多元思考教學策略對國小教師數學教學之影響暨教師專業成長模式之建構

The Effects of Multiple Thinking Teaching Strategy on Elementary School Teachers' Mathematics Teaching and the Construction of a Teachers' Professional Growth Model

10.6251/BEP.20010430

張景媛(Ching-Yuan Chang)；呂玉琴(Yuh-Chyn Leu)；何缊琪(Yun-Chi Ho)；吳青蓉(Ching-Jung Wu)；林奕宏(Yi-Hong Lin)

數學 ； 多元思考教學策略 ； 教學督導 ； 教師專業成長歷程 ； Mathematics ； Multiple Thinking Teaching Strategy ； Teaching Supervision ； the Process of Teachers' Professional Growth

教育心理學報

33卷2期（2002 / 04 / 01）

1 - 22

繁體中文

本研究目的有二：（一）分析教師由督導協助進行數學科多元思考教學策略的效果。（二）探討實驗組教師的專業成長歷程。參與者含小學生74位，督導、實驗組及控制組教師各l位。工具有教案、成就測驗卷、學生手記、教師札記、課堂觀察記錄表。經一學年實驗教學發現：l.實驗組與控制組學生的五下數學成就測驗成績無顯著差異，但實驗組六下數學成就測驗成績顯著高於控制組。2.從學生手記發現實驗組學生喜愛多元思考教學策略。3.學生在小組討論時能得出課本所無的解題內容。4.教師是透過研習、討論、教學及省思等歷程提升個人專業能力。5.教師專業成長歷程包含：想像期、挫折期、習慣期、激發期、思考期、嘗試期、修正期和推廣期。

The purpose of this study was twofold:(1) to analyze the effect of teachers' multiple thinking teaching strategy under the help of supervision; and (2) to explore the process of teachers' professional growth. The participants used in this study were 74 elementary school students, one supervisor, one experimental group teacher, and one control group teacher. The instruments administered to the subjects were Teaching Program of Mathematics Multiple Thinking Teaching Strategy, Mathematics Achievement Tests, Notebook of Mathematics Learning, a Teaching Diary, and Classroom Observation Records. The findings were as follows: (1) There was a significant difference in mathematics performance between the experimental and control groups on the mathematics achievement test, with the experimental group scoring higher than that of control group. (2) According to students' notebooks, they showed that they liked the multiple thinking teaching strategy. (3) In the process of group discussion, students obtained the problem-solving methods that were not listed on the textbook. (4) Teachers should participate in study meeting, discussion, practical teachings and reflection to promote their professional abilities, and (5) The teachers' professional growth process seems to include eight stages: imagination, frustration, habit, activation, thinking, trying, modification, and promotion.

1. Checkley, K.(1997).The first seven ...and the eight: a conversation with Howard Gardner.Educational Leadership,55(1),8-13.
2. Gagne, E. D.,Yekovich, C. W.,Yekovich, F. R.(1993).The Cognitive Psychology of School Learning.New York:Haper Collins College Publishers.
3. Gardner, H.(1995).Reflections on multiple intelligences: myths and messages.Phi Delta Kappan,77(3),200-209.
4. Gardner, H.(1997).Multiple intelligences as a partner in school improvement.Educational Leadership,55(1),20-21.
5. Gardner, H.(1983).Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences.New York:Basic Books.
6. Glickman, C. D.,Gordon, S. P.,Ross-Gordon, J. M.(1995).Supervision of instruction.Boston:Allyn and Bacon.
7. Larkin, J.,McDermott, J.,Simon, D. P.,Simon, H. A.(1980).Expert and novice performance in solving physics problems.Science,208,1335-1342.
8. Mayer, R. E.(1987).Educational Psychology: A cognitive approach.Boston:Little, Brown and Company.
9. Mezirow, J.(1975).Education for perspective. Transformation: Women's reentry programs in community colleges.New York:Center for Adult Education, Teachers College, Columbia University.
10. Schoenfeld, A. H.(1985).Mathematical Problem Solving.New York, NY:Academic Press.
11. Schunk, D. H.(1989).Self-regulated learning and academic achievement : Theory, research, and practice.
12. Schunk, D. H.(1989).Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory,research, and practice.
13. Shulman, L. S.(1986).Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching.Harvard Education Review,57,1-22.
14. Vygotsky, L. S.(1978).Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
15. Vygotsky, L. S.(1978).Cambridge.
16. 吳青蓉 Wu, Ching-Jung(1996)。英語科專家/生手教師教學歷程與教學效果之比較研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所。
17. 岳修平 Yueh, Hsiu-Ping(1998)。教學心理學-學習的認知基礎。台北:遠流。
18. 柯華葳 Ko, Hwa-Wei、幸曼玲 Shing, Marn-Ling(1995)。小學日常生活之生態研究。行政院教育改革審議委員會。
19. 柯華葳、范信賢(1990)。增進國小社會科課文理解度之研究。國教學報，3
20. 張景媛 Chang, Ching-Yuan(1994)。國中生數學學習歷程統整模式的驗證與應用:學生建構數學概念的分析及數學文字題教學策略的研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育與心理輔導研究所。
21. 游麗卿(1997)。從學生和專家的認知觀點探究小學四年級學生對除法陳述性和程序性知識。行政院國家科學委員會。
22. 黃幸美 Huang, Hsing-Mei、林美珍 Lin, Mei-Jen、鄭晉昌 Jehng, Jihn-Chang(1997)。國小學童好與差解題者的類比推理解題表現之探討。教育與心理研究 Journal of Education & Psychology，20(上)，111-139。

1. 曾柏瑜、陳淑麗(2010)。大專生初任補救教學的教學困難與成長歷程之研究。教育研究集刊，56(3)，67-103。
2. 黃台珠、何仕仁(2005)。不同教學、知識創造管理模式對國中生數學學習成效之影響研究。科學教育學刊，13(2)，217-239。
3. 靳知勤、曾崇賢、段曉林(2011)。探究教學的專業成長歷程─以十位國中科學教師的觀點為例。科學教育學刊，19(2)，143-168。
4. 錢昭萍、梁麗珍(2017)。多元教學對不同學院與性別的學生學習態度與學習成效之影響—以科技大學大一國文課為例。人文社會學報，13(3)，219-249。
5. 王佳琪(2022)。探究式教學融入教育心理學課程之行動研究。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊，15(2)，1-34。
6. 蕭佳純(2015)。國小教師參與創意教學研習成效之研究。教育科學期刊，14(2)，135-157。
7. 蕭佳純(2017)。在職進修教師創意教學自我效能發展之縱貫性研究。教育科學研究期刊，62(3)，25-55。
8. 蕭佳純(2018)。參與創造力教學工作坊對教師創造力教學行為影響研究。清華教育學報，35(2)，1-33。
9. 謝中君、周治蕙、王天苗(2008)。擴權一位嚴重障礙幼兒母親的歷程和效果。特殊教育研究學刊，33(1)，21-43。
10. 楊牧貞、陳沐新、許得億、胡逸璽(2009)。潛意識思考及意識思考對困難問題決策之影響。教育心理學報，41(2)，427-440。
11. 張聖翎,林秀玲,吳相儀(2021)。突破合作學習困境：得獎教師教學策略分析之研究。教育心理學報，52(4)，807-827。