特質正念與團隊成員交換關係之探究－以情緒調節為中介變項

Ching-Yi Yang

doi:10.6251/BEP.202312_55(2).0004

山西大学，您好！

感谢采购，人社期刊库｜人社论文库，期间：2025/01/01~2025/12/31

感谢试用，科学期刊库｜科学论文库，期间：2025/04/01~2025/06/30

浏览高级检索

关闭
检索检索高级检索出版物检索
浏览期刊主题浏览核心期刊浏览期刊拼音浏览

关闭

查询符号(半角)	查询符号意义说明
空格	表示为「AND」两个查询词之交集
双引号 ( " " )	片语以双引号标示开始及结束，而且只寻找出现顺序相同的字词，例： " image process "
?	表示一个字母切截，输入两个?表两个字母，依此类推，例：输入「Appl?」，查得结果应为appl e , appl y … ( 常用于英文字查询 )
*	表示不限字母切截，由0~n. 例：输入「appl*」，查得结果应为appl e , appl es , appl y , appl ied , appl ication … ( 常用于英文字查询 )
AND、OR、NOT	布尔逻辑组合关键字，用来扩大或缩小查询范围的技巧。 (1) AND ：缩小查询范围 (2) OR ：扩大查询范围(3) NOT：排除不相关的范围

DOI 是数位物件识别码（ D igital O bject I dentifier ）的简称，
为物件在网路上的唯一识别码，可用于永久连结并引用目标物件。

使用DOI作为永久连结

每个DOI号前面加上「 http://dx.doi.org/ 」便成为永久网址。
如以DOI号为 10.5297/ser.1201.002 的文献为例，此文献的永久连结便是： http://dx.doi.org/ 10.5297/ser.1201.002 。
日后不论出版单位如何更动此文献位置，永久连结所指向的位置皆会即时更新，不再错失重要的研究。

引用含有DOI的文献

有DOI的文献在引用时皆应同时引用DOI。若使用APA、Chicago以外未规范DOI的引用格式，可引用DOI永久连结。

DOI可强化引用精确性、增强学术圈连结，并给予使用者跨平台的良好使用经验，目前在全世界已有超过五千万个对象申请DOI。如想对DOI的使用与概念有进一步了解，请参考（）。

ACI:

数据来源：Academic Citation Index，简称ACI

台湾最大的引用文献资料库，目前收录台湾与港澳地区所出版的人文学、社会学领域学术期刊之书目资料与参考文献，总期刊量超过690种，每年定期公布收录期刊的影响指数(Impact Factor)等指标给大众，并提供专家学者与学术单位实用的计量与分析功能。

五年影响指数（5-Year Impact Factor）：某一期刊前五年所出版的文章在当年度的平均被引用次数。

公式：（前五年发表论文在统计年的被引用次数）÷（前五年论文产出论文总篇数）

例如：A期刊2017年之五年影响指数

(A期刊2012-2016年发表论文在2017年的被引总次数)/(A期刊2012-2016年发表的论文总数)

什么是预刊文章？

为提供读者最前线之学术资讯，于期刊文献获同意刊登后、纸本印制完成前，率先于网路线上发表之文章即为预刊文章。预刊文章尚未有卷期、页次及出版日期资讯，但可藉由DOI号识别。 DOI号是文献的数位身份证字号，不论预刊或正式出版皆不会改变，读者可点击DOI连结，或于DOI号前面加上「 http://dx.doi.org/ 」连结到文献目前最新版本。

如何引用预刊文章？

请使用预刊文章的线上发表日期及DOI号来引用该篇文献。

引用范例(视不同引文格式规范可能有所差异)：

作者姓名。文章篇名。期刊名称。 YYYY/MM/DD线上预先发表。

doi:DOI 号

来源数据

P289 - 317

社会科学 > 心理学
社会科学 > 教育学

DOI： 10.6251/BEP

书目管理工具

相关连结

问题回报

全文下载

特质正念与团队成员交换关系之探究－以情绪调节为中介变项

The Relationship between Trait Mindfulness and Team Member Exchange: Emotion Regulation as the Mediators

杨静怡(Ching-Yi Yang)

教育心理学报； 55 卷 2 期 (2023 / 12 / 01) ， P289 - 317

繁体中文;英文 DOI： 10.6251/BEP.202312_55(2).0004

特质正念；情绪调节；现役官兵；团队成员交换； trait mindfulness ； emotion regulation ； active-service soldiers ； team-member exchange (TMX)

0 个人觉得这篇文章赞

摘要 │ 参考文献 (113) │ 国际计量

摘要〈TOP〉

并列摘要〈TOP〉

In the ancient military system of China, ten people cooked and ate together, named "huo ban" (Ministry of Education, 2021), which are now known as "coworkers" or "partners." Whether in ancient times or today, harmonious and supportive relationships between coworkers are crucial for the success of organizational actions. Studies pointed out that high-quality team-member exchange (TMX) has a positive impact on individual and team performance, such as improving job satisfaction (Banks et al., 2014), mental health (Schermuly & Meyer, 2016), organizational citizenship behavior (Farmer et al., 2015), or reducing turnover rates (Rutishauser & Sender, 2019). Today, we know less about what causes TMX (Chen, 2018). Influenced by positive psychological trends, scholars have begun to pay attention to the impact of mental strengths on individuals. Trait mindfulness, which emphasizes the characteristics of concentration, non-judgmental acceptance, and decentralization, is regarded as a personal mental strength. Related studies indicated that trait mindfulness can promote friendships and intimate relationships (Eby et al., 2020). In the workplace, scholars also found that trait mindfulness of employees can regulate their workplace emotions, alleviate hostility and aggressive behavior (Liang et al., 2018), enhance more cooperative behavior (Kay & Skarlicki, 2020; Masters-Waage et al., 2021), and promote positive attitudes towards the relationships with other members of the team (Hawkes & Neale, 2020). Can trait mindfulness of individuals promote the development of their supportive interactions (i.e. TMX) with peers, and how do its internal operating mechanisms arouse our interest? After reviewing relevant literature, we found that there are rare studies explored the antecedents of TMX from the perspective of an individual's mental strengths. On the other hand, with the paradigm shift of mindfulness research, more and more scholars tend to expose the potential interpersonal benefits of mindfulness. However, our understanding of the relationship between employee mindfulness and TMX in the workplace is still limited. Although Hawkes and Neale (2020) had already researched the relationship between trait mindfulness, emotional regulation, and TMX. However, this study was conducted in a Western context. Will cultural differences have an impact on their research results? We are curious about this. To fill the research gap and enhance our understanding of the interpersonal benefits of mindfulness in the context of Eastern culture, we took officers and soldiers who rely more on teamwork as the research object, explored the relationship between their trait mindfulness and TMX quality, and verified the mediating effect of two emotion regulation strategies. We invited 336 active duty officers and soldiers who had served in the military for more than one year to participate in the study and to complete online questionnaires. All data were analyzed by SPSS 21 (IBM). Hierarchical multiple regression equations were conducted to investigate the relationship between mindfulness and TMX, with control variables entered in Step 1, followed by mindfulness in Step 2, and reappraisal and suppression in Step 3. The SPSS macro PROCESS (model 4) was employed to investigate the significance of mediating pathways between mindfulness and TMX via bootstrapping analyses (Hayes, 2018). The results are summarized as follows: 1. This result indicated that trait mindfulness is related to high-quality TMX. As the level of trait mindfulness increases, objects in this study express a greater willingness to support and assist other team members. And at the same time, they are abler to feel the recognition and feedback from other team members. In the past, Nonose et al. (2014) pointed out that personal mental traits (such as emotional intelligence and metacognition) are related to team collaboration relationships and performance. This study confirmed the potential correlation between mental traits (i.e. "trait mindfulness") and high-quality team member interactions again, and revealed that personal trait mindfulness has positive benefits for maintaining and developing supportive interaction among team members. 2. There was a positive correlation between trait mindfulness and cognitive reappraisal strategy, but no significant correlation with suppression strategy. We found that individuals with higher levels of trait mindfulness tend to use the cognitive reappraisal strategy. The result was consistent with previous studies (Cheung & Ng, 2020; Dubert et al., 2016; Hanley & Garland, 2014; Hawkes & Neale, 2020). In contrast, we found an insignificant positive correlation between trait mindfulness and suppression strategy (β = .09, p > .05). This research result was inconsistent with previous ones. In the past, Hayes et al. (1996) pointed out that the characteristics of mindfulness emphasize openness, acceptance, and no avoidance, which is different from the way of suppressing emotions. Therefore, he advocated mindfulness one is more willing to express their emotions and decrease emotional suppression. Empirical studies have also pointed out a negative correlation between adult trait mindfulness and suppression emotion strategies (Prakash, Whitmoyer, et al., 2015). Alternatively, enhancing one's level of mindfulness through mindfulness intervention can effectively reduce the use of emotional suppression strategies (Greeson et al., 2018; Reber et al., 2013). We do not know what factors caused the differences in research results, and we believe that we can continue to explore the reasons behind them in the future. 3. There was a positive correlation between the cognitive reappraisal strategy and TMX, but the relationship between the suppression strategy and TMX was not significant. This study indicated that the adaptive emotional regulation strategy (i.e. cognitive reappraisal strategy) has a high explanatory power for TMX (β = .49, p < .001). It implied that the higher the tendency to use the cognitive reappraisal strategy, the higher the willingness to support team members, and the more often they experience recognition and support from other team members. However, we found the negative correlation between the suppression strategy and TMX was not significant. In the past, most scholars believed that people who have been depressed for a long time are prone to interpersonal alienation, and are not easy to provide social support (Butler et al., 2003; Gross, 2002; Gross & John, 2003). So we assumed that people who use the suppression strategy more often have lower TMX performance. But this hypothesis did not been supported. We speculated that the inconsistent research results may be due to cultural differences. Wei et al. (2013) indicated that compared to Westerners, Chinese people tend to use suppression strategies more often to maintain interpersonal harmony. It implied that in Chinese culture, suppression strategy may not always be related to negative interpersonal interaction behavior. It can lead to different behavioral manifestations depending on the purpose or timing of the application. 4. The cognitive reappraisal strategy had a mediating effect between trait mindfulness and TMX, while the suppression strategy did not. In addition, we found that individuals with higher levels of trait mindfulness were more likely to establish better relationships with team members, partly because they tended to use adaptive emotional regulation strategy (i.e. cognitive reappraisal strategy) more often to handle their interpersonal emotions. In summary, this study provided empirical support for trait mindfulness in enhancing interpersonal interactions among team members, especially in the sense of reciprocity. Previous studies have pointed out that high-quality TMX has positive benefits in promoting personal health and work performance (Banks et al., 2014), thus emphasizing the importance of developing supportive interactions in team organizations. According to the results of this study, we supposed that cultivating individuals' trait mindfulness and adaptive emotion regulation ability may be one of the methods to help individuals develop supportive interactions such as reciprocity and cooperation. Finally, we suggested that organizations hold regular mindfulness activities for their members and encourage them to engage in self-practice. Furthermore, managers in organizations could also provide appropriate working conditions, such as a reasonable workload and sufficient rest time, allowing members to have enough energy resources to maintain attention and awareness of the present (Hülsheger et al., 2018).

参考文献 ( 113 ) 〈TOP〉

江文慈, W.-T.(2012)。大学生人际互动情绪表达压抑的探究。教育心理学报，43，657-680。
连结：
张仁和, J -H.,林以正, Y.-C.,黄金兰, C. -L.(2011)。中文版「止观觉察注意量表」之信效度分析。测验学刊，58，235-260。
连结：
粘瑞狄, J.-T.,吴治翰, C.-H.,吴聪义, T.-Y.,杨高腾, K.-T.,裕祥, Y.-H.,张育恺, Y.-K.(2020)。正念、正念训练与心理健康：预设模式网络之观点。教育心理学报，52，219-240。
连结：
潘俊廷, C.-T.,王沂钊, Y. -C.(2022)。台湾大学生评价恐惧、情绪表达冲突与自我关怀之关联性研究。教育心理学报，54，307-332。
连结：
苏琳, L.,陈畹兰, W.-L.,谢颖慧, Y.-H.,高可霓, K.-N.(2015)。性格特质、情绪调节与忧郁情绪：比较不同性别和情境的调节效果。中华心理卫生学刊，28，569-603。
连结：

国际计量

〈TOP〉

E-mail ：

文章公开取用时，将寄通知信至您填写的信箱地址