以劇變模型分析高速公路實施擁擠收費之駕駛人路線移轉行為

A Catastrophe Model for Analyzing Driver Route Switching Behavior Due to Congestion Charging on Freeways

10.6402/TPJ.201106.0133

郭奕妏(Yi-Wen Kuo)

擁擠收費 ； 路線移轉行為 ； 移轉障礙 ； 尖點劇變模型 ； Congestion charging ； Route switching behavior ； Switching barrier ； Cusp catastrophe model

運輸計劃季刊

40卷2期（2011 / 06 / 30）

133 - 160

繁體中文

未來高速公路全面實施電子計程收費後，在收費技術可行的前提下，為有效落實擁擠管理，可配合推動擁擠收費政策。不同於過去研究採個體選擇模式，本研究應用尖點劇變模型，探究小汽車駕駛人在假設性擁擠過行费率情境下之路線移轉行為，並了解其可能存在的非線性特徵。實證研究針對臺灣西部高速公路小汽車駕駛人進行問卷調查，共蒐集1,121份有效樣本。透過定量與定性分析方法，選定路線移轉行為作為狀態變數，單位通行費率與移轉障礙則分別為控制變數中之正則因子與分裂因子，校估出四種擁擠情境下之路線移轉行為模型，並檢定控制空間中六個區域的樣本結構分布比例的差異性，進一步解釋駕駛人路線移轉行為產生之發散性、突變性、滯後性與雙重性等劇變特徵。當駕駛人認知的移轉障礙較高，且在擁擠通行費率每公里訂為1.2及1.5元時，路線移轉行為最易發生不連續變化現象。

For congestion management purposes, a congestion charging strategy could be implemented to accompany the oncoming implementation of the electronic distance-based charging strategy on freeways. Different from previous studies using discrete choice models to discuss driver route switching behavior this paper attempted to apply the cusp catastrophe model to discuss driver route switching behavior under various congestion charging scenarios and describe their non-linear characteristics. According to the empirical study, the questionnaire survey was conducted to collect 1,121 valid samples from freeway drivers traveling in western Taiwan. By means of quantitative and qualitative analysis, the proposed behavioral model used ”route switching behavior” as the state variable and ”switching barrier” and ”a unit of charging rate” as control variables. The test of independence was performed to check sample structures for six areas of the control space, and the catastrophe characteristics, such as divergence, catastrophe, hysteresis, and bimodality, of switching behavior were discussed. A higher switching barrier would easily cause discontinuous switching behavior while encountering a unit of charging rates, especially at NT$1.2/km and NT$1.5/km.

1. 周榮昌、陳志成、翁美娟(2003)。即時交通資訊對高速公路使用者路線移轉之影響。運輸學刊，15(1)，25-47。
   連結：
2. 馮正民、郭奕妏(2007)。路線資訊類型對高速公路小汽車駕駛人路線移轉行為之影響。運輸計劃季刊，36(4)，477-508。
   連結：
3. 馮正民、郭奕妏(2007)。廣播資訊接受度及移轉障礙對高速公路小汽車駕駛人路線移轉行為意向之影響。運輸計劃季刊，36(1)，1-30。
   連結：
4. 馮正民、黃昱凱(2006)。轉移成本與服務品質對店配取貨點選擇行為之影響。運輸計劃季刊，35(4)，391-426。
   連結：
5. 褚志鵬(2001)。主線收費及匝道收費政策下之擁擠定價分析。運輸計劃季刊，30(3)，513-538。
   連結：
6. 褚志鵬、葉岦陞(2001)。道路擁擠收費政策在考量異質旅次之靜態分析。運輸計劃季刊，30(1)，33-61。
   連結：
7. 賴禎秀(2001)。階梯式擁擠收費體制下最佳收費階段數之研究。運輸計劃季刊，30(2)，253-274。
   連結：
8. 賴禎秀、吳志仁(2002)。高速公路實施匝道電子收費下最佳費率與經濟效益評估之研究。運輸計劃季刊，31(1)，37-57。
   連結：
9. Pigou, A. C., The Economic of Welfare, 1st ed., Macmillan & Co., London, 1920.
10. Knight, F. H.,“Some Fallacies in the Interpretation of Social Cost", Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol.38, 1924, pp. 582-606.
11. Acha-Daza, J. A.,Hall, F. L.(1993).A Graphical Comparison of the Predictions for Speed Given by Catastrophe Theory and Some Classic Models.Transportation Research Record,1457,119-124.
12. Acha-Daza, J. A.,Hall, F. L.(1994).The Application of Catastrophe Theory to Traffic Flow Variables.Transportation Research,28B,235-250.
13. Adler, T.,Ristau, W.,Falzarano, S.(1999).Traveler Reactions to Congestion Pricing Concepts for New York's Tappan Zee Bridge.Transportation Research Record,1659,87-96.
14. Alexander, R. A.,Herbert, G. R.,Deshon, R. P.,Hanges, P. J.(1992).An Examination of Least Squares Regression Modeling of Catastrophe Theory.Psychological Bulletin,111(2),366-374.
15. Arnott, R. J.,de Palma, A.,Lindsey, R.(1990).Departure Time and Route Choice for the Morning Commute.Transportation Research,24B(3),209-228.
16. Arnott, R. J.,de Palma, A.,Lindsey, R.(1990).Economics of a Bottleneck.Journal of Urban Economics,27,111-130.
17. Braid, R. M.(1989).Uniform Versus Peak-load Pricing of a Bottleneck with Elastic Demand.Journal of Urban Economics,26(3),320-327.
18. Burris, M. W.(2003).The Toll-Price Component of Travel Demand Elasticity.International of Transport Economics,30(1),45-59.
19. Burris, M. W.(2003).Application of Variable Tolls on Congestion Toll Road.Journal of Transportation Engineering,129(4),354-361.
20. Byrne, D. G.,Mazanov, J.,Gregson, R. A. M.(2001).A Cusp Catastrophe Analysis of Changes Adolescent Smoking Behaviour in Response Smoking Prevention Programs.Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences,5(2),115-137.
21. Chidley, J.,Lewis, P.,Walker, P.(1978).The Cusp Catastrophe as a Market Planning AID.Behavioral Science,23,351-359.
22. Cohen, Y.(1987).Commuter Welfare under Peak-load Congestion Tolls : Who Gains and Who Loses?.International Journal of Transport Economics,14,239-266.
23. Feng, C. M.,Huang, Y. K.(2007).An Analysis on Choice Behavior on the Pick-Up Point for the E-commerce Retailing Delivery Using a Cusp Catastrophe Model.Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies,7,918-932.
24. Frankena, M. W.(1979).Urban Transportation Economics.Canada:Butterworth & Canada Ltd.
25. Gilmore, R.(1981).Catastrophe Theory for Science and Engineers.New York:John Wiley & Sons.
26. Hall, F. L.(1987).An Interpretation of Speed-Flow Concentration Relationships Using Catastrophe Theory.Transportation Research,21A,335-344.
27. Jou, R. C.,Lam, S. H.,Liu, Y. H.,Chen, K. H.(2005).Route Switching Behavior on Freeways with the Provision of Different Types of Real-Time Traffic Information.Transportation Research,39A(5),445-461.
28. Kauffman, R. G.,Oliva, T. A.(1994).Multivariate Catastrophe Model Estimation: Method and Application.Academy of Management Journal,37(1),206-221.
29. Lange, L.,McDade, S.,Oliva, T. A.(2001).Technological Choice and Network Externalities: A Catastrophe Model Analysis of Firm Software Adoption for Competing Operating Systems.Structural Change and Economic Dynamics,12,9-57.
30. Navin, F.(1986).Traffic Congestion Catastrophes.Transportation Planning and Technology,11,19-25.
31. Oliva, T. A.,Desarbo, W. S.,Day, D. L.,Jedidi, K.(1987).GEMCAT: A GEneral Multivariate Methodology for Estimation CATastrophe Models.Behavior Science,32,121-137.
32. Oliva, T. A.,Oliver, R. L.,MacMillian, I. C.(1992).A Catastrophe Model for Developing Service Satisfaction Strategies.Journal of Marketing,56,83-95.
33. Persaud, B. N.,Hall, F. L.(1989).Catastrophe Theory and Patterns in 30-Second Freeway Data-Implications for Incident Detection.Transportation Research,23A,103-113.
34. Pushkar, A.,Hall, F. L.,Acha-Daza, J. A.(1994).Estimation of Speeds from Single-Loop Freeway Flow and Occupancy Data Using Cusp Catastrophe Theory Model.Transportation Research Record,1398,149-157.
35. Saunders, P. T.(1980).An Introduction to Catastrophe Theory.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
36. Vickrey, W. S.(1969).Congestion Theory and Transport Investment.American Economic Review,59,251-261.
37. Vikram, S.,Ruth, C. K.(1998).An Application of the Cusp Catastrophe Model to User Information Satisfaction.Information & Management,34,41-53.
38. Wales, D. J.(2001).A Microscopic Basis for the Global Appearance of Energy Landscapes.Science,293,2067-2070.
39. Zeeman, E. C.(1974).On the Unstable Behavior of Stock Exchanges.Journal of Mathematical Economics,1,39-49.
40. Zeeman, E. C.(1977).Catastrophe Theory: Selected Papers (1972-1977).New York:Addison-Wesley.
41. 周榮昌、趙延祥、蕭心怡、吳萍樺、許采蘋(2002)。自用車實用者對道路定價接受意向之探討。中華民國運輸學會第十七屆學術論文研討會論文集
42. 邱皓政(2008)。量化研究與統計分析。臺北:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
43. 郭奕妏、黃昱凱、楊敬怡(2008)。以劇變模型發展選擇行為之行銷策略：以選擇旅行社網站為例。2008管理評論評論年會暨第一屆前瞻管理學術研討會
44. 陳敦基、曾淑玲(2002)。國道高速公路通行費及徵收方式之檢討。中華民國運輸學會第十七屆學術論文研討會論文集
45. 溫傑華、馮乃穎(2004)。高速公路電子計程收費對用路人旅運行為之影響。中華民國運輸學會第19屆學術論文研討會論文集
46. 溫傑華、蔡政霖(2004)。高速公路電子計程收費與擁擠定價對用路人旅運行為之影響。中華民國運輸學會第19屆學術論文研討會論文集
47. 褚志鵬、葉岦陞(2004)。尖峰延展模型下異質彈性旅次之次佳道路擁擠定價政策。東吳經濟商學報，47，33-58。
48. 藍武王、張勝雄(1987)。道路擁擠費之設計與分析。中華民國運輸學會第二屆學術論文研討會

1. 郭奕妏(2012)。以尖點劇變模型探討油價與高鐵折扣票價對城際運具選擇行為之影響。運輸計劃季刊，41(3)，253-278。
2. 郭奕妏(2015)。小汽車駕駛人對高速公路電子收費eTag 服務之使用意願分析。運輸計劃季刊，44(3)，215-242。
3. 黃昱凱(2021)。何時出發較好：以劇變模型分析出發時間的決策行為。運輸學刊，33(1)，89-133。