應用Petri-Net建構知識構圖強化適性學習診斷與學習推薦之研究

戴建耘; 葉國良; 高曼婷; 袁宇熙; 張明文

doi:10.6209/JORIES.202109_66(3).0003

山西大学，您好！

感谢采购，人社期刊库｜人社论文库，期间：2024/01/01~2024/12/31

感谢试用，科学期刊库｜科学论文库，期间：2024/10/20~2025/01/20

浏览高级检索

关闭
检索检索高级检索出版物检索
浏览期刊主题浏览核心期刊浏览期刊拼音浏览

关闭

查询符号(半角)	查询符号意义说明
空格	表示为「AND」两个查询词之交集
双引号 ( " " )	片语以双引号标示开始及结束，而且只寻找出现顺序相同的字词，例： " image process "
?	表示一个字母切截，输入两个?表两个字母，依此类推，例：输入「Appl?」，查得结果应为appl e , appl y … ( 常用于英文字查询 )
*	表示不限字母切截，由0~n. 例：输入「appl*」，查得结果应为appl e , appl es , appl y , appl ied , appl ication … ( 常用于英文字查询 )
AND、OR、NOT	布尔逻辑组合关键字，用来扩大或缩小查询范围的技巧。 (1) AND ：缩小查询范围 (2) OR ：扩大查询范围(3) NOT：排除不相关的范围

DOI 是数位物件识别码（ D igital O bject I dentifier ）的简称，
为物件在网路上的唯一识别码，可用于永久连结并引用目标物件。

使用DOI作为永久连结

每个DOI号前面加上「 http://dx.doi.org/ 」便成为永久网址。
如以DOI号为 10.5297/ser.1201.002 的文献为例，此文献的永久连结便是： http://dx.doi.org/ 10.5297/ser.1201.002 。
日后不论出版单位如何更动此文献位置，永久连结所指向的位置皆会即时更新，不再错失重要的研究。

引用含有DOI的文献

有DOI的文献在引用时皆应同时引用DOI。若使用APA、Chicago以外未规范DOI的引用格式，可引用DOI永久连结。

DOI可强化引用精确性、增强学术圈连结，并给予使用者跨平台的良好使用经验，目前在全世界已有超过五千万个对象申请DOI。如想对DOI的使用与概念有进一步了解，请参考（）。

ACI:

数据来源：Academic Citation Index，简称ACI

台湾最大的引用文献资料库，目前收录台湾与港澳地区所出版的人文学、社会学领域学术期刊之书目资料与参考文献，总期刊量超过690种，每年定期公布收录期刊的影响指数(Impact Factor)等指标给大众，并提供专家学者与学术单位实用的计量与分析功能。

五年影响指数（5-Year Impact Factor）：某一期刊前五年所出版的文章在当年度的平均被引用次数。

公式：（前五年发表论文在统计年的被引用次数）÷（前五年论文产出论文总篇数）

例如：A期刊2017年之五年影响指数

(A期刊2012-2016年发表论文在2017年的被引总次数)/(A期刊2012-2016年发表的论文总数)

什么是预刊文章？

为提供读者最前线之学术资讯，于期刊文献获同意刊登后、纸本印制完成前，率先于网路线上发表之文章即为预刊文章。预刊文章尚未有卷期、页次及出版日期资讯，但可藉由DOI号识别。 DOI号是文献的数位身份证字号，不论预刊或正式出版皆不会改变，读者可点击DOI连结，或于DOI号前面加上「 http://dx.doi.org/ 」连结到文献目前最新版本。

如何引用预刊文章？

请使用预刊文章的线上发表日期及DOI号来引用该篇文献。

引用范例(视不同引文格式规范可能有所差异)：

作者姓名。文章篇名。期刊名称。 YYYY/MM/DD线上预先发表。

doi:DOI 号

来源数据

P61 - 105

社会科学 > 教育学

DOI： 10.6209/JORIES

书目管理工具

相关连结

问题回报

全文下载

应用Petri-Net建构知识构图强化适性学习诊断与学习推荐之研究

Applying Petri-Net to Construct Knowledge Graphs for Adaptive Learning Diagnostics and Learning Recommendations

戴建耘(Jiann-Yun Dai) ；叶国良(Kuo-Liang Yeh) ；高曼婷(Man-Ting Kao) ；袁宇熙(Yu-Hsi Yuan) ；张明文(Min-Wen Chang)

教育科学研究期刊； 66 卷 3 期 (2021 / 09 / 01) ， P61 - 105

繁体中文 DOI： 10.6209/JORIES.202109_66(3).0003

0 个人觉得这篇文章赞

摘要 │ 参考文献 (99) │ 被引用文献 (1) │ 国际计量

摘要〈TOP〉

并列摘要〈TOP〉

Because of the increasing heterogeneity among students in classes and schools, determining a student's basic learning status and ability in each subject and tailoring instruction or adapting remedial teaching to a student's needs and characteristics have become challenging, especially for those students with learning disadvantages. According to Skinner's behavioral learning theory (as cited in Gregory, 1987), differences in a student's learning experiences (such as in understanding concepts) lead to considerable disparities in future learning. Drastic differences in internal cognition and concept structure may exist even among students with the same traditional learning achievements (i.e., scores) (Yu & Yu, 2006). Furthermore, the differences in concept cognition structure between experts and novices may be discoverable by analyzing similarities in students' conceptual understandings, relationships, or psychological metrics (Brand-Gruwel et al., 2005; Hsu et al., 2012). Cognitive diagnostic models, such as the knowledge map, are useful for assessing a student's conceptual knowledge structures and misconceptions to improve differentiated teaching, learning diagnosis, and remedial teaching (Chu et al., 2014; Hwang, Shi et al., 2011; Hwang, Wu et al., 2011; Ku et al., 2014; Lou et al., 2007; Lwo et al., 2013; Ting & Kuo, 2016). However, most such models have been constructed using only vertical hierarchical structures, wherein spotting multilateral correlations or influences between subjects or concepts proves difficult. Unlike an expert, a student cannot intuitively identify the multilateral correlations between the concepts involved a learning pathway, and analyzing novice learning is challenging and requires considerable time and effort. An adaptive mechanism for diagnosing and analyzing students' dynamic learning behaviors and learning pathways could improve autonomous learning and remedial teaching. However, most existing mechanisms cannot offer adaptive or personalized learning content or pathways to the learner (Singhal, 2012; Ting & Kuo, 2016; Wang et al., 2019). With the advantages provided by information technologies such as big data analytics and artificial intelligence, large-scale heterogeneous data analysis, cloud computing, and Knowledge Graphs (KGs) with directionally linked data structures have been widely applied in recommendation systems to facilitate the representation of knowledge structures and to mine for new knowledge that helps to meets users' needs (Deng et al., 2019; Fensel et al., 2020; Guan et al., 2019; Jia et al., 2018; Nickel et al., 2016; Noy et al., 2019; Yu et al., 2020). Similar to tree-structured knowledge maps, KGs are based on directional or nondirectional ontological graphs composed of concept nodes and relationship edges and employ the consensus opinions of Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) to generate consolidated KGs or generate KGs automatically from large mined data sets or text. The associated reasoning mechanism is used to make inferences based on the existing concepts and relationships among them. Among all the graph-building options, Petri-Net possess the most robust capabilities for graphical workflow presentation and pathway analysis (Peterson, 1981; Tan & Zhou, 2013). They have long been widely applied in adaptive learning and learning pathway recommendation. According to information published by the Taiwan Bureau of Foreign Trade and Taiwan Electrical and Electronic Manufacturers' Association in 2020, the electrical and electronics industry accounted for 50.59% of Taiwan's total export value in 2019. The foundational electricity course is an important core course for future electrical and Electronic Engineering (EE) study and can be the first obstacle for novices because of the intricate relationships among its knowledge concepts. Also, significant differences may exist in individual understandings of concept structures (Dai, 2015). To address the aforementioned challenges in learning diagnostics and remedial teaching, this study was based on learning theories such as the conditions of learning, constructivism, and scaffolding theory and utilized Petri-Net to achieve the following goals: 1. Use a Petri-Net to construct a KG visualizing a foundational electricity course. 2. Conduct a pilot study to identify personal learning pathways, interrelationships among foundational electricity concepts, and misconceptions regarding novices' learning types. 3. Use students' learning history to predict their learning effectiveness when studying future concepts and maximize their learning outcomes. 4. Recommend an adaptive, calibrated, personalized learning pathway for further remedial teaching and learning. In this study, we employed a three-round modified Delphi technique with 18 SMEs to identify 12 subjects, 58 concepts, and 95 corresponding interrelationships within a core foundational electricity course in EE. We utilized a Petri-Net with graphic features to construct a KG we called a Petri-Net KG. After the third round of the modified Delphi technique, all eight SMEs' Content Validity Indexes (CVI) were 1.00. Cronbach'sαwas .75. The SMEs' opinions regarding the interrelationships of concepts exhibited good internal consistency and reliability, according to 95% confidence intervals. The correlations between concept weights were .83-.96 (p ＜ .01). Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICCs) were used to confirm the consistency of SMEs' opinions on the weights of the interrelationships between concepts. ICC (1) was .072, and ICC (2) was .75. All the SMEs' opinions exhibited significant and strong correlations and good consistency. Using 947 students' assessment records, learning portfolios, and learning status data (e.g. conditions of learning performance, scores), the reasoning engine was used to employ the KGs for learning transfer analysis. Preliminary exploration case studies were conducted to create Petri-Net KGs personalized for students with three different learning types (insufficiently hardworking, inadequate learning, and abnormal learning) and to determine their learning progress and status. Sato's student-problem chart was used to classify students' learning types. The major results and findings of this study are as follows: 1. The most important concept was circuit patterns and characteristics, affecting the learning of the subsequent 12 concepts, and the total impact was 6. Units, vector operations, and voltage-in that order-were the next most important concepts. 2. The proposed Petri-Net KG provided students with visualized learning scaffoldings that indicate the experts' consensus cognitive structure. It also clarified any prior concepts requisite for understanding each concept. 3. By utilizing the weights of the interrelationships between concepts and their prior concepts, the reasoning engine could adaptively diagnose misconceptions and further predict students' effectiveness in learning subsequent concepts. 4. Each learning type was associated with a unique cognitive structure. Integrating students' learning portfolio data into the proposed Petri-Net KG enabled the reasoning engine to recommend an adaptive and personalized learning pathway. The aforementioned results have the following implications for future applications and research: 1. The visualized Petri-Net KG for the foundational electricity course could clearly depict learning types, experts' consensus knowledge structure, and students' personal cognitive structures. Additionally, most influential concepts were observable at a glance. Such KGs could be useful for guiding concept recognition and effectively diagnosing misconceptions. 2. The personalized learning pathways and content recommended by the Petri-Net KG and reasoning engine can be used in a self-tutoring platform. The weighted concept intercorrelations and student learning data can be analyzed to determine students' cognitive conditions according to an expert KG. Thus, a model or student learning effectiveness can be established to strengthen the effectiveness of autonomous learning or remedial teaching. The framework of this course-level Petri-Net KG can be extended and applied to other curricula, disciplines, or educational levels to develop appropriate recommendation systems for competency development.

参考文献 ( 99 ) 〈TOP〉

余民宁, M.-N.(2011).教育测验与评量—成就测验与教学评量.心理=Psychological.
连结：
林蓓伶, P.-L.,潘昌志, C.-C.,苏少祖, S.-Z.,陈柏熹, P.-H.(2018)。十二年国教国中阶段自然科学领域素养导向评量试题之开发与初探。教育科学研究期刊，63(4)，295-337。
连结：
许天维, T.-W.,蔡清斌, C.-P.,郑百成, B.-C.,曾建维, J.-W.,俞克斌, K.-P.,永井正武, M.(2013)。部分给分S-P表分析法扩张提案及其在数学测验上的应用。测验统计年刊，21(上=1)，13-40。
连结：
陈志文, C.-W.,朱蕙君, H.-C.(2015)。以流程概念构图为鹰架之学习策略建立技职院校旅运管理资讯系统之专业技能学习模式。数位学习科技期刊，7(1)，59-72。
连结：
廖梨伶, L.-L.,刘洁心, C.-H.,施淑芳, S.-F.,郑其嘉, C.-C.,张子超, T.-C.(2019)。青少年健康素养：由健康促进观点建构定义与能力指标。教育科学研究期刊，64(1)，25-51。
连结：

被引用文献 ( 1 ) 〈TOP〉

(2024)。笔记撰写结合学生出题策略对国小生社会领域笔记品质与学习成效之研究。教育科学研究期刊，69(2)，173-208。

国际计量

〈TOP〉

E-mail ：

文章公开取用时，将寄通知信至您填写的信箱地址