题名

參與教師社群教師知識信念、目標設定及教學意志力之研究:以新北市國小為例

并列篇名

A Study of Teachers' Epistemological Beliefs, Goal Setting, and Teaching Volition in the Teachers' Professional Learning Communities: The Cases of Primary School in New Taipei City

DOI

10.3966/102887082014036001002

作者

黃儒傑(Ju-Chieh Huang)

关键词

目標設定 ; 知識信念 ; 教師專業社群 ; 教學意志力 ; teachers' professional learning communities (PLC) ; epistemological beliefs ; goal setting ; teaching volition

期刊名称

教育研究集刊

卷期/出版年月

60:1期(2014 / 03 / 31)

页次

39 - 76

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本研究實施問卷調查,以瞭解參與教師社群和未參與教師社群教師在知識信念、目標設定與教學意志力的差異情形,並分析參與教師社群教師的知識信念與目標設定對其教學意志力的關係。本研究針對新北市國小進行問卷調查,共回收參與教師社群教師問卷266份及未參與教師社群教師問卷273份,回收率為60.7%與62.3%。問卷資料經採多變量變異數分析、結構方程模式分析後,發現一些重要結論。首先,參與教師社群教師具有較佳的知識信念觀點、目標設定與教學意志力。其次,本研究所提出之「參與教師社群教師之知識信念與目標設定對教學意志力關係」的假設模式,具理想適配度。最後,優質的知識信念與目標設定,有助於增進社群教師的教學意志力,且優質的知識信念還能促進優質的目標設定,進而更提高教學意志力。依據前述研究結論,本研究並提出一些相關建議。

英文摘要

This study used questionnaires to analyze the differences between Professional Learning Communities (PLC) teachers and non-PLC teachers in terms of epistemological beliefs, goal setting, and teaching volition, and to analyze LC teachers' relationships with the epistemological beliefs, goal setting, and teaching volition of teachers. Questionnaires were administered to PLC teachers as well as non-PLC teachers in New Taipei City. PLC teachers returned 266 questionnaires and non- PLC teachers returned 273 questionnaires. Factor analysis, MANOVA, and structural equation models were used to analyze the questionnaire data and several valuable results were found. First, the LC teachers showed better epistemological beliefs, higher goal setting, and higher level of teaching volition than non-PLC teachers. Second, the result of the goodness-of-fit was satisfactory when it was used to test the hypothetical structural relationships between epistemological beliefs, goal setting, and teaching volition. Finally, epistemological beliefs and goal setting were found to have a considerable impact on the teaching volition or PLC teachers. Based on these findings, several suggestions for the PLC teachers and for future research are offered.

主题分类 社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. 丁一顧(2011)。教師專業學習社群與教師集體效能感關係模式驗證之研究。屏東教育大學學報:教育類,37,1-26。
    連結:
  2. 何縕琪、張景媛(2003)。合作省思專業成長模式對國小教師的教學知識與信念以及社群關係之影響。教育心理學報,34(2),157-178。
    連結:
  3. 張淑宜、辛俊德(2011)。學習社群與教師專業表現關係之研究。臺中教育大學學報:教育類,25(1),83-103。
    連結:
  4. 陳孟修、周德光、李綉芬、林麗芬(2011)。保險業從業人員之目標設定與領導風格對工作績效的影響之研究。興國學報,12,1-14。
    連結:
  5. 陳萩卿、張景媛(2007)。知識信念影響學習運作模式之驗證。教育心理學報,39(1),23-43。
    連結:
  6. 程炳林(2001)。動機、目標設定、行動控制、學習策略之關係:自我調整學習歷程模式之建構及驗證。師大學報:教育類,46(1),67-92。
    連結:
  7. 劉佩雲(2011)。知識/認識觀、目標導向與認知投入徑路模式之檢驗。課程與教學季刊,14(2),135-160。
    連結:
  8. 劉政宏(2009)。對學習行為最有影響力的動機成分?雙核心動機模式之初探。教育心理學報,41(2),361-384。
    連結:
  9. 劉政宏、黃博聖、蘇嘉鈴、陳學志、吳有城(2010)。國中小學習動機量表之編製及其信效度研究。測驗學刊,57(3),371-402。
    連結:
  10. 新北市政府教育局(2012)。新北市101學年度公立高中職及國中小教師社群申辦暨審查計畫。取自http: //tesag.ntpc.edu.tw/news/u_news_v2.asp?id={B211D844-E596-4874-A187-61B6733F4D25}&newsid=81 [Education Department of New Taipei City Government. (2012). 2012 teacher communities' applications and examination plan of elementary and high school in New Taipei city. Retrieved from http://tesag.ntpc.edu.tw/news/u_news_v2.asp?id={B211D844-E596-4874-A187-61B6733F4D25}&newsid=81]
  11. Aron, A.、Aron, E. N.、黃瓊蓉譯(2005)。心理與教育統計學。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:學富=Xue Fu。
  12. Byman, R.,Kansanen, P.(2008).Pedagogical thinking in a student's mind: A conceptual clarification on the basis of self-determination and volition theories.Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research,52(6),603-621.
  13. Conley, A. M.,Pintrich, P. R.,Vekiri, I.,Harrison, D.(2004).Changes in epistemological beliefs in elementary science students.Contemporary Educational Psychology,29,186-204.
  14. Corno, L.(1993).The best-laid plans: Modern conceptions of volition and educational research.Educational Researcher,22,14-22.
  15. Cwikla, J.(2003).The importance of setting learning goals to investigate the effectiveness of teacher professional development.Educational Research Quarterly,27(2),43-59.
  16. Fang, Z.(1996).A review of research on teacher beliefs and practices.Educational Research,38(1),47-65.
  17. Gemmell, J. C.(2003).Amhers, MA,University of Massachusetts Amherst.
  18. Goddard, R. D.,Hoy, W. K.,Hoy, W. K.(2004).Collective efficacy beliefs: Theoretical developments, empirical evidence, and future directions.Educational Research Journal,33(3),3-13.
  19. Heckhausen, J.(Ed.),Dweck, C. S.(Ed.)(1998).Motivation and selfregulation across the life-span.New York, NY:Cambridge University Press.
  20. Hofer, B. K.(2001).Personal epistemology research: Implications for learning and teaching.Journal of Educational Psychology Review,13(4),353-383.
  21. Hofer, B. K.,Pintrich, P. R.(1997).The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning.Review of Educational Research,67(1),88-140.
  22. Hughes, A. T.(1995).Teacher evaluation: An analysis of implementation of a goal-setting professional growth model.Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education,9,243-257.
  23. Kenny, D. A.(2014).,未出版
  24. Locke, E. A.(1968).Toward a theory of task motivation and incentives.Organizational Behavior and Human Performance,3(2),157-189.
  25. Locke, E. A.,Bryan, J. F.(1968).Goal-setting as a determinant of the effect of knowledge of score on performance.American Journal of Psychology,81,398-406.
  26. Locke, E. A.,Latham, G. P.(1990).Work motivation and satisfaction: Light at the end of the tunnel.Psychological Science,1(4),240-246.
  27. Locke, E. A.,Latham, G. P.(1985).The application of goal setting to sports.Journal of Sport Psychology,7,205-222.
  28. Locke, E. A.,Latham, G. P.,Erez, M.(1988).The determinants of goal commitment.Academy of Management Review,13,23-39.
  29. Louis, K. S.,Marks, H. M.(1998).Does professional community affect the classroom? Teachers' work and student experiences in restructuring schools.American Journal of Education,106(4),532-575.
  30. Martin-Kniep, G. O.(2004).Developing learning communities through teacher expertise.Thousand Oaks, CA:Corwin Press.
  31. Merseth, K. K.(1991).Supporting beginning teachers with computer networks.Journal of Teacher Education,42(2),140-147.
  32. Miller, R. B.,Behrens, J. T.,Greene, B. A.,Newman, D.(1993).Goals and perceived ability: Impact on student valuing, self-regulation, and persistence.Contemporary Educational Psychology,18,2-14.
  33. Miller, R. B.,Brickman, S. J.(2004).A model of future-oriented motivation and selfregulation.Educational Psychology Review,16(1),9-33.
  34. Orbell, S.(2003).Personality systems interactions theory and the theory of planner behaviour: Evidence that self-regulatory volitional components enhance enactment of studying behaviour.British Journal of Social Psychology,42,95-112.
  35. Rader, L. A.(2005).Goal setting for students and teachers: Six steps to success.Clearing House,78(3),123-126.
  36. Ravindran, B.,Greene, B. A.,DeBacker, T. K.(2005).Predicting pre-service teachers' cognitive engagement with goals and epistemological beliefs.The Journal of Educational Research,98(4),222-232.
  37. Renn, R. W.,Danehower, C.,Swiercz, P. M.,Icenogle, M. L.(1999).Further examination of the measurement properties of Leifer & McGannon's (1986) goal acceptance and goal commitment scales.Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology,72(1),107-115.
  38. Schoenfeld, A. H.(1988).When good teaching leads to bas results: The disasters of "wellthought" mathematics courses.Educational Psychology,23,145-166.
  39. Schommer, M.(1990).Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension.Journal of Educational Psychology,82,498-504.
  40. Schommer, M.,Calvert, C.,Gariglietti, G.,Bajaj, A.(1997).The development of epistemological among secondary students: A longitudinal study.Journal of Educational Psychology,89(1),37-40.
  41. Schommer-Aikins, M.(2004).Explaining the epistemological belief system: Introducing the embedded systemic model and coordinated research approach.Educational Psychologist,39(1),19-29.
  42. Spence, J. T.(Ed.)(1983).Achievement and achievement motivation.San Francisco, CA:W. H. Freeman.
  43. Tschannen-Moran, M.,Hoy, A. W.,Hoy, W. K.(1998).Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure.Review of Educational Research,68(2),202-248.
  44. Wang, L.,Ertmer, P. A.(2003).Impact of vicarious learning experiences and goal setting on preservice teachers' self-efficacy for technology integration: A pilot study.Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association,Chicago, IL:
  45. Wheatley, K. F.(2002).,未出版
  46. Wiener, Y.(1982).Commitment in organizations: A normative view.The Academy of Management Review,7(3),418-428.
  47. Zimmerman, B. J.(Ed.),Schunk, D. H.(Ed.)(2008).Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications.New York, NY:Lawrence Erlbaum.
  48. 丁一顧、張德銳(2010)。臺北市教學導師教師領導與專業學習社群關係之研究。教育行政與評鑑學刊,10,55-84。
  49. 王秀津(2009)。教師實踐社群故事:承諾與競合。學生輔導,98,96-101。
  50. 王曉晴(2008)。臺中縣=Taichung, Taiwan,東海大學=Tunghai University。
  51. 吳明隆(2009)。結構方程模式:AMOS的操作與應用。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:五南圖書=Wu-Nan Book。
  52. 吳明隆(2006)。SPSS統計應用學習實務:問卷分析與應用統計。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:知城數位=Zhi Cheng。
  53. 辛俊德、許天維(2009)。國民小學社群特徵對教育信念與專業表現關係之研究。教育行政論壇,1(1),53-87。
  54. 林紀慧(2001)。國小學童知識信念的發展以及與學業成績之相關研究。臺中師院學報,15,191-206。
  55. 施淑慎(2002)。兒童的自我效能信念、目標設定行為、以及自律學習之探討。國立臺北師範學院學報,15,263-282。
  56. 洪碧霜(2005)。彰化縣=Chunghua, Taiwan,國立彰化師範大學=National Chunghua University of Education。
  57. 高博銓(2011)。教師社群發展的問題與因應。教育研究月刊,201,39-48。
  58. 郭錦鳳(2008)。臺南市=Tainan, Taiwan,國立臺南大學=National University of Tainan。
  59. 陳正昌、程炳林(1998)。SPSS、SAS、BMDP統計軟體在多變量統計上的應用。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:五南圖書=Wu-Nan Book。
  60. 黃儒傑(2009)。初任教師教學承諾及其相關因素:心理取向之探討。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:高等教育=Higher Education。
  61. 楊明山(2007)。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan,國立臺灣大學=National Taiwan University。
  62. 劉佩雲(2005)。大學生知識信念與數位學習環境中知識管理能力之研究。管理與教育研究學報,4,57-83。
  63. 蔡進雄(2003)。學校領導的新思維:建立教師學習社群。技術及職業教育雙月刊,78,42-46。
  64. 蘇益生(2004)。高雄市=Kaohsiung, Taiwan,國立高雄師範大學=National Kaohsiung Normal University。
被引用次数
  1. 陳柏霖,洪兆祥,余民寧(2019)。僑生與本地生的目標設定、全心學習、意志力及巔峰幸福之模型建構和其差異比較。教育科學研究期刊,64(2),131-160。
  2. 陳慧綺,翁暄睿(2020)。國民小學教師專業學習社群對教師教學創新影響之研究:以正向心理資本為中介變項。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊,13(3),113-138。
  3. 連倖誼、張雅筑(2017)。教師專業學習社群信念與教學效能之研究。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊,10(1),75-103。
  4. 蕭佳純(2020)。創意教學信念與創意教學行為關聯之研究:以參與專業學習社群的動機與情形為中介變項。當代教育研究季刊,28(1),1-37。
  5. 蕭佳純(2022)。學校支持對教師創造力教學行為影響之研究:角色認定與專業學習社群的多層次中介分析。教育理論與實踐學刊,46,1-29。
  6. 張媛甯、張書鳳(2016)。臺南市國民中學教師參與教師專業學習社群與 教師專業發展評鑑態度關係之研究。學校行政,102,175-200。
  7. 趙莉芬,黃湘萍(2018)。應用資訊科技於護理教學的契機與建置規劃。源遠護理,12(3),14-19。
  8. (2019)。技術型高級中等學校教師專業學習社群運作歷程與實施成效個案研究。教育政策論壇,22(4),81-128。
  9. (2023)。學校支持對教師專業成長影響之研究:專業學習社群參與的調節式中介效果。市北教育學刊,71,1-36。