. Rosenberg, M. J.(Ed.),Hovland, C. I.(Ed.),McGuire, W. J.(Ed.),Abelson, R. P.(Ed.),Brehm, J. W.(Ed.)(1960).Attitude organization and change: An analysis of consistency among attitude components.New Haven, CT:Yale University Press.
35. Shavit, Y.(Ed.),Muller, W.(Ed.)(1998).From school to work: A comparative study of educational qualifications and occupational destinations.New York, NY:Oxford University Press.
36. Sierpinska, A.(Ed.),Kilpatrick, J.(Ed.)(1998).Mathematics education as a research domain: A search for identify.Dordrecht, The Netherlands:Kluwer Academic Publishers.
37. Small, R. V.,Venkatesh, M.(2000).A cognitive-motivation model of decision satisfaction.Instructional Science,28(1),1-22.
38. Tough, A.(1971).The adult’slearning projects: A fresh approach to theory and practice in adult learning.Toronto, Canada:The Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
39. 吳梅蘭, Mei-Lan,曾哲仁, Jhe-Ren(1994)。國小學童數學態度極其相關因素之研究。臺南師院學生學刊，15，19-38。
40. 金樹人, Shuh-Ren(1991)。職業興趣與人格之關聯性研究。教育心理學報，24，97-115。
41. 徐慧中, Hui-Chung,徐偉民, Wei-Min(2019)。以差異化教學實施國小混齡數學補救教學之行動研究。台灣數學教師，40(2)，1-28。
42. 張春興, Chun-Hsing(1989).張氏心理學辭典.臺北=Taipei:東華=Tunghua.
43. 張新仁, Shin-Jen(2001)。實施補救教學之課程與教學設計。教育學刊，17，85-106。
44. 楊巧玲, Chiao-Ling(2005)。性別化的興趣與能力：高中學生類組選擇之探究。臺灣教育社會學研究，5(2)，113-153。
45. 魏麗敏, Li-Min(1989)。國小學生數學焦慮，數學態度與數學成就之關係。中國測驗學會測驗年刊，36，47-60。
46. 譚寧君, Ning-Jyun(1992)。兒童數學態度與解題能力之分析探討。國立臺北師範學院學報，5，621-677。