運用MSE模式於國中數學補救教學之合作式行動研究

Applying Collaborative Action Research through MSE Infused Curriculum on Mathematics Remedial Teaching in Middle School Classroom

10.6251/BEP.202112_53(2).0007

劉玉玲(Yu-Ling Liu)

數學學習策略 ； 數學學業情緒 ； 中介作用 ； 補救教學 ； Vico理念 ； mathematics learning strategies ； mathematics learning emotions ； mediating effects ； remedial teaching ； Vico's ideals

教育心理學報

53卷2期（2021 / 12 / 01）

407 - 435

繁體中文

本研究欲以Vico理念（1990, 1999）改善傳統教學信念，並作為本研究的核心價值以引導教學。數學課程實施的場域是在原班級的正課中，進行不同程度學生的差異化與補救教學。其次，本研究將過去所建構的MSE教學模式融入至數學課中以了解可行性。據此，研究目的有二：（1）瞭解Vico理念是否能促進數學教師在教學轉化歷程中的專業成長；（2）釐清Vico理念在MSE融入式教學中，是否能改善學生的數學學習。為達上述目的，本研究採用合作式行動研究主要以質性研究中的參與觀察法、半結構訪談與文件分析法，輔以問卷調查法。研究結果顯示：（1）教師在教學轉化能力、融入式教學與補救教學的專業成長；（2）教師面對MSE融入式教學方案的困難時，Vico理念促進教師的教學投入，協助改善學生運用數學學習策略的能力，並提升覺察與調適數學學業情緒的知能。研究之建議可供數學教學或教育心理研究者、國中數學或學習扶助教師的參考。

The Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) and the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMMS) results have revealed that students' mathematics performance in Taiwan indicated a lack of student interest and a lack of student confidence and that students in Taiwan did not view skills in mathematics as valuable. Although high performance was noted in a substantial minority of the lowest performing students, the government launched many programs out of concern for disadvantaged and underperforming students, and these programs have been implemented for many years. After several years of efforts to conduct supplemental instruction for low-achieving students in mathematics (without satisfactory results), a new approach has emerged and is the fundamental theme of the present study, namely that teachers' own beliefs about teaching are an important factor that influences the effectiveness of student learning. Empirical research has indicated that those teachers who contribute to effective student learning share similar teaching beliefs. Their teaching beliefs influence the relationship between learning techniques and culture and help students build on prior learning. Additionally, such teachers devise and present curricula that are relevant to students and that are aligned with their learning needs and cultures. The aim of this study is twofold. First, although teaching beliefs have been studied in detail in many contexts, this is the first study of aesthetic knowledge in remedial mathematics teaching. This study provides a crucial practical basis for remedial mathematics teaching in middle school classrooms. Second, the findings of this study should motivate future research in this area by providing a basis for action research. The paper is structured as follows. First, we briefly define Vico's ideals and methods for transferring those ideals into the regular classroom. Second, our conceptual framework highlights how mathematics learning strategies and mathematics learning emotions influence motivational processes within student learning. Third, we present our conclusions resulting from this framework. Questions and implications for future research arising from the analyses then follow. Finally, we discuss how teachers can apply Vico's ideals and MSE to actual classroom teaching. A central issue in this study is how teachers apply Vico's ideals and MSE to actual classroom teaching. Providing teachers an opportunity to learn how to teach mathematics while engaging in authentic learning activities which combine both key mathematical and pedagogical concepts is one way to determine how teachers apply those concepts to their own teaching. According to recent studies, The New Science is the major work of Italian philosopher Giambattista Vico (1990), who posited that science without aesthetic knowledge results in a world devoid of imagination and creativity. Vico reasoned that without ontological knowledge of reality, the exact science of mathematics has limited insight into the creation of the objects in the world. Based this theory, we applied Vico's ideals (1990) as key mathematics teaching concepts to guide the core values underlying the teaching of mathematics. Vico's ideals contain three layers of aesthetic imagery: (1) the development of being to know the self and understand others, (2) the development of superior technical capabilities, and (3) the development of aesthetic performance skills. Vico's ideals provide a path to transform teaching from the ideal to the realities of the regular classroom through the three S's: the spiritual, the scientific, and storytelling; these are all conceptual teaching strategies that can support teachers and ensure effective learning for students. From 2013 to 2016, our research team constructed an MSE teaching module for supporting low-achieving students who were learning mathematics with the aid of a mathematics learning strategy (MS). Additionally, the module was designed to improve negative mathematics learning emotions and promote positive mathematics learning emotions (MEs). The question of how researchers and teachers can develop interventions in the mathematics classroom to address the learning needs of students . To achieve these purposes, we conducted collaborative action research focused on qualitative research methods and supplemented by quantitative research methods. To summarize, we focused on two classes and Vico's ideals were applied to the optimization of one class, and MSE was applied to the optimization of the other class. Empirical research material was collected by combining different methods such as questionnaires, recorded interviews, video recordings of lessons in mathematics, and classroom observations. We used the Learning Strategy Scale and the Academic Emotion Scale for before and after testing. Qualitative data collection and analysis. The optimization process through Vico's ideals was accomplished through the three S's, comprising the spiritual, the scientific, and storytelling. First, a spiritual teaching task provided the opportunity for greater self-awareness through reflection and critical questioning in collaboration with research group members and the observing teacher. In addition, teaching-by-doing and learning-by-doing activities clarified that changes in teachers' beliefs precede changes in their teaching practices. Second, in the scientific teaching task, the teacher changed the usual textbooks and paper-based evaluations to employ (1) group cooperation with tabletop games (Pagamo) and line and peer teaching to increase communicative opportunities for mathematics learning, (2) evaluation combined online platforms and multiple evaluation methodologies to cater to students with different learning needs. Third, the storytelling task used (1) digital technology to select the plot of a story, create a context, and provide examples of solving problems with mathematics and (2) anime cartoons from YouTube and story solitaire and test questions to increase student opportunities for using their mathematics knowledge. In the optimization process for the model of math self-concept, math learning strategies and math academic emotion (MSE), MSE's infused teaching and teaching images guided teachers in the teaching of mathematics emotions by careful consideration of his or her own emotions before and after class. Students are highly impressionable and are seeking out role models whose actions they will adopt and mirror. Teachers should therefore attempt to lead by example and inspire students to perform at their best. In the MSE optimization class, students drew or wrote emotions notes to increase their awareness of their mathematics learning emotions and then shared these with others. The results revealed that, first, this program provided teachers with a variety of learning experiences and with an opportunity to reconsider the underlying assumptions of their approaches to teaching and may serve as a foundation to strengthen and facilitate communication between teachers and students. Awareness and reflection of issues that affected learning and professional development also increased. Second, the MSE program not only enhanced students' mathematics learning strategies and awareness of mathematics emotions but also improved the personal growth of teachers. Third, collaborative action research helped teachers interpret the process of teacher inquiry and teaching optimization from Vico's ideals and MSE teaching models and to implement and experience an optimized curriculum. Through Vico's ideals and the 3 S's, practical strategies were provided in different teaching contexts, offering teachers and students different learning experiences and allowing them to engage their imaginations and express their creativity. The research recommendations can be used for reference by mathematics teaching or educational psychology researchers and middle school remedial mathematics teachers.

1. 江民瑜, M.-Y.(2013)。學業情緒為中介的自我調整學習模式之檢驗：以數學領域為例。當代教育研究，21(3)，113-150。
   連結：
2. 余民寧, M.-N.,李昭鋆, C.-Y.(2018)。補救教學中個別化教學對學生學習成效之影響分析。教育科學研究期刊，63(1)，247-271。
   連結：
3. 吳明隆, M.-L.,陳火城, H.-C.(2007)。高雄市國小教師數學教學信念與自我知覺教學效能關係之研究。學校行政，48，113-132。
   連結：
4. 吳明隆, M.-L.,葛建志, J. H.(2006)。國民小學學生數學歸因信念、數學態度、數學焦慮與數學成就之相關研究。高雄師大學報，21，1-18。
   連結：
5. 吳靖國, C.-K.(2005)。G. Vico 與 H.-G. Gadamer 的「共通感」在課室中的蘊義。教育研究集刊，51(4)，117-149。
   連結：
6. 吳靖國, C.-K.(2009)。「詩」對教學藝術的啟示：G. Vico 的觀點。當代教育研究季刊，17(4)，27-60。
   連結：
7. 宋佩芬, P.-F.(2016)。扶助弱勢學生學習：教師教學信念與教學取向之探究。嘉大教育研究學刊，37，149-180。
   連結：
8. 李孟峰, M.-F.,連廷嘉, T.-C.(2010)。攜手計畫—課後扶助方案：實施歷程與成效之研究。教育實踐與研究，23(1)，115-143。
   連結：
9. 林宴瑛,Y.-Y.,程炳林, B.-L.(2012)。環境目標結構與控制—價值信念對學業情緒之效果。教育心理學報，44(1)，49-72。
   連結：
10. 徐偉民, W.-M.,劉曼麗, M.-L.(2015)。國小攜手計畫數學補救教學課程決定與教學實施之探究。當代教育研究季刊，23(1)，113-147。
    連結：
11. 徐敏雄, M.-H.(2008)。融入式課程設計的操作策略—以社區大學為例。當代教育研究季刊，16(3)，59-95。
    連結：
12. 許家驊, C.-H.(2008)。不同策略教學及鷹架中介設計對個體數學文字題解題學習潛能開展效益影響之動態評量研究。教育心理學報，39(4)，114-146。
    連結：
13. 許家驊, C.-H.(2011)。歷程導向設計及學習策略中介教導對個體不同層次數學解題學習潛能開展效益影響之動態評量研究。教育心理學報，43(1)，127-154。
    連結：
14. 許瑋芷, W.-C.,陳明溥, M.-P.(2010)。數學表徵及數學自我效能對國小學生樣式推理學習成效之影響宗。數位學習科技期刊，2(3)，42-60。
    連結：
15. 陳彥廷, Y.-T.,柳賢, S.(2009)。中學生對代數式中文字符號之語意理解研究：不同管道的探討。科學教育學刊，17(1)，1-25。
    連結：
16. 陳嘉成, C.-C.,陳柏霖, P.-L.,洪兆祥, C.-H.,薛人華, J.-H.(2018)。劍的雙面刃─國中數學科不同成就學生學習組型差異之分析。教育科學研究期刊，63(3)，105-130。
    連結：
17. 黃志賢, C.-H.(2006)。結合可能發展區與鷹架之教學方案於原住民高職學生數學文字符號概念改變之研究。科學教育學刊，14(4)，467-491。
    連結：
18. 楊宏珩, H.-H.,段曉林, H.-L.(2001)。合作學習—高中化學教學之行動研究。科學教育學刊，9(1)，55-77。
    連結：
19. 劉玉玲, Y.-L.(2017)。運用舞蹈治療概念提升國中生情緒知能之研究—Vico 理念的實踐。中華輔導與諮商學報，48，137-171。
    連結：
20. 劉玉玲, Y.-L.(2016)。國中生數學學業情緒及數學學習策略與數學學業成就之研究。課程與教學，19(2)，161-192。
    連結：
21. 劉玉玲, Y.-L.,沈淑芬, S.-F.(2019)。國中生數學自我概念、數學學習策略與數學學業成就之模式建構。課程與教學，22(3)，187-214。
    連結：
22. 劉玉玲, Y.-L.,沈淑芬, S.-F.(2015)。數學自我概念、數學學習策略、數學學業情緒與數學學業成就之研究─自我提升模式觀點。教育心理學報，46(4)，491-516。
    連結：
23. 劉玉玲, Y.-L.,薛岳, Y.(2013)。國中生數學學業自我概念及數學學習策與數學學業成就之研究─自我提升模式觀點。課程與教學季刊，16(1)，159-178。
    連結：
24. TomoNews 台灣（2010 年 9 月 28 日）：〈機輪卡住迫降落紐約機長救全機 2010.09.28〉﹝影片﹞。https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IfXd_FM10BI [TomoNews Taiwan. (2010, September 28). Jilun kazhu pojiangluo niuyue jizhang jiu quanji 2010.09.28 [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IfXd_FM10BI]
25. 教育部國民及學前教育署補助國民中小學弱勢學生實施要點（2020 年 1 月 22 日）修正公布。https://edu.law.moe.gov.tw/LawContent.aspx?id=FL047648 [Implementation Points Ministry of Education K-12 Education Administration Subsidies for Disadvantaged Students in National Primary and Secondary Schools. (2020, January 22). Amendment to Articles. https://edu.law.moe.gov.tw/LawContent.aspx?id=FL047648]
26. 觸電網—電影情報入口網（2016 年 1 月 6 日）：〈絕命救援〉﹝影片﹞。YouTube。https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zZjfpPcDhs0 [Chudian wang. (2016, January 6). The Finest Hours [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zZjfpPcDhs0]
27. Muse 木棉花—闔家歡（2021 年 9 月 9 日）：〈《花家の故事》004 媽媽的減肥作戰〉﹝影片﹞。YouTube。https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QANGNvJqFos [Muse family. (2021, September 9). “Huajia de gushi” 004 Mama de jianfei zuozhan [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QANGNvJqFos]
28. Aizikovitsh, E.,Amit, M.(2010).Evaluating an infusion approach to the teaching of critical thinking skills through mathematics.Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,2(2),3818-3822.
29. Boaler, J.(Ed.)(2000).Multiple Perspectives on Mathematics Teaching and Learning.Ablex Publishing.
30. Bruce, C. D.,McPherson, R.,Sabeti, F. M.,Flynn, T.(2011).Revealing significant learning moments with interactive whiteboards in mathematics.Journal of Educational Computing Research,45(4),433-454.
31. Burghardt, M. D.,Lauckhardt, J.,Kennedy, M.,Hecht, D.,McHugh, L.(2015).The effects of a mathematics infusion curriculum on middle school student mathematics achievement.School Science and Mathematics,115(5),204-215.
32. Butterworth, B.,Varma, S.,Laurillard, D.(2011).Dyscalculia: From brain to education.Science,332(6033),1049-1053.
33. Chin, C.(2006).Classroom interaction in science: Teacher questioning and feedback to students’ responses.International Journal of Science Education,28(11),1315-1346.
34. Chin, C.(1995).University of Cambridge.
35. Clarke, D.,Hollingsworth, H.(2002).Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth.Teaching and Teacher Education,18(8),947-967.
36. Collins, A.,Brown, J. S.,Newman, S. E.(1989).Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics.Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser
37. Daniels, L. M.,Perry, P. P.,Stupnisky, R. H.,Stewart, T. L.,Newall, N. E. G.,Clifton, R. A.(2014).The longitudinal effects of achievement goals and perceived control on university student achievement.European Journal of Psychology of Education,29,175-194.
38. Dewey, J. (1934). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process (Revised edn.). Heath.
39. Duncan-Howell, J.(2010).Teachers making connections: online communities as a source of professional learning.British Journal of Educational Technology,41(2),324-340.
40. Eick, C.,Dias, M.(2005).Building the authority of experience in communities of practice: The development of preservice teachers' practical knowledge through coteaching in inquiry classrooms.Science Education,89(3),470-491.
41. Feuerstein, R.,Falik, L. H.,Feuerstein, R. S.(2015).Changing minds and brains-The legacy of Reuven Feuerstein: Higher thinking and cognition through mediated learning.Teachers College Press.
42. Feuerstein, R.,Rand, Y. A.,Hoffman, M. B.(1979).The dynamic assessment of retarded performers: The learning potential assessment device, theory, instruments, and techniques.Scott Foresman.
43. Flint, A. S.,Zisook, K.,Fisher, T. R.(2011).Not a one-shot deal: Generative professional development among experienced teachers.Teaching and Teacher Education,27(8),1163-1169.
44. Fuchs, L. S.,Powell, S. R.,Seethaler, P. M.,Fuchs, D.,Hamlett, C. L.,Cirino, P. T.,Flecher, J. M.(2010).A framework for remediating number combination deficits.Exceptional Children,76(2),135-156.
45. Furner, J. M.,Yahya, N.,Duffy, M. L.(2005).Teach mathematics: Strategies to reach all students.Intervention in School and Clinic,41(1),16-23.
46. Geary, D. C.(2013).Early foundations for mathematics learning and their relations to learning disabilities.Current Directions in Psychological Science,22(1),23-27.
47. Goetz, T.,Frenzel, A. C.,Pekrun, R.,Hall, N. C.,Lüdtke, O.(2007).Between-and within-domain relations of students' academic emotions.Journal of Educational Psychology,99(4),715-733.
48. Griffin, L. L.(Ed.),Butler, J. I.(Ed.)(2005).Teaching games for understanding: Theory, research and practice.Human Kinetics.
49. Gutstein, E.(2003).Teaching and learning mathematics for social justice in an urban Latino school.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,34(1),37-73.
50. Handelsman, M. M.,Briggs, W. L.,Sullivan, N.,Towler, A.(2005).A measure of college student course engagement.The Journal of Educational Research,98(3),184-192.
51. Hougham, P.(1992).,未出版
52. Krapp, A.(2005).Basic needs and the development of interest intrinsic motivational orientations.Learning and Instruction,15,381-395.
53. Marsh, H. W.(Ed.),Craven, R. G.(Ed.),McInerney, D. M.(Ed.)(2006).New frontiers for self research.Information Age Publishing.
54. McKernan, J.(2013).Curriculum action research: A handbook of methods and resources for the reflective practitioner.Routledge.
55. Meinhardt, J.,Pekrun, R.(2003).Attentional resource allocation to emotional events: An ERP study.Cognition and Emotion,17(3),477-500.
56. Nelson, J. R.,Roberts, M. L.(2000).Ongoing reciprocal teacher-student interactions involving disruptive behaviors in general education classrooms.Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders,8(1),27-37.
57. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development(2015).Universal basic skills: What countries stand to gain.
58. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development(2019).PISA 2018 assessment and analytical framework.
59. Parrish, P. E.(2009).Aesthetic principles for instructional design.Educational Technology Research and Development,57(4),511-528.
60. Parrish, P. E.(2005).Embracing the aesthetics of instructional design.Educational Technology,45(2),16-25.
61. Pekrun, R.(2000).A social-cognitive, control-value theory of achievement emotions.Advances in psychology, 131. Motivational psychology of human development: Developing motivation and motivating development
62. Pekrun, R.,Elliot, A. J.,Maier, M. A.(2009).Achievement goals and achievement emotions: Testing a model of their joint relations with academic performance.Journal of Educational Psychology,101(1),115-135.
63. Pekrun, R.,Goetz, T.,Titz, W.,Perry, R. P.(2002).Academic emotions in students' self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research.Educational Psychologist,37(2),91-105.
64. Perše, T. V.,Kozina, A.,Leban, T. R.(2011).Negative school factors and their influence on math and science achievement in TIMSS 2003.Educational Studies,37(3),265-276.
65. Pinar, W. F.,Reynolds, W. M.,Slattery, P.,Taubman, P. M.(1995).Understanding curriculum: An introduction to the study of historical and contemporary curriculum discourses.Peter Lang.
66. Prenzel, M.(2007).Studies on the educational quality of schools.Waxmann.
67. Puntambekar, S.,Kolodner, J. L.(2005).Toward implementing distributed scaffolding: Helping students learn science from design.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,42(2),185-217.
68. Richland, L. E.,Zur, O.,Holyoak, K. J.(2007).Cognitive supports for analogies in the mathematics classroom.Science,316(5828),1128-1129.
69. Sälzer, C.,Prenzel, M.(2014).Looking back at five rounds of PISA: Impacts on teaching and learning in Germany.Šolsko Polje,25(5/6),53-72.
70. Simsek, A.,Sales, G. C.(1993).The effects of instructional control on achievement, confidence, and attitudes in computer-based cooperative and individual learning.Journal of Computer-Based Instruction,20(3),81-86.
71. Skemp, R. R.(1989).Structured activities for primary mathematics: How to enjoy real mathematics.Taylor & Francis.
72. Skilling, K.,Bobis, J.,Martin, A. J.,Anderson, J.,Way, J.(2016).What secondary teachers think and do about student engagement in mathematics.Mathematics Education Research Journal,28(4),545-566.
73. Stacey, K.(Ed.),Turner, R.(Ed.)(2015).Assessing mathematical literacy.Springer Publishing Company.
74. Tabak, I.(2005).Synergy: A complement to emerging patterns of distributed scaffolding.Journal of the Learning Sciences,13(3),305-335.
75. Tomlinson, C. A.,Brighton, C.,Hertberg, H.,Callahan, C. M.,Moon, T. R.,Brimijoin, K.,Reynolds, T.(2003).Differentiating instruction in response to student readiness, interest, and learning profile in academically diverse classrooms: A review of literature.Journal for the Education of the Gifted,27(2-3),119-145.
76. Vasta, R.(Ed.)(1992).Six theories of child development: Revised formulations and current issues.Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
77. Vico, G.(1999).The new science of giambattista vico: Unabridged translation of the third edition (1744) with the addition of "practic of the new science".Cornell University Press.
78. Vico, G.(1990).On the study methods of our time.Cornell University Press.
79. Vygotsky, L. S.(1978).Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes.Harvard University Press.
80. Wertsch, J. V.(Ed.)(1981).The concept of activity in soviet psychology.Routledge.
81. Wood, D.,Bruner, J. S.,Ross, G.(1976).The role of tutoring in problem solving.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry,17(2),89-100.
82. Wyatt, T. D.(2010).Pheromones and signature mixtures: Defining species-wide signals and variable cues for identity in both invertebrates and vertebrates.Journal of Comparative Physiology A,196(10),685-700.
83. 呂玉琴, Y.-C.,溫世展, S.-C.(2001)。國小、國中與高中教師的數學教學相關信念之探討。國立臺北師範學院學報，14，459-490。
84. 林素微, S.-W.(2018)。數學課室教師支持與學生數學素養關聯探討：以 PISA 2012 臺灣資料為例。臺灣數學教師，39(1)，1-17。
85. 洪儷瑜, L.-Y.(2012)。由補救教學到三層級學習支援。教育研究月刊，221，13-24。
86. 唐淑華, S.-H.(2013)。帶著希望的羽翼飛翔—談補救教學在十二年國教的定位與方向。教育人力與專業發展，30(1)，1-11。
87. 教育部（2011）: 〈國民小學及國民中學補救教學實施方案〉。https://priori.moe.gov.tw/download/2014-2-5-10-15-30-nf1.pdf [Ministry of Education. (2011). Implementation plan for remedial teaching in national elementary schools and national middle schools. https://priori.moe.gov.tw/download/2014-2-5-10-15-30-nf1.pdf]
88. 謝琬如, W.-R.(2011)。國立暨南國際大學=National Chi Nan University。