論國立大專校院兼任主管職教師違失行為之法律責任－以行政責任之界限為中心

宋峻杰; 黃崇銘; 張婉慈

doi:10.6209/JORIES.202206_67(2).0007

山西大学，您好！

感谢采购，人社期刊库｜人社论文库，期间：2025/01/01~2025/12/31

感谢试用，科学期刊库｜科学论文库，期间：2025/04/01~2025/06/30

浏览高级检索

关闭
检索检索高级检索出版物检索
浏览期刊主题浏览核心期刊浏览期刊拼音浏览

关闭

查询符号(半角)	查询符号意义说明
空格	表示为「AND」两个查询词之交集
双引号 ( " " )	片语以双引号标示开始及结束，而且只寻找出现顺序相同的字词，例： " image process "
?	表示一个字母切截，输入两个?表两个字母，依此类推，例：输入「Appl?」，查得结果应为appl e , appl y … ( 常用于英文字查询 )
*	表示不限字母切截，由0~n. 例：输入「appl*」，查得结果应为appl e , appl es , appl y , appl ied , appl ication … ( 常用于英文字查询 )
AND、OR、NOT	布尔逻辑组合关键字，用来扩大或缩小查询范围的技巧。 (1) AND ：缩小查询范围 (2) OR ：扩大查询范围(3) NOT：排除不相关的范围

DOI 是数位物件识别码（ D igital O bject I dentifier ）的简称，
为物件在网路上的唯一识别码，可用于永久连结并引用目标物件。

使用DOI作为永久连结

每个DOI号前面加上「 http://dx.doi.org/ 」便成为永久网址。
如以DOI号为 10.5297/ser.1201.002 的文献为例，此文献的永久连结便是： http://dx.doi.org/ 10.5297/ser.1201.002 。
日后不论出版单位如何更动此文献位置，永久连结所指向的位置皆会即时更新，不再错失重要的研究。

引用含有DOI的文献

有DOI的文献在引用时皆应同时引用DOI。若使用APA、Chicago以外未规范DOI的引用格式，可引用DOI永久连结。

DOI可强化引用精确性、增强学术圈连结，并给予使用者跨平台的良好使用经验，目前在全世界已有超过五千万个对象申请DOI。如想对DOI的使用与概念有进一步了解，请参考（）。

ACI:

数据来源：Academic Citation Index，简称ACI

台湾最大的引用文献资料库，目前收录台湾与港澳地区所出版的人文学、社会学领域学术期刊之书目资料与参考文献，总期刊量超过690种，每年定期公布收录期刊的影响指数(Impact Factor)等指标给大众，并提供专家学者与学术单位实用的计量与分析功能。

五年影响指数（5-Year Impact Factor）：某一期刊前五年所出版的文章在当年度的平均被引用次数。

公式：（前五年发表论文在统计年的被引用次数）÷（前五年论文产出论文总篇数）

例如：A期刊2017年之五年影响指数

(A期刊2012-2016年发表论文在2017年的被引总次数)/(A期刊2012-2016年发表的论文总数)

什么是预刊文章？

为提供读者最前线之学术资讯，于期刊文献获同意刊登后、纸本印制完成前，率先于网路线上发表之文章即为预刊文章。预刊文章尚未有卷期、页次及出版日期资讯，但可藉由DOI号识别。 DOI号是文献的数位身份证字号，不论预刊或正式出版皆不会改变，读者可点击DOI连结，或于DOI号前面加上「 http://dx.doi.org/ 」连结到文献目前最新版本。

如何引用预刊文章？

请使用预刊文章的线上发表日期及DOI号来引用该篇文献。

引用范例(视不同引文格式规范可能有所差异)：

作者姓名。文章篇名。期刊名称。 YYYY/MM/DD线上预先发表。

doi:DOI 号

来源数据

P185 - 211

社会科学 > 教育学

DOI： 10.6209/JORIES

书目管理工具

相关连结

问题回报

全文下载

论国立大专校院兼任主管职教师违失行为之法律责任－以行政责任之界限为中心

On the Misconduct of Teachers With Administrative Duties at the National College and University: Centering on the Limits of Administrative Liability

宋峻杰(Chun-Chieh Sung) ；黄崇铭(Chung-Ming Huang) ；张婉慈(Wan-Tzu Chang)

教育科学研究期刊； 67 卷 2 期 (2022 / 06 / 01) ， P185 - 211

繁体中文 DOI： 10.6209/JORIES.202206_67(2).0007

公教分途；合目的性监督；兼任主管职教师违失；高等教育；违失行为； separation of government functionary and teacher ； purposeful supervision ； teachers with administrative duties ； higher education ； malfeasance in public office

0 个人觉得这篇文章赞

摘要 │ 参考文献 (50) │ 国际计量

摘要〈TOP〉

并列摘要〈TOP〉

Universities are centers of teaching and research. Additionally, universities play an foundational role in social and economic development. In the United States, teachers are often regarded as social servants and are an indicator of their ability to implement curriculum. In Taiwan, article 1, paragraph 1 of the University Act states that the purpose of a university is ＂to research, nurture talent, enhance the culture, [provide] service to society and promote national development [...].＂ In addition, article 1, item 1 of the Junior College Act stipulates that ＂colleges and universities shall teach and promote applied science and technology, cultivate employability, and develop practical professionals.＂ Since 2017, Taiwan's government has proposed and promoted projects such as the University Social Responsibility Practice Plan and the Higher Education Deepening Project, which focus on the implementation of university social responsibility (USR). USR encourages university teachers and students to improve their academic research and partake in social development activities. Therefore, Taiwan's government should adopt a positive and supportive stance toward engagement with faculty members in off-campus professional activities and promoting USR. This paper thus analyzes university teacher behavior from the perspectives of laws and regulations and behavioral management as well as the role of the state. The focus is on teachers who are engaging in supervisory duties. Because this paper focuses on the analysis of academic theories and legal regulations, we adopted the qualitative research method of document analysis. The focal documents are mainly legal and regulatory documents, including Interpretation No. 308, administrative letters, court decisions, and impeachment cases of the Control Yuan. Additionally, we engage in a comparison of Taiwan's relevant legal regime with those of other nations. Ultimately, we determined that Interpretation No. 308 is not only at odds with Taiwan's constitution and jurisprudence protecting the academic freedom of university teachers and universities' autonomy but also with the principles of higher education administration. The central education administration still relies only on Interpretation No. 308 to maintain that the Civil Service Law and the related laws and regulations derived from it must be applied to university teachers who hold supervisory positions; yet, this violates the Statutory Doctrine of Higher Education established in constitutional jurisprudence and other interpretations of the Judicial Yuan. Although this article does not abandon the logic of the legal system, it provides some suggestions for the central educational administration to implement the ＂minimum necessary degree of purposeful supervision.＂ However, two actions are necessary to do so. First, people may need to petition the Constitutional Court to reconsider or overrule Interpretation No. 308. This would be similar to urging the Justice Court to implement the Supplementary Interpretation that was mandated before the publication and implementation of the Constitutional Court Procedure Act. According to article 42, paragraph 2 of the Constitutional Court Procedure Act, which came into force in January 2019, if the people determine and judge that the legal norms that have been interpreted as constitutional by the Judicial Yuan or if significant changes in social circumstances occur, they may appeal to the Constitutional Court for review. If the academic community agrees that Interpretation No. 308 infringes on the autonomy of the university, the relevant parties should follow the provisions and procedures set forth in the same law to request the Constitutional Court to review whether Interpretation No. 308 remains appropriate. Second, to implement the Statutory Doctrine of Higher Education in the administration of higher education and clarify the supervisory authority of the central education administration, this paper argues that the highest legislature of Taiwan should reference the Japanese Educational Civil Service Law or the precedent of legalizing national universities. Moreover, the legislature should clearly define the areas in which the state can intervene in national basic education and higher education to protect teachers and their rights. Doing so would improve the operation of the Taiwanese higher education system.

参考文献 ( 50 ) 〈TOP〉

王怡惠（2016，11月21日）。美国大学专任教师兼职活动之利益冲突管理规范（上）：公立加州大学。科技政策观点。http://doi.org/10.6916/STPIRP.2016-11-21【Wang, Y.-H. (2016, November 21). Conflict of interest regulation for part-time activities of full-time faculty at U.S. universities (above): Public University of California. Research Porttal. http://doi.org/10.6916/STPIRP.2016-11-21】
连结：
许育典、李佳育（2014）。从大学的法律地位探讨大学自治的落实：以大学法人化为核心。当代教育研究季刊，22（1），169-209。http://doi.org/10.6151/CERQ.2014.2201.05【Hsu, Y.-D., & Li, J.-Y. (2014). A review of the implementation of university autonomy from the perspective of the legal status of universities: Focusing on the legal personalization of universities. Contemporary Educational Research Quarterly, 22(1), 169-209. http://doi.org/10.6151/CERQ.2014.2201.05】
连结：
谢煜伟（2015）。论授权公务员概念。国立台湾大学法学论丛，44（3），971-1035。http://doi. org/10.6199/NTULJ.2015.44.03.05【Hsieh, Y.-W. (2015). On the concept of “authorized public servant” in Criminal Law. National Taiwan University Law Journal, 44(3), 971-1035. http://doi.org/10.6199/NTULJ.2015.44.03.05】
连结：
羽田贵史（1987）。戦後教育改革と教育‧研究の自由─教育公务员特例法の成立过程における自由规定の検讨。教育学研究，54（4），382-392。https://doi.org/10.11555/kyoiku1932.　54.382【Tanaka, M. (1987). The academic freedom of teachers in the educational reforms of postwar Japan. The Japanese Journal of Educational Research, 54(4), 382-392. https://doi.org/10.11555/kyoiku1932.54.382】
连结：
高桥寛人（2019）。教育公务员特例法制定过程の研究　占领下における教员身分保障制度改革构想。春风社。https://doi.org/10.15062/kyouikushigaku.63.0_185 【Takahashi, H. (2019). A study of the enactment process of the Law for the Special Regulations Concerning Educational Public Service: The concept of reforming the teacher status security system under the occupation. Shumpusha. https://doi.org/10.15062/kyouikushigaku.63.0_185】
连结：

国际计量

〈TOP〉

E-mail ：

文章公开取用时，将寄通知信至您填写的信箱地址