题名

兵隨將轉-追隨者定位觀點下探討追隨行為

并列篇名

A Study of Follower Behaviors under the Perspective of Follower-positioning to Leader

DOI

10.3966/199687602018021101002

作者

卓明德(Ming-Te Cho);嚴奇峰(Ghi-Feng Yen);洪贊凱(Tsang-Kai Hung);李粵強(Yueh-Chiang Lee)

关键词

消極追隨行為 ; 追隨者定位 ; 疏離追隨行為 ; 模範追隨行為 ; 學習追隨行為 ; passiveness ; follower-positioning ; alienation ; exemplariness ; apprentice

期刊名称

組織與管理

卷期/出版年月

11卷1期(2018 / 02 / 01)

页次

33 - 62

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本研究提出追隨者定位之概念,即追隨者衡量自己與領導者之間的對應關係並加以定位,然後,探討不同定位類型下的部屬追隨行為。具體而言,部屬會同時考量「對主管的信任關係」以及「主管的整體專業能力」後,來決定追隨行為(模範、學習、消極及疏離)。本研究有效回收398份準實驗設計問卷,以變異數分析驗證假設。研究結果顯示,一、部屬定位主管為高信任時,會展現高度的「模範行為」;二、部屬定位主管為高能力及高信任時,會有最高程度的「學習行為」;三、部屬定位主管為低信任時,會有較高程度的「消極行為」;四、部屬定位主管為低能力及低信任時,會有最高程度的「疏離行為」。本研究最後提出管理意涵、研究限制與未來研究方向。

英文摘要

The present study proposed that follower behaviors were determined through follower-positioning process. That is, a follower will behave differently based on the positioning pattern of relationship with his/her leader. The concept of follower-positioning referred to four followership styles are derived from follower's evaluation of two critical dimensions- overall professional competence posed by leader and trust in leader. Specifically, the follower-positioning process leads to corresponding follower behaviors (e.g., exemplariness, apprentice, passiveness, and alienation). The results of quasi-experimental design (N = 398), show that: 1) follower behaved in exemplary way because of the high level trust in leader; 2) apprentice behavior was determined because of high level of leader's professional competence and personal trust in leader; 3) low level of trust in leader caused high level of passive behavior; 4) alienated behavior is determined by both low levels of leader's professional competence and trust in leader. The managerial implications, limitations and directions for further research were suggested accordingly.

主题分类 社會科學 > 管理學
参考文献
  1. 王榮春、陳彰儀(2003)。部屬觀點之領導互動論:部屬對主管領導行為的知覺因素與互動內涵初探。應用心理研究,20,181-215。
    連結:
  2. 吳宗祐(2008)。主管威權領導與部屬的工作滿意度與組織承諾:信任的中介歷程與情緒智利的調節效果。本土心理學研究,30,3-63。
    連結:
  3. 姜定宇(2009)。華人企業主管知覺部屬效忠。中華心理學刊,51(1),101-120。
    連結:
  4. 姜定宇、鄭伯壎、鄭紀瑩、周麗芳(2007)。華人效忠主管的概念分析與量表建構。中華心理學刊,49(4),407-432。
    連結:
  5. 徐瑋伶、鄭伯壎、黃敏萍(2002)。華人企業領導人的員工歸類與管理行為。本土心理學研究,18,51-94。
    連結:
  6. 陳嵩、陳光偉、李佩芬(2011)。垂直人際信任對部屬工作績效之影響:上司家長式領導的角色。管理學報,1,1-29。
    連結:
  7. 楊書毓、連廷嘉(2009)。受督導者依附行為量表之編製研究。新竹教育大學學報,26(2),23-56。
    連結:
  8. 廖國峰、吳華春(2003)。從正義知覺與關係品質的觀點探討領導者權力對員工工作投入影響之實證研究。人力資源管理學報,3(2),1-25。
    連結:
  9. Baker, S. D.(2007).Followership: The theoretical foundation of a contemporary construct.Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies,14(1),50-60.
  10. Bartholomew, K.,Horowitz, L. M.(1991).Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category model.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,61(2),226-244.
  11. Benson, A. J.,Hardy, J.,Eys, M.(2016).Contextualizing leaders' interpretations of proactive followership.Journal of Organizational Behavior,37(7),949-966.
  12. Berger, J.,Ridgeway, C. L.,Zelditch, M.(2002).Construction of status and referential structures.Sociological Theory,20,157-179.
  13. Blanchard, A. L.,Welbourne, J.,Gilmore, D.,Bullock, A.(2009).Followership styles and employee attachment to the organization.The Psychologist-Manager Journal,12(2),111-131.
  14. Branch, S.,Ramsay, S.,Barker, M.(2007).Contributing factors to workplace bullying by staff: An interview study.Journal of Management and Organization,13(3),264-281.
  15. Burke, S. C.,Sims, D. E.,Lazzara, E. H.,Salas, E.(2007).Trust in leadership: A multi-level review and integration.The Leadership Quarterly,18(6),606-632.
  16. Carsten, M. K.,Uhl-Bien, M.,West, B. J.,Patera, J. L.,McGregor, R.(2010).Exploring social constructions of followership: A qualitative study.The Leadership Quarterly,21(3),543-562.
  17. de Zilwa, D.(2016).The strengths and capacities of authentic followership.Leadership & Organization Development,37(3),310-324.
  18. DeRue, S. D.,Ashford, S. J.(2010).Who will lead and who will follow? A social process of leadership identity construction in organizations.Academy of Management Review,35(4),627-647.
  19. Dirks, K. T.,Ferrin, D. L.(2002).Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice.Journal of Applied Psychology,87,611-628.
  20. Donia, M. B. L.,Panaccio, A.,Wang, Z.(2016).Servant leadership and employee outcomes: The moderating role of subordinates' motives.European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology,25(6),978-978.
  21. Fornell, C.,Larcker, D. F.(1981).Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error.Journal of Marketing Research,18(1),39-50.
  22. Graen, G. B.,Uhl-Bien, M.(1995).Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective.The Leadership Quarterly,6(2),219-247.
  23. Hair, J. F.,Black, B.,Babin, B.,Anderson, R. E.,Tatham, R. L.(2006).Multivariate data analysis.Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice Hall.
  24. Howell, J. M.,Shamir, B.(2005).The role of followers in the charismatic leadership process: Relationships and their consequences.Academy of Management Review,30(1),96-112.
  25. Jin, M.,McDonald, B.,Park, J.(2016).Followership and job satisfaction in the public sector The moderating role of perceived supervisor support and performance-oriented culture.International Journal of Public Sector Management,29(3),218-237.
  26. Jung, D. I.,Avolio, B.(2000).Opening the black box: An experimental investigation of the mediating effects of trust and value congruence on transformational and transactional leadership.Journal of Organizational Behavior,21,949-964.
  27. Jung, D. I.,Yammarino, F. J.,Lee, J. K.(2009).Moderating role of subordinates' attitudes on transformational leadership and effectiveness: A multi-cultural and multi-level perspective.The Leadership Quarterly,20(4),586-603.
  28. Junker, N. M.,van Dick, R.(2014).Implicit theories in organizational settings: A systematic review and research agenda of implicit leadership and followership theories.The Leadership Quarterly,25(6),1154-1173.
  29. Kahn, W. A.(1990).Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work.Academy of Management Journal,33,692-724.
  30. Katz, R. L.(1955).Skill of an effective administrator.Harvard Business Review,33,33-42.
  31. Kelley, R. E.(1988).In praise of followers.Harvard Business Review,66,142-148.
  32. Kim, C.,Schachter, H. L.(2015).Exploring followership in a public setting: Is it a missing link between participative leadership and organizational performance?.American Review of Public Administration,45(4),436-457.
  33. Latour, S. M.,Rast, V. J.(2004).Dynamic followership.Air and Space Power Journal,18(4),1-7.
  34. Leroy, H.,Anseel, F.,Gardner, W. L.,Sels, L.(2015).Authentic leadership, authentic followership, basic need satisfaction, and work role performance: A cross-level study.Journal of Management,41(6),1677-1697.
  35. Meindl, J. R.(1995).The romance of leadership as a follower-centric theory: A social constructionist approach.The Leadership Quarterly,6(3),329-341.
  36. Mohamadzadeh, Z.,Mortazavi, S.,Lagzian, M.,Rahimnia, F.(2015).Toward an exploration of follower's implicit followership theories of Mashhad's large organizations using a qualitative approach.Iranian Journal of Management Studies,8(3),397-419.
  37. Mushonga, S. M.,Torrance, C. G.(2008).Assessing the relationship between followership and the big five factor model of personality.Review of Business Research,8(6),185-193.
  38. Nichols, A. L.,Cottrell, C. A.(2014).What do people desire in their leaders? The role of leadership level on trait desirability.The Leadership Quarterly,25(4),711-729.
  39. Nunnally, J. C.(1978).Psychometric theory.New York, NY:Mcgraw-Hill.
  40. Oca, B.,Bashshurb, M. R.(2013).Followership, leadership and social influence.The Leadership Quarterly,24(6),919-934.
  41. Podsakoff, P. M.,MacKenzie, S. B.,Lee, J. Y.,Podsakoff, N. P.(2003).Common method biases in behavior research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.Journal of Applied Psychology,88(5),879-903.
  42. Rothbard, N. P.(2001).Enriching or depleting? The dynamics of engagement in work and family roles.Administrative Science Quarterly,46,655-684.
  43. Shamir, B.(Ed.)Pillai, R.(Ed.),Bligh, M. C.(Ed.),Uhl-Bien, M.(Ed.)(2007).Follower-centered perspectives on leadership: A tribute to the memory of James R. Meindl.Greenwich, CT:Information Age.
  44. Sy, T.(2010).What do you think of followers? Examining the content, structure, and consequences of implicit followership theories.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,113(2),73-84.
  45. Teea, E. Y. J.,Paulsen, N.,Ashkanasy, N. M.(2013).Revisiting followership through a social identity perspective: The role of collective follower emotion and action.The Leadership Quarterly,24(6),902-918.
  46. Thompson, G.,Vecchio, R. P.(2009).Situational leadership theory: A test of three versions.The Leadership Quarterly,20(5),837-848.
  47. Uhl-Bien, M.,Riggio, R. E.,Lowe, K. B.,Carsten, M. K.(2014).Followership theory: A review and research agenda.The Leadership Quarterly,25(1),83-104.
  48. Walumbwa, F. O.,Wang, P.,Wang, H.,Schaubroeck, J.,Avolio, B. J.(2010).Psychological processes linking authentic leadership to follower behaviors.The Leadership Quarterly,21,901-914.
  49. Yukl, G. A.(2010).Leadership in organizations.Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice Hall.
  50. Zhu, W, Avolio, B. J.,Walumbwa, F. O.(2009).Moderating role of follower characteristics with transformational leadership and follower work engagement.Group Organization Management,34(5),590-619.
  51. Zhu, Y.,Li, D.(2016).Supervisor-subordinate Guanxi violations: Trickle-down effects beyond the dyad.Asian Business & Management,15(5),399-423.
  52. 江明修(1995)。非營利組織領導行為之研究。問題與研究,34(10),77-98。
  53. 吳明隆、涂金堂(2007)。SPSS與統計應用分析。臺北市:五南。
  54. 林孟偉(2008)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。嘉義縣,國立中正大學。
  55. 嚴奇峰(1992)。,臺北市:行政院國家科學委員會。
  56. 嚴奇峰(1991)。儒家意識型態對中國人性格的影響:命題系統及其在管理上的涵義。第一屆管理與哲學研討會論文集,桃園縣:
  57. 嚴奇峰(1993)。互動平衡理論─從儒家倫範與正義觀點探討本文和諧之人際互動關係。中原學報,22,154-164。