臺灣幼兒電子產品的使用及對幼兒發展的影響：臺灣幼兒發展調查資料庫之運用

楊婧; 張鑑如

doi:10.6251/BEP.202112_53(2).0001

山西大学，您好！

感谢采购，人社期刊库｜人社论文库，期间：2024/01/01~2024/12/31

感谢试用，科学期刊库｜科学论文库，期间：2024/10/20~2025/01/20

浏览高级检索

关闭
检索检索高级检索出版物检索
浏览期刊主题浏览核心期刊浏览期刊拼音浏览

关闭

查询符号(半角)	查询符号意义说明
空格	表示为「AND」两个查询词之交集
双引号 ( " " )	片语以双引号标示开始及结束，而且只寻找出现顺序相同的字词，例： " image process "
?	表示一个字母切截，输入两个?表两个字母，依此类推，例：输入「Appl?」，查得结果应为appl e , appl y … ( 常用于英文字查询 )
*	表示不限字母切截，由0~n. 例：输入「appl*」，查得结果应为appl e , appl es , appl y , appl ied , appl ication … ( 常用于英文字查询 )
AND、OR、NOT	布尔逻辑组合关键字，用来扩大或缩小查询范围的技巧。 (1) AND ：缩小查询范围 (2) OR ：扩大查询范围(3) NOT：排除不相关的范围

DOI 是数位物件识别码（ D igital O bject I dentifier ）的简称，
为物件在网路上的唯一识别码，可用于永久连结并引用目标物件。

使用DOI作为永久连结

每个DOI号前面加上「 http://dx.doi.org/ 」便成为永久网址。
如以DOI号为 10.5297/ser.1201.002 的文献为例，此文献的永久连结便是： http://dx.doi.org/ 10.5297/ser.1201.002 。
日后不论出版单位如何更动此文献位置，永久连结所指向的位置皆会即时更新，不再错失重要的研究。

引用含有DOI的文献

有DOI的文献在引用时皆应同时引用DOI。若使用APA、Chicago以外未规范DOI的引用格式，可引用DOI永久连结。

DOI可强化引用精确性、增强学术圈连结，并给予使用者跨平台的良好使用经验，目前在全世界已有超过五千万个对象申请DOI。如想对DOI的使用与概念有进一步了解，请参考（）。

ACI:

数据来源：Academic Citation Index，简称ACI

台湾最大的引用文献资料库，目前收录台湾与港澳地区所出版的人文学、社会学领域学术期刊之书目资料与参考文献，总期刊量超过690种，每年定期公布收录期刊的影响指数(Impact Factor)等指标给大众，并提供专家学者与学术单位实用的计量与分析功能。

五年影响指数（5-Year Impact Factor）：某一期刊前五年所出版的文章在当年度的平均被引用次数。

公式：（前五年发表论文在统计年的被引用次数）÷（前五年论文产出论文总篇数）

例如：A期刊2017年之五年影响指数

(A期刊2012-2016年发表论文在2017年的被引总次数)/(A期刊2012-2016年发表的论文总数)

什么是预刊文章？

为提供读者最前线之学术资讯，于期刊文献获同意刊登后、纸本印制完成前，率先于网路线上发表之文章即为预刊文章。预刊文章尚未有卷期、页次及出版日期资讯，但可藉由DOI号识别。 DOI号是文献的数位身份证字号，不论预刊或正式出版皆不会改变，读者可点击DOI连结，或于DOI号前面加上「 http://dx.doi.org/ 」连结到文献目前最新版本。

如何引用预刊文章？

请使用预刊文章的线上发表日期及DOI号来引用该篇文献。

引用范例(视不同引文格式规范可能有所差异)：

作者姓名。文章篇名。期刊名称。 YYYY/MM/DD线上预先发表。

doi:DOI 号

来源数据

P257 - 284

社会科学 > 心理学
社会科学 > 教育学

DOI： 10.6251/BEP

书目管理工具

相关连结

问题回报

全文下载

台湾幼儿电子产品的使用及对幼儿发展的影响：台湾幼儿发展调查资料库之运用

Use of Electronic Products by Taiwanese Children and Their Effect on Children's Development: Applying Data from Kids in Taiwan Study

杨婧(Ching Yang) ；张监如(Chien-Ju Chang)

教育心理学报； 53 卷 2 期 (2021 / 12 / 01) ， P257 - 284

繁体中文 DOI： 10.6251/BEP.202112_53(2).0001

幼儿发展；幼儿时期；台湾幼儿发展调查资料库；电子产品使用； child development ； early childhood ； Kids in Taiwan ； media usage

0 个人觉得这篇文章赞

摘要 │ 参考文献 (48) │ 被引用文献 (1) │ 国际计量

摘要〈TOP〉

并列摘要〈TOP〉

Electronic products, such as televisions, smartphones, tablets, and computers, have become an integral part of our lives. Not only are these items increasingly popular but they have also changed our daily routines and communication habits. The Common Sense census (Rideout, 2017) in the United States revealed that more than 90% of children had at least one electronic product at home. In Taiwan, Wei and Chuang (2016) sampled 876 preschool children, revealing that more than 90% were exposed to electronic products and approximately 10% had started to use electronic products before the age of 2. The effect of electronic product use on children's development is a concern for parents, teachers, and researchers in the field of early childhood education. However, studies on the relationship between electronic product use and children's development have produced mixed results. This study investigated (1) the use of electronic products by 3-year-old children in Taiwan, (2) whether children from different backgrounds spent different amounts of time using electronic products, and (3) how children's usage of electronic product influences their motor, language, cognitive-attention/executive function, and emotional development. The participants in this study were 2,164 children born in Taiwan between April 1, 2013 and March 31, 2014, comprising 1,113 boys (51.4%) and 1,051 girls (48.6%). The age range of the parents in the sample was predominantly 31-40 years (59.7% of fathers, 69.8% of mothers), followed by 41-50 years (31.1% of fathers, 15.9% of mothers). This study used the Physical Movement Development Questionnaire, Language Development Questionnaire, Cognitive Development Questionnaire (Attention/Executive Function), Social Emotional Development Questionnaire, and Electronic Product Use Questionnaire developed by the Kids in Taiwan: National, Longitudinal Study of Child Development and Care project (Chang, 2019) to collect the data. The SPSS and AMOS software programs were used to perform descriptive and inferential statistics and structural equation model analyses, respectively. Seven main results were obtained from this study: (1) Only 6.8% of the children had never used electronic products. Television was the most frequently used electronic product (78%), followed by smartphones (64.8%); the least used were video game consoles (2.8%) and notebook computers (4.1%). (2) Children spent more time watching television than using other electronic products daily. On average, more than half the children (57.3%) watched television within 1.5 hours per day, and 24.8% watched television for more than 2 hours per day. More than 70% used smartphones, tablets, notebook computers, and video game consoles within 1 hour. (3) The average time boys and girls spent watching television was 102 minutes and 90 minutes, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant. No significant difference, however, was identified for the time spent using smartphones, tablets, notebook computers, or video game consoles between boys and girls. (4) In this study, the children's places of residence were divided into ＂northern,＂ ＂central,＂ ＂southern,＂ and ＂eastern.＂ The results demonstrated that no significant difference existed in the time children spent watching television in terms of place of residence (F = 1.47, p ＞ .05), but a significant difference was observed in the time children spent using smartphones, tablets, notebook computers, and video games with regard to place of residence (F = 6.34, p ＜ .001). Children living in central (M = 45.76) and southern Taiwan (M = 47.17) spent significantly more time using smartphones, tablets, notebook computers, and video games than those living in northern Taiwan (M = 37.53). (5) A significant difference was identified in time spent watching television and using smartphones, tablets, notebook computers, and video games in relation to parents' education levels. Children whose parents had not completed high school (M= 112.37) watched television and used smartphones, tablets, computers, and video games for significantly longer periods than those whose parents had graduated from university or college (M = 93.89) or held a master's degree or above (M = 65.63). (6) Children with different household incomes spent different lengths of time watching television and using smartphones, tablets, computers, and video games. Children with a monthly household income under NT$40,000 spent significantly more time watching television than those whose monthly family income ranged from NT$70,000 to NT$120,000 or was NT$120,000 and above; children with a monthly family income between NT$40,000 and NT$70,000 watched television significantly more than those whose monthly household income was between NT$70,000 and NT$120,000 or NT$120,000 and above. In addition, children with a monthly household income under NT$40,000 used smartphones, tablets, computers, and video games the longest. (7) In terms of children's development, this study found that the children who spent the most time watching television (r = -.107, p ＜ .01) and using smartphones, tablets, computers, and video games (r = -.095, p ＜ .01) had a significantly lower level of fine motor development. A similar result was identified for language development. The correlation coefficients for the relationship between children's time spent watching television and their performance in receptive language, productive language, and emergent literacy were -.043 (p ＜ .05), -.130 (p ＜ .01), and -.138 (p ＜ .01), respectively. As for the relationship between the time children spent using smartphones, tablets, computers, and video games and the three constructs of children's language development, the correlation coefficients all reached significant levels (receptive language: r = -.043, p ＜ .05; productive language: r = -.136, p ＜ .01; emergent literacy: r = -.130, p ＜ .01). The results also demonstrated a significantly negative correlation between the time children spent watching television and their attention/executive function (r = -.129, p ＜ .01). The same finding was evident in the relationship between the time children spent using smartphones, tablets, computers, and video games and their attention/executive function performance (r = -.100, p ＜ .01). With respect to children's emotional development, similar results were observed. Significantly negative relationships were identified between the time children spent watching television and children's emotional awareness (r = -.062, p ＜ .01), emotional expression (r = -.063, p ＜ .01), and emotional understanding (r = -.063, p ＜ .01). The results of the structural equation model analyses demonstrated that children's socioeconomic status (SES) could explain the time children spent using electronic products; the higher a child's SES was, the less time they spent using these products. The time children spent using electronic products was also linked to their level of development; the longer a child spent using these products, the worse their developmental level was. SES did not have a direct influence on children's development. In conclusion, this study extended previous research and revealed that the electronic products used most frequently by 3-year-old children in Taiwan were televisions and smartphones and the average time children spent watching television was higher than that recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics. Significant differences were observed in the time children spent using electronic products when children's gender, parental education level, family income, and place of residence were analyzed. Significant negative relationships were also revealed between the time children spent using electronic products and their motor, language, cognitive, and emotional development, which is consistent with previous studies. The results of this study suggest that the prolonged use of electronic products has a negative impact on the development of 3-year-old children in Taiwan. Parents, caregivers, and educators should pay more attention to the time children spend using these products.

参考文献 ( 48 ) 〈TOP〉

王馨敏, S.,李俊仁, J.-R.,张监如, C.-J.(2015)。「二至五岁幼儿认知发展家长问卷」之编制。测验学刊，62(4)，279-302。
连结：
吕信慧, H.-H.,曹峰铭, F.-M.(2018)。迟语儿幼儿期至学龄前期的语言发展型态：两年纵贯研究。教育心理学报，50(4)，685-705。
连结：
林佳慧, C.-H.,刘惠美, H.-M.,张监如, C.-J.(2019)。家庭脉络下的亲子共读与幼儿发展关系—台湾幼儿发展调查资料库的应用与分析。教育心理学报，51(1)，135-159。
连结：
张监如, C.-J.,谢淑惠, S.-H.,周丽端, L.-T.,廖凤瑞, F.-R.(2017)。幼儿发展调查资料库建置计画简介。中国统计学报，55，42-62。
连结：
张监如, C.-J.,聂西平, H.-P.,周丽端, L.-T.(2018)。当代台湾幼儿家庭基本资料、生活环境样貌及能力发展：KIT 资料库样本。人类发展与家庭学报，19，45-63。
连结：

被引用文献 ( 1 ) 〈TOP〉

锺志从,梁进龙,崔新玲,吴和堂(2023)。家庭环境与幼儿社会能力之关系──气质的调节效果。教育心理学报，55(1)，47-74。

国际计量

〈TOP〉

E-mail ：

文章公开取用时，将寄通知信至您填写的信箱地址