國中輔導教師介入關係霸凌事件的輔導困境與策略

杜淑芬; 鄧文章; 陳亦鳳

doi:10.6251/BEP.202109_53(1).0010

山西大学，您好！

感谢采购，人社期刊库｜人社论文库，期间：2024/01/01~2024/12/31

感谢试用，科学期刊库｜科学论文库，期间：2024/10/20~2025/01/20

浏览高级检索

关闭
检索检索高级检索出版物检索
浏览期刊主题浏览核心期刊浏览期刊拼音浏览

关闭

查询符号(半角)	查询符号意义说明
空格	表示为「AND」两个查询词之交集
双引号 ( " " )	片语以双引号标示开始及结束，而且只寻找出现顺序相同的字词，例： " image process "
?	表示一个字母切截，输入两个?表两个字母，依此类推，例：输入「Appl?」，查得结果应为appl e , appl y … ( 常用于英文字查询 )
*	表示不限字母切截，由0~n. 例：输入「appl*」，查得结果应为appl e , appl es , appl y , appl ied , appl ication … ( 常用于英文字查询 )
AND、OR、NOT	布尔逻辑组合关键字，用来扩大或缩小查询范围的技巧。 (1) AND ：缩小查询范围 (2) OR ：扩大查询范围(3) NOT：排除不相关的范围

DOI 是数位物件识别码（ D igital O bject I dentifier ）的简称，
为物件在网路上的唯一识别码，可用于永久连结并引用目标物件。

使用DOI作为永久连结

每个DOI号前面加上「 http://dx.doi.org/ 」便成为永久网址。
如以DOI号为 10.5297/ser.1201.002 的文献为例，此文献的永久连结便是： http://dx.doi.org/ 10.5297/ser.1201.002 。
日后不论出版单位如何更动此文献位置，永久连结所指向的位置皆会即时更新，不再错失重要的研究。

引用含有DOI的文献

有DOI的文献在引用时皆应同时引用DOI。若使用APA、Chicago以外未规范DOI的引用格式，可引用DOI永久连结。

DOI可强化引用精确性、增强学术圈连结，并给予使用者跨平台的良好使用经验，目前在全世界已有超过五千万个对象申请DOI。如想对DOI的使用与概念有进一步了解，请参考（）。

ACI:

数据来源：Academic Citation Index，简称ACI

台湾最大的引用文献资料库，目前收录台湾与港澳地区所出版的人文学、社会学领域学术期刊之书目资料与参考文献，总期刊量超过690种，每年定期公布收录期刊的影响指数(Impact Factor)等指标给大众，并提供专家学者与学术单位实用的计量与分析功能。

五年影响指数（5-Year Impact Factor）：某一期刊前五年所出版的文章在当年度的平均被引用次数。

公式：（前五年发表论文在统计年的被引用次数）÷（前五年论文产出论文总篇数）

例如：A期刊2017年之五年影响指数

(A期刊2012-2016年发表论文在2017年的被引总次数)/(A期刊2012-2016年发表的论文总数)

什么是预刊文章？

为提供读者最前线之学术资讯，于期刊文献获同意刊登后、纸本印制完成前，率先于网路线上发表之文章即为预刊文章。预刊文章尚未有卷期、页次及出版日期资讯，但可藉由DOI号识别。 DOI号是文献的数位身份证字号，不论预刊或正式出版皆不会改变，读者可点击DOI连结，或于DOI号前面加上「 http://dx.doi.org/ 」连结到文献目前最新版本。

如何引用预刊文章？

请使用预刊文章的线上发表日期及DOI号来引用该篇文献。

引用范例(视不同引文格式规范可能有所差异)：

作者姓名。文章篇名。期刊名称。 YYYY/MM/DD线上预先发表。

doi:DOI 号

来源数据

P223 - 249

社会科学 > 心理学
社会科学 > 教育学

DOI： 10.6251/BEP

书目管理工具

相关连结

问题回报

全文下载

国中辅导教师介入关系霸凌事件的辅导困境与策略

Counselors' Difficulties and Strategies When Intervening in Relational Bullying Incidents

杜淑芬(Su-Fen Tu) ；邓文章(Wen-Chang Teng) ；陈亦凤(Yi-Feng Chen)

教育心理学报； 53 卷 1 期 (2021 / 09 / 01) ， P223 - 249

繁体中文 DOI： 10.6251/BEP.202109_53(1).0010

霸凌辅导；关系攻击；关系霸凌；辅导策略；辅导困境； bullying intervention ； relational aggression ； relational bullying ； counseling strategies ； counseling difficulties

0 个人觉得这篇文章赞

摘要 │ 参考文献 (68) │ 被引用文献 (3) │ 国际计量

摘要〈TOP〉

并列摘要〈TOP〉

Relational bullying is a prevalent phenomenon that is commonly observed among peers in schools, particularly middle schools. The victims of relational bullying are affected by severe social and psychological adjustment problems; moreover, these interpersonal adjustment problems continue to affect them in subsequent phases of their lives. Studies have revealed an association between reductions in school bullying incidents and the presence of teachers who are sensitive to relational problems and capable of providing competent class management as well as positive behavioral and emotional support and praise to students. Preventive programs that emphasize the development of students' empathy, prosocial behaviors, emotional management, and interpersonal social skills were demonstrated to be effective in reducing relational aggression. Studies have examined the interventions and counseling provided after the occurrence of bullying events and discovered that school counselors mostly worked with victims through individual and group counseling; however, these studies have also suggested the establishment of teacher-parent collaborations to stop bullying. Purpose: This study explored counselors' difficulties and strategies when they intervene in relational bullying incidents in schools. Method: In total, 27 school counselors (comprising 22 females and 5 male counselors) were interviewed in a group setting. The participants had an average age of 34.5 years and an average of 8.31 and 5.59 years of teaching and counseling experience, respectively. They all had experiences of intervening in relational bullying incidents, with 11.1%, 18.9%, 51.8%, and 14.8% of them having intervened in one, two, three, and four incidents, respectively. The participants were divided into five groups, and a group interview lasting 2 to 3 h was conducted for each group. The guidelines for the group interviews comprised four items, namely (i) relational intervention experience (i.e., sharing of experiences in intervening in students' relational bullying incidents), (ii) identification experience (i.e., how incidents were identified or confirmed as relational bullying incidents), (iii) strategies (i.e., sharing of intervening strategies applied to involved students [instigators and victims], bystanders, and other individuals in response to the occurrence of incidents), and (iv) difficulties (i.e., sharing of difficulties encountered when intervening in incidents and the methods used to overcome these difficulties). Data analysis was conducted in the form of template analysis, and the draft of the first group was used to establish the initial category template, after which the categories were amended or revised per the data generated during the analysis. The kappa coefficient for the raters was determined to be .84 after two rounds of adjustments. A group of 10 school counselors were invited to evaluate the draft's credibility, completeness, closeness, and applicability; on a 7-point scale, the raters gave scores ranging from 6.33 to 6.67. Results: The difficulties encountered by counselors who intervened in relational aggression incidents were as follows: (i) Difficulties in identifying relational bullying: The counselors reported that they felt constrained and confused when they had to identify the roles of the individuals involved in relational bullying incidents. An involved student might claim that he or she felt ostracized by his or her classmates even though no one had acted aggressively against them, or they might have been the instigator. In other cases, students might have repeatedly acted aggressively against each other but still claim that they were bullied. (ii) Difficulties in conducting individual counseling: The counselors experienced difficulties in aiding victims, particularly those who lacked social skills and were resistant to change and those who resisted counseling because they felt that they were being blamed. Furthermore, a few counselors were also concerned that their countertransference might hurt the involved students because of the frustrations that they experienced when interacting with stubborn victims. Another challenge was counseling bullies; these instigators had interpersonal advantages and general adopted the avoidant strategy of denial. Some accused instigators also claimed that they felt hurt and became defensive during counseling sessions. (iii) Difficulties in establishing systematic collaboration: First, the counselors reported that they conducted group counseling with the involved classes but encountered difficulties because they had no previous experiences of interacting with these classes. Second, collaboration with homeroom teachers was another challenge because many of these teachers lacked the skills to identify relational bullying in their classes and provide guidance in response to relational bullying incidents; in some cases, the situation was made worse by the use of inappropriate interventional strategies. Moreover, working with parents could be a complex matter; occasionally, these parents were overprotective or too emotional involved in their children's relational problems. Some parents also insisted on verifying the actual roles of the individuals involved in an incident; thus, they neglected the psychological well-being of the involved students. The strategic component of the results indicated that an integrated interventional strategy that incorporated both individual and systematic interventions was optimal for addressing relational aggression events involving relational bullying incidents. The counselors reported that they were able to alleviate the students' trauma when they set aside the concept of identifying the instigator or investigating the incident and accepted the volatile nature of interpersonal relationships among adolescents. When providing counseling to clients who were victims, a counselor empathized and respected a client's subjective perception of the incidents and devoted their efforts toward assisting client's interpersonal skills' development and relational restoration with peers. The counselors revealed that empathic listening and rapport relationships were especially important when working with aggressors; also, if a teacher, possibly with the help of a counselor, could make good use of aggressors' interpersonal power, the whole class would have benefited from this effort. In addition, a counselor could apply mediation to resolve conflicts if agreement could be reached between both parties. When intervening in bullying incidents, counselors reported that the most frequently used strategy was a team-based one that involved homeroom teachers, heads of discipline, and special education teachers. Counselors could establish collaborative relationships with homeroom teachers when they could provide emotional support to these teachers who were coping with problematic relational bullying incidents in their classes. Most counselors conducted group counseling to release tension in a class, implementing antibullying psychoeducation programs, and promoting empathic understanding for victims with special needs (such as autistic or hyperactive students). When working with difficult parents in relational bullying incidents, the counselors revealed that empathizing with parents was the general practice because these parents often received biased information from their children. The counselors worked with parents by maintaining continual home-school communication, providing the parents with consultation services using multiple resources, or implementing these two measures simultaneously. Although enforced counseling was recommended for inclusion in school rules as a legislative means of ensuring involved students' have access to counseling when their parents or guardians are resistant to providing consent, the present study indicated that counselors must overcome multiple types of difficulties and gain the support of parents or guardians to achieve optimal counseling effectiveness. Conclusion/Suggestion: First, both individualized and systematic interventional strategies must be applied for relational bullying incidents. Second, although role identification is essential for preparing mandatory reports, school counselors should focus on the humane roles and functions of a counselor rather than those of an investigator when intervening in bullying incidents. Therefore, we recommend that school counselors concentrate on the relationship traumas of the involved students and aid them in developing their interpersonal skills and restoring their relationships. Furthermore, school counselors must improve their systematic collaboration and consultation abilities to work with teachers and parents when intervening in such incidents. Finally, we recommend the establishment of a community resource center to provide consultation services to school counselors and staff when they encounter relational bullying incidents because they often consider identification and intervention as problems.

参考文献 ( 68 ) 〈TOP〉

王承谚, C.-Y.,李明宪, M.-S. A.(2018)。国小辅导教师实施防制霸凌课程之个案研究。学校卫生，72，15-28。
连结：
王樱芬, Y.-F.(2020)。依附、忧郁和积极因应对青少年学校生活困扰之影响性研究。教育心理学报，52(1)，191-217。
连结：
王樱芬, Y.-F.,黄瑛琪, Y.-C.,陈宛宜, W.-Y.(2019)。青少年案主观点的谘商关系体验～初探性研究。教育心理学报，50(4)，659-683。
连结：
杜淑芬, S.-F.(2018)。谘商师透过谘询与教师合作处理学生问题行为之行动研究。教育实践与研究，31(1)，39-70。
连结：
林苡彤, Y.-T.,程景琳, C.-L.(2010)。国中生关系霸凌加害者与受害者之规范信念、同理心与因应策略。台东大学教育学报，21(2)，1-28。
连结：

被引用文献 ( 3 ) 〈TOP〉

(2024)。不同网路霸凌情境的旁观者反应倾向探究：网路霸凌辨识能力、道德疏离与受害者行为的影响。教育心理学报，55(3)，491-511。
(2024)。高中职身障生校园受凌之研究──与普通生做比较。教育心理学报，56(1)，127-158。
(2024)。中学辅导教师对霸凌受害者的辅导策略分析：多向度Rasch模式。教育实践与研究，37(1)，1-34。

国际计量

〈TOP〉

E-mail ：

文章公开取用时，将寄通知信至您填写的信箱地址