知覺教師回饋、個人成就目標、學業自我效能與無聊之關係：中介效果與條件間接化效果分析

Perceived Teacher Feedbacks, Personal Achievement Goals, and Academic Self-efficacy on Boredom: The Mediation Effect and Conditional Indirect Effect

10.6251/BEP.201909_51(1).0004

彭淑玲(Shu-Ling Peng)

知覺教師回饋 ； 個人成就目標 ； 條件間接化效果 ； 無聊 ； 學業自我效能 ； Academic self-efficacy ； Boredom ； Conditional indirect effect ； Personal achievement goals ； Perceived teacher feedbacks

教育心理學報

51卷1期（2019 / 09 / 01）

83 - 108

繁體中文

本研究依據探討學業情緒的控制－價值理論，說明情境（知覺教師回饋）與個人因素（個人成就目標、學業自我效能）如何共同對無聊產生影響。據此，本研究目的為：（1）建構「知覺教師回饋、個人成就目標與無聊之中介模式」，以瞭解個體知覺教師給予的回饋如何形塑其持有的成就目標、進而影響無聊。（2）考驗學業自我效能在上述中介模式上的調節效果。為完成上述目的，本研究以1105位七年級學生進行施測，並以數學科為主，蒐集資料以結構方程模式（structural equational modeling, SEM）進行中介效果與條件化間接效果分析。研究結果發現：（1）「自我參照回饋→趨向精熟目標→無聊」與「常模參照回饋→逃避表現目標→無聊」兩個中介模式受到觀察資料支持，可解釋當學生知覺不同教師回饋類型時，會形塑不同個人成就目標以對無聊產生間接效果。（2）學業自我效能會調節「自我參照回饋→趨向精熟目標→無聊」之負向間接效果：當學生持有的學業自我效能程度逐漸提升時，自我參照回饋透過趨向精熟目標對無聊的抑制效果會隨之增強。本研究依據研究結果提出建議，以作為國中教學輔導與未來研究之參考。

The study, grounded on the control-value theory of academic emotion, examined how the contextual factors (i.e., the perceived teacher feedbacks) and personal (i.e., the personal achievement goals and academic self-efficacy) factor have impact on boredom. Accordingly, the objectives of the present study are twofold: firstly, to construct four mediation models for investigating the relationship among the perceived teacher feedbacks, personal achievement goals, and boredom (i.e., ＂the perceived self-reference feedbacks → mastery-approach goal → boredom＂, ＂the perceived self-reference feedbacks → mastery-avoidance goal → boredom＂, ＂the perceived normative-reference feedbacks → performance-approach goal → boredom＂, and ＂the perceived normative-reference feedbacks → performance-avoidance goal → boredom＂); secondly, to test whether the above mediation relations can be moderated by the academic self-efficacy. Methodologically, a math survey was conducted with 1105 participants of 7th grade students in Taiwan, and the researcher analyzed the collected data using the technique of structural equation modeling (SEM) to test both the mediation effect and conditional indirect effect. The results showed that the two mediation models of ＂the perceived self-reference feedback → mastery-approach goal → boredom＂ and ＂the perceived normative-reference feedback → performance-avoidance goal → boredom＂ were supported by the observed data, which adequately captures the relationship among the perceived teacher feedbacks, personal achievement goals, and boredom. Specifically, mastery-approach goal fully mediates the prediction of the perceived self-reference feedback on boredom, and performance-avoidance goal fully mediates the prediction of the perceived normative-reference feedback on boredom. Also, it was found that the academic self-efficacy well moderates the negative indirect effect of ＂the perceived self-reference feedback → mastery-approach goal → boredom.＂ In other words, when the level of individual’s academic self-efficacy is gradually increasing, the inhibition effect that the perceived self-reference feedbacks with individuals' adoption of mastery-approach goals pose on boredom increases. Based on the findings, relevant recommendations were proposed for further research, teaching practices, and junior high school counseling.

1. 林宴瑛, Y. Y.,程炳林, B. L.(2012)。環境目標結構與控制－價值信念對學業情緒之效果。教育心理學報，44(1)，49-72。
   連結：
2. 彭淑玲, S. L.(2017)。未來取向之自我調整學習模式暨檢驗課室目標結構的調節效果。教育心理學報，48(3)，371-397。
   連結：
3. 程炳林, B. L.(2003)。四向度目標導向模式之研究。師大學報，48(1)，15-40。
   連結：
4. Ames, C.(1992).Classrooms: Goals, structures and student motivation.Journal of Educational Psychology,84(3),261-271.
5. Ames, C.,Archer, J.(1988).Achievement goals in the classroom: Student's learning strategies and motivation process.Journal of Educational Psychology,80(3),260-267.
6. Bandura, A.(1997).Self-efficacy: The exercise of control.NY:Freeman.
7. Baron, R. M.,Kenny, D. A.(1986).The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,51(6),1173-1182.
8. Boehme, K. L.,Goetz, T.,Preckel, F.(2017).Is it good to value math? Investigating mother's impact on their children's test anxiety based on control-value theory.Contemporary Educational Psychology,51,11-21.
9. Boekaerts, M.(Ed.),Pintrich, P. R.(Ed.)(2000).Handbook of self-regulation.San Diego, CA:Academic Press.
10. Braten, I.,Samuelstuen, M. S.,Strømsø, H. I.(2004).Do students’ self-efficacy beliefs moderate the effects of performance goals on self-regulatory strategy use?.Educational Psychology,24(2),231-247.
11. Butler, R.(2006).Are mastery and ability goals both adaptive? Evaluation, initial goal construction and the quality of task engagement.British Journal of Educational Psychology,76,595-611.
12. Butler, R.(1987).Task-involving and ego-involving properties of evaluation: Effects of different feedback conditions on motivational perceptions, interest, and performance.Journal of Educational Psychology,79(4),474-482.
13. Chen, F. F.(2007).Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance.Structural equation modeling,14(3),464-504.
14. Cohen, J.(1988).Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences.Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15. Elliot, A. J.,McGregor, H. A.(2001).A 2 × 2 achievement goal framework.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,80(3),501-519.
16. Elliott, E. S.,Dweck, C. S.(1988).Goals: An approach to motivation and achievement.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,54(1),5-12.
17. Finn, K. V.,Frone, M. R.(2004).Academic performance and cheating: Moderating role of school identification and self-efficacy.The Journal of Educational Research,97(3),115-121.
18. Fisher, C. D.(1993).Boredom at work: A neglected concept.Human, Relations,46(3),395-417.
19. Fu, A. T.,Ko, H. C.,Wu, J. Y. W.,Cherng, B. L.,Cheng, C. P.(2007).Impulsivity and expectancy in risk for alcohol use: Comparing male and female college students in Taiwan.Addictive Behaviors,32(9),1887-1896.
20. Gladstone, J. R.,Häfner, I.,Turci, L.,Kneiβler, H.,Muenks, K.(2018).Associations between parents and students’ motivational beliefs in mathematics and mathematical performance: The role of gender.Contemporary Educational Psychology,54,221-234.
21. Goetz, T.,Cronjaeger, H.,Frenzel, A. C.,Lüdtke, O.,Hall, N. C.(2010).Academic self-concept and emotion relations: Domain specificity and age effects.Contemporary Educational Psychology,35,44-58.
22. Goetz, T.,Hall, N. C.(2014).Academic boredom.International handbook of emotions in education,New York:
23. Goetz, T.,Pekrun, R.,Hall, N.,Haag, L.(2006).Academic emotions from a social-cognitive perspective: Antecedents and domain specificity of students’ affect in the context of Latin instruction.Journal of Educational Psychology,76(2),289-308.
24. Goetz, T.,Sticca, F.,Pekrun, R.,Murayama, K.,Elliot, A.(2016).Intraindividual relations between achievement goals and discrete achievement emotions: An experience sampling approach.Learning and Instruction,41,115-125.
25. Hall, N. C.,Sampasivam, L.,Muis, K. R.,Ranellucci, J.(2016).Achievement goals and emotions: The mediational roles of perceived progress, control, and value.British Journal of Educational Psychology,86,313-330.
26. Hattie, J.,Timperley, H.(2007).The power of feedback.Review of Educational Research,77(1),81-112.
27. Huang, C.(2011).Achievement goals and achievement emotions: A meta-analysis.Educational Psychology Review,23,359-388.
28. Huang, C. J.(2012).Discriminant and criterion-related validity of achievement goals in predicting academic achievement: A meta-analysis.Journal of Educational Psychology,104(1),48-73.
29. Jang, L. Y.,Liu, W. C.(2012).2 × 2 achievement goals and achievement emotions: a cluster analysis of students’ motivation.European Journal of Psychology of Education,27(1),59-76.
30. Jöreskog, K. G.,Sörbom, D.(2001).Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (2001). LISREL (Version 8.51) [Computer software]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International..
31. Larson, R. W.,Richards, M. H.(1991).Boredom in the middle school years: Blaming schools versus blaming students.American Journal of Education,99,418-433.
32. Macklem, G. L.(2015).Boredom in the classroom: Addressing student motivation, self-fegulation, and engagement in learning.Manchester, MA:Springer.
33. Mrudock, T. B.,Anderman, E. M.(2006).Motivational perspectives on student cheating: Toward an integrated model of academic dishonesty.Educational Psychologist,41(3),129-145.
34. Nett, U. E.,Goetz, T.,Hall, N. C.(2011).Coping with boredom in school: An experience sampling perspective.Contemporary Educational Psychology,36(1),49-59.
35. Pekrun, R.(2006).The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice.Educational Psychology Review,18,315-341.
36. Pekrun, R.,Cusack, A.,Murayama, K.,Elliot, A. J.,Thomas, K.(2014).The power of anticipated feedback: Effects on students’ achievement goals and achievement emotions.Learning and Instruction,29,115-124.
37. Pekrun, R.,Elliot, A. J.,Maier, M. A.(2006).Achievement goals and discrete achievement emotions: A theoretical model and prospective test.Journal of Educational Psychology,98,583-597.
38. Pekrun, R.,Elliot, A. J.,Maier, M. A.(2009).Achievement goals and achievement emotions: Testing a model of their joint relations with academic performance.Journal of Educational Psychology,101(1),115-135.
39. Pekrun, R.,Goetz, T.,Daniels, L. M.,Stupnisky, R. H.,Perry, R. P.(2010).Boredom in achievement settings: Exploring control-value antecedents and performance outcomes of a neglected emotion.Journal of Educational Psychology,102(3),531-549.
40. Pekrun, R.,Goetz, T.,Titz, W.,Perry, R. P.(2002).Academic emotions in students’ self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research.Educational Psychologist,37(2),91-105.
41. Pekrun, R.,Hall, N. C.,Goetz, T.,Perry, R. P.(2014).Boredom and academic achievement: Testing a model of reciprocal causation.Journal of Educational Psychology,106(3),696-710.
42. Pekrun, R.,Perry, R. P.(2014).Control-value theory of achievement emotions.International handbook of emotions in education,New York:
43. Perry, R. P.,Hladkyj, S.,Pekrun, R. H.,Pelletier, S. T.(2001).Academic control and action control in the achievement of college students: A longitudinal field study.Journal of Educational Psychology,93(4),776-789.
44. Preacher, K. J.,Rucker, D. D.,Hayes, A. F.(2007).Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions.Multivariate Behavioral Research,42(1),185-227.
45. Putwain, D. W.,Larkin, D.,Sander, P.(2013).A reciprocal model of achievement goals and learning related emotions in the first year of undergraduate study.Contemporary Educational Psychology,38,361-374.
46. Rubio, D. M.,Berg-Weger, M.,Tebb, S. S.(2001).Using structural equation modeling to test for multidimensionality.Structural Equation Modeling,8(4),613-626.
47. Senko, C.,Harackiewicz, J.(2005).Regulation of achievement goals: the role competence feedback.Journal of Educational Psychology,97(3),320-336.
48. Simmons, A. L.,Ren, R.(2009).The influence of goal orientation and risk on creativity.Creativity Research Journal,21(4),400-408.
49. Tze, V. M. C.,Klassen, R. M.,Daniels, L. M.(2014).Patterns of boredom and its relationship with perceived autonomy support and engagement.Contemporary Educational Psychology,39(3),175-187.
50. Weidinger, A. F.,Spinath, B.,Steinmayr, R.(2016).Why does intrinsic motivation decline following negative feedback? The mediating role of ability self-concept and its moderation by goal orientations.Learning and Individual Differences,47,117-128.
51. You, J. W.,Kang, M.(2014).The role of academic emotions in the relationship between perceived academic control and self-regulated learning in online learning.Computers & Education,77,125-133.
52. 朱展志, J. J.,林如瀚, J. H.(2011)。不同參照回饋對低體適能學童成就動機與體適能成績之影響。教育與多元文化研究，5，119-137。
53. 吳靜吉, J. J.,程炳林, B. L(1992)。激勵的學習策略量表之修訂。測驗年刊，39，59-78。
54. 李俊青, C. C.,程炳林, B. L.(2006)。學業情緒之控制－價值與認知－動機中介模式之分析。台灣心理學會第 45 屆年會，台北=Taipei, Taiwan:
55. 陳正昌, C. C.,程炳林, B. L.(2002).SPSS、SAS、BMDP 統計軟體在多變量統計上的應用.台北=Taipei:五南=Wunan.
56. 彭淑玲, S. L.,黃博聖, P. S.,陳學志, H. C.。學習情境中的個人成就目標與作弊接受度之關係：以學業自我效能為調節變項。教育科學期刊
57. 程炳林, B. L.(2012)。科技部專案研究報告科技部專案研究報告,科技部。

1. 程炳林,彭淑玲(2020)。學生為何作弊？以條件化間接效果考驗課室目標結構、個人成就目標、無聊與作弊之關係。教育心理學報，51(3)，387-413。
2. 黃博聖,彭淑玲,陳學志(2019)。學習情境中的個人成就目標與作弊接受度之關係：以學業自我效能為調節變項。教育科學研究期刊，64(4)，87-113。
3. 賴英娟,巫博瀚(2022)。國中生所知覺到的教師自主支持、自我效能、任務價值對學習投入之影響。教育心理學報，53(3)，543-564。
4. 李逢堅(2022)。不進而廢：高關懷國中生學校學習問題之研究。中華輔導與諮商學報，63，35-70。
5. 劉思彣(2021)。臺灣近20年特殊性自我效能分類架構與趨勢研究。科技與人力教育季刊，7(4)，90-108。
6. 彭淑玲(2021)。不同回饋操弄對臺灣國中生期望－價值信念與學習表現之影響。教育心理學報，53(2)，383-405。
7. 蘇泓誠(2022)。臺灣學生競爭意識與害怕失敗對數學素養關聯之探討：以PISA 2018資料為例。教育學誌，47，47-64。
8. 徐名敬(2022)。國軍軍官階級晉升停滯與生活滿意之關聯探討：以工作滿意為中介變項。管理資訊計算，11(2)，236-245。
9. 葉建宏,陳美蓮,陳柏熹,洪榮昭(2020)。青少年創意自我效能、競賽投入與參加競賽的價值之關係－以IEYI世界青少年創客發明展選拔賽為例。教育心理學報，51(3)，457-481。
10. 葉宗一,王淑卿,王國華(2020)。合作問題解決自我效能量表發展與科學學習成就關係之探討。科學教育學刊，28(4)，353-377。