大學人事與薪資管理制度改革之研究－以日本國立大學法人為例

李宜麟; 楊思偉

doi:10.6209/JORIES.202206_67(2).0008

山西大学，您好！

感谢采购，人社期刊库｜人社论文库，期间：2024/01/01~2024/12/31

感谢试用，科学期刊库｜科学论文库，期间：2024/10/20~2025/01/20

浏览高级检索

关闭
检索检索高级检索出版物检索
浏览期刊主题浏览核心期刊浏览期刊拼音浏览

关闭

查询符号(半角)	查询符号意义说明
空格	表示为「AND」两个查询词之交集
双引号 ( " " )	片语以双引号标示开始及结束，而且只寻找出现顺序相同的字词，例： " image process "
?	表示一个字母切截，输入两个?表两个字母，依此类推，例：输入「Appl?」，查得结果应为appl e , appl y … ( 常用于英文字查询 )
*	表示不限字母切截，由0~n. 例：输入「appl*」，查得结果应为appl e , appl es , appl y , appl ied , appl ication … ( 常用于英文字查询 )
AND、OR、NOT	布尔逻辑组合关键字，用来扩大或缩小查询范围的技巧。 (1) AND ：缩小查询范围 (2) OR ：扩大查询范围(3) NOT：排除不相关的范围

DOI 是数位物件识别码（ D igital O bject I dentifier ）的简称，
为物件在网路上的唯一识别码，可用于永久连结并引用目标物件。

使用DOI作为永久连结

每个DOI号前面加上「 http://dx.doi.org/ 」便成为永久网址。
如以DOI号为 10.5297/ser.1201.002 的文献为例，此文献的永久连结便是： http://dx.doi.org/ 10.5297/ser.1201.002 。
日后不论出版单位如何更动此文献位置，永久连结所指向的位置皆会即时更新，不再错失重要的研究。

引用含有DOI的文献

有DOI的文献在引用时皆应同时引用DOI。若使用APA、Chicago以外未规范DOI的引用格式，可引用DOI永久连结。

DOI可强化引用精确性、增强学术圈连结，并给予使用者跨平台的良好使用经验，目前在全世界已有超过五千万个对象申请DOI。如想对DOI的使用与概念有进一步了解，请参考（）。

ACI:

数据来源：Academic Citation Index，简称ACI

台湾最大的引用文献资料库，目前收录台湾与港澳地区所出版的人文学、社会学领域学术期刊之书目资料与参考文献，总期刊量超过690种，每年定期公布收录期刊的影响指数(Impact Factor)等指标给大众，并提供专家学者与学术单位实用的计量与分析功能。

五年影响指数（5-Year Impact Factor）：某一期刊前五年所出版的文章在当年度的平均被引用次数。

公式：（前五年发表论文在统计年的被引用次数）÷（前五年论文产出论文总篇数）

例如：A期刊2017年之五年影响指数

(A期刊2012-2016年发表论文在2017年的被引总次数)/(A期刊2012-2016年发表的论文总数)

什么是预刊文章？

为提供读者最前线之学术资讯，于期刊文献获同意刊登后、纸本印制完成前，率先于网路线上发表之文章即为预刊文章。预刊文章尚未有卷期、页次及出版日期资讯，但可藉由DOI号识别。 DOI号是文献的数位身份证字号，不论预刊或正式出版皆不会改变，读者可点击DOI连结，或于DOI号前面加上「 http://dx.doi.org/ 」连结到文献目前最新版本。

如何引用预刊文章？

请使用预刊文章的线上发表日期及DOI号来引用该篇文献。

引用范例(视不同引文格式规范可能有所差异)：

作者姓名。文章篇名。期刊名称。 YYYY/MM/DD线上预先发表。

doi:DOI 号

来源数据

P213 - 242

社会科学 > 教育学

DOI： 10.6209/JORIES

书目管理工具

相关连结

问题回报

全文下载

大学人事与薪资管理制度改革之研究－以日本国立大学法人为例

Innovations in the Personnel and Pay System for National University Corporations in Japan

李宜麟(Yi-Lin Lee) ；杨思伟(Szu-Wei Yang)

教育科学研究期刊； 67 卷 2 期 (2022 / 06 / 01) ， P213 - 242

繁体中文 DOI： 10.6209/JORIES.202206_67(2).0008

人事制度；日本；国立大学法人；绩效评监；绩效薪给制度； personnel system ； Japan ； national university corporation ； performance assessment ； merit-pay system

0 个人觉得这篇文章赞

摘要 │ 参考文献 (42) │ 国际计量

摘要〈TOP〉

并列摘要〈TOP〉

Due to globalization, competition and exchanges between countries around the world have increased. The quality of higher education maintained a key role enhancing national competitiveness and accelerating social development. An robust system was an important foundation for governance, and without a strong institutional foundation, developing modern governance capabilities and establishing or supporting world-class universities and first-class disciplines for a long time were challenging. The governance of higher education institutions should a focus for empowering higher education institutions. Therefore, all countries were committed to reforming the governance of higher education institutions to ensure that higher education was of high quality. In Japan, because society has increasingly high expectations of universities, the requirements for universities have increased. To realize the basic mission of higher education institutions, national university corporations and institutions have strengthened education (teaching) and research capacity and implemented substantial governance reforms. Reaching consensus regarding the vision of each institution and the standards required for membership through dialogue was necessary; the importance of maintaining and enhancing the positive attitude of each faculty member should be emphasized. Therefore, the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) has systematically disclosed its intention to implement reforms in various documents and has continued to promote reforms in personnel and salary management. Regarding the personnel system and salaries in universities, the MEXT proposed ＂a new personnel system based on competency and performanceism [sic]＂ in the ＂Policies for the Structural Reform of Universities (National Universities)＂ in June 2001. Since then, the MEXT has focused on the personnel system as the main policy area to strengthen the enthusiasm and ability of the teaching staff, especially by implementing an attractive salary system, changing the age structure of teachers, and recruiting more young scholars, among others; these measures could help attract diverse and outstanding talents. The system was focused on improving the overall outcomes of Japanese university education and research. Subsequently, reforms in personnel and salary management in universities were intensely promoted in the ＂Basic Policy on Economic and Fiscal Management and Reform 2018,＂ ＂Future Investment Strategy 2018,＂ ＂Integrated Innovation Strategy,＂ and other decision-making documents released by the Cabinet Secretariat. In February 2019, the MEXT officially issued the ＂Guidelines for Reform Management of Personnel Affairs and Salaries for National University Corporations＂ to provide relevant guidelines for compensation management in national university corporations to improve their personnel management systems. Reforms in personnel and salary management include strengthening the evaluation system, reflecting the results of the regular appraisal of salaries, and improving the promotion and bonus systems for performance-based and differentiated treatment. The MEXT recommended that universities adjust the allocation ratio of ＂fixed salary＂ (basic salary) and ＂variable salary＂ (performance salary) in the salary structure, decrease the fixed salary, and increase the ratio of the variable salary per the new ＂annual salary system＂ measures. It made the performance evaluations twice a year were emphasized more strongly than before, and the evaluation results correspond to differences in the salaries of university teachers, thereby leading to a salary system that offers ＂different pay for different performance.＂ The MEXT has emphasized continuous reforms in personnel management to enable national university corporations to better satisfy societal expectations and fulfil their responsibilities and functions and to further strengthen their governance systems; the reforms included performance evaluations, the introduction of an annual salary system, cross appointments, a double-track contract system, and lifetime employment. According to a 2021 report by the Directorate General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics of the Executive Yuan, more than 60% of full-time teachers in higher education institutions in Taiwan were older than 50, and only 8.5% of teachers were younger than 39. The identity of the full-time teachers in Taiwan University was unclear, the rights and interests of the project teachers were different, the evaluation result of the flexible salary system was unclear, and the system of industry-academia cooperation was not sufficiently flexible. These problems how to solve should be addressed. With the increase in global competition, talent recruitment and retention were no longer local issues, and competition for talented individuals from other countries was common in the world. In 2010, the Ministry of Education and Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan announced ＂The Ministry of Education Recruits and Retains Special Talents from Colleges and Universities to Implement Flexible Salary Plans,＂ with the aim of improving the academic environment of colleges and universities and increasing the incentives for retaining and recruiting talents. In 2013, the Department of Higher Education attempted to relax the requirements of personnel management for higher education institutions through ＂Measures for Unwinding the Higher Education System,＂ including ＂releasing the teacher promotion system,＂ ＂relaxing the employment of university supervisors,＂ ＂relaxing the school affairs fund,＂ and ＂recruitment flexibility.＂ In the following year, the Department of Higher Education proposed the Taiwan Talent Promotion Program to emphasize the goals of ＂attracting international outstanding talents,＂ ＂building an international talent cooperation network,＂ and ＂strengthening international academic influence and visibility.＂ These reforms were different from the reform policies in Japan. This study explored the literature and documents on the strategies and effects of innovations aimed at promoting a meritocratic personnel and merit pay system in national university corporations in Japan. First, in this paper, the current personnel and merit pay system in Taiwan and the problems associated with it were described. The study analyzed the background and procedure of innovation in the personnel and pay system of national university corporations in Japan. The system of national university corporation has been implemented since 2004, with every six years considered a period. When entering the fourth period, a performance-linked pay system was emphasized. Next, in this paper, the goals and key points, situation, problems and resolutions, strategies, and effects of the innovations in the personnel system were discussed. The recent reforms in the personnel and pay systems were compared between Taiwan and Japan. The findings of this study could be summarized as follows: 1. Innovations in the personnel and merit pay system of national university corporations in Japan constituted a part of the reforms in the national university corporation. 2. Innovations in the personnel and merit pay system of the national university corporations have enabled them to transform their new positions and optimize their organizational structures. 3. The linkage between performance assessment and treatment has increased teachers' dedication and their motivation to work hard. 4. The flow of external funds and the system of cross appointment has ensured the ＂employment of young teachers＂ and the ＂diversity and mobility of talents.＂ The suggestions of this study were as follows: 1. Innovations in the personnel and pay system in higher education institutions in Taiwan should be implemented based on the position of higher education institutions. 2. Related measures should be adopted after implementing a pay system based on performance. 3. It was needed to be estimated when taking Japan as an example.

参考文献 ( 42 ) 〈TOP〉

石井まこと（2015）。大学「改革」と自治‧労使関系産业竞争力に资する大学「改革」への批判的考察。労务理论学会志，24，109-121。https://doi.org/10.24502/jalm.24.0_109【Makoto, I. (2015). University autonomy and industrial relations in the university “Reform”: Comments on university “Reform” focusing on industrial competitiveness. Japan Academy of Labar and Management, 24, 109-121. https://doi.org/10.24502/jalm.24.0_109】
连结：
林隆之（2021）。大学改革政策の展开と新たな大学像の模索。研究　技术　计画，36（3），257-270。https://doi.org/10.20801/jsrpim.36.3_257【Hayashi, T. (2021). University reform policy and the new image of university. Journal of Science Policy and Research Management, 36(3), 257-270. https://doi.org/10.20801/jsrpim.36.3_257】
连结：
全国法规资料库（2004）。公立学校教职员叙薪办法。https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/Law History.aspx?pcode=H0150012【Laws & Regulations Database of the Republic China. (2004). Act of Salary of Faculty and Staff in Public Schools. https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawHistory.aspx?pcode=H0150012】
全国法规资料库（2014）。教育人员任用条例。https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx? pcode=H0150017【Laws & Regulations Database of the Republic China. (2014). Act Governing the Appointment of Educators. https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=H0150017】
全国法规资料库（2015）。教师待遇条例。https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode= H0150046【Laws & Regulations Database of the Republic China. (2015). Teacher Remuneration Act. https://law.moj.gov.tw/ LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=H0150046】

国际计量

〈TOP〉

E-mail ：

文章公开取用时，将寄通知信至您填写的信箱地址