「國小資優生創造傾向量表」之編製研究

Development of a Creative Tendency Scale for Gifted Students in Taiwan Elementary Schools

10.6172/BSE201203.3701004

李偉清(Wei-Ching Lee)

創造傾向 ； 資優生 ； 驗證性因素分析 ； confirmatory factor analysis ； creative tendency ； gifted students

特殊教育研究學刊

37卷1期（2012 / 03 / 01）

79 - 102

繁體中文

本研究旨在針對國小資優生編製一份具有信、效度之創造傾向量表，並比較不同背景資優生在此一測量工具上是否具有組間的不變性。該量表乃根據Williams（1980，1993）的創造傾向理論並參考林幸台和王木榮（1994）的「威廉斯創造性傾向量表」所編製而成，採分層隨機與叢集取樣合併之抽樣方式共獲得有效樣本894份，再依分析的需要將此一樣本隨機分為三等分。先以第一組樣本作探索性因素分析和項目分析，再以第二組樣本進行結構方程模式之驗證性因素分析，然後用第三組樣本做此一測量模式之複核效化，最後則採多群組分析進行逐漸嚴苛之多層次檢驗。結果顯示：本量表之因素結構良好具有建構效度，信度考驗也達到令人非常滿意的標準，且蒐集的資料適配提出的理論模式，而模式的穩定性也通過了最寬鬆至最嚴苛複製策略之統計考驗，另本研究也證實了此一測量工具對不同背景之資優生而言均具有測量的恆等性。

Purpose: This study constructs a reliable and valid creative tendency scale for gifted students in Taiwan elementary schools and compares whether groups invariance exists for the different backgrounds of gifted students in this scale. Methods: Based on the theories by Williams (1980, 1993) and referring to the Williams Creative Tendency Scale by Lin and Wang (1994), a designed scale, the Creative Tendency Scale for Gifted Students of Elementary Schools, was used to survey gifted students in Taiwan elementary schools. A total of 894 valid samples were collected by stratified random sampling and cluster sampling. The samples were divided into three sets by a random procedure. The first sample set was analyzed by item analysis and exploratory factor analysis to discover the best theoretical construction and most appropriate items. The second sample set was analyzed by confirmatory factor analysis using structure equation modeling to evaluate the goodness of fit between collected data and the proposed theoretical model in this study. The third sample set was tested by cross-validation. Finally, the different strictness levels in multi-groups were analyzed. Results: The results show factors with great structures and the presence of construction validities in this scale. The reliabilities of the data were also satisfactory. The collected data fitted to the theoretical model and this model stability passed the statistical tests from most loose to most tight replication strategies. Conclusions/ Implications: Based on the previous results, 3 conclusions were made, listed as follows: (1) The Creative Tendency Scale for Gifted Students of Elementary Schools has good reliability and validity and can be used to evaluate the creative tendency of gifted students in Taiwan elementary schools. (2) The Williams (1980, 1993) relational model of creative tendency is a stable, predictive, and valid model. (3) The Williams (1980, 1993) relational model of creative tendency between gifted and regular students of elementary schools is the same. In this study, measurement invariance is confirmed for gifted students with different backgrounds. The study has the following 5 recommendations: (1) This scale only applies to the analysis of creative tendency for gifted students and can not be used to assess cognitive aspects of creativity. (2) This study suggests amending and improving poor indicators of this scale to enhance the individual item reliability of observable variables of this scale. (3) Objects of this study can be extended to other stages of education or other types of gifted students, to assess whether a validity extension is still present in this measurement tool. (4) This study suggests conducting a multi-group analysis for other background variables of gifted students to understand whether measurement invariance exists in this scale. (5) The study suggests adopting a two-stage (pilot study and main study) random sampling of research procedures to view and verify whether this scale possesses appropriate reliability and validity.

1. Almahboub, S. F.(2000).Denton, TX,University of North Texas.
2. Amabile, T. M.(1988).A model of creativity and innovation in organizations.Research in Organizational Behavior,10,123-167.
3. Beeko, E. O.(2005).Pittsburgh, PA,University of Pittsburgh.
4. Byrne, B. M.(2001).Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
5. Clark, B.(2002).Growing up gifted: Developing the potential of children at home at school.Upper Saddle River, NJ:Merrill/Prentice Hall.
6. Claxton, A. F.,Pannells, T. C.,Rhoads, P. A.(2005).Developmental trends in the creativity of school-age children.Creativity Research Journal,17(4),327-335.
7. Edwin, C. S.,Emily, J. S.,John, C. H.(2005).The creative personality.Gifted Child Quarterly,49,300-314.
8. Florida, R.(2002).The rise of the creative class.New York:Basic Books.
9. Hair, J. F.,Anderson, R. E.,Tatham, R. L.,Black, W. C.(1998).Multivariate data analysis.Upper Saddle river, NJ:Prentice Hall.
10. Hallman, R.(1963).The commonness of creativity.Education Theory,13,19-33.
11. Hsiao, H. S.,Wong, K. H.,Wang, M. J.,Yu, K. C.,Chang, K. E.,Sung, Y. T.(2006).Using cognitive affective interaction model to construct on-line game for creativity.Lecture Notes in Computer Science,3942,409-418.
12. Hwang, W. Y.,Chen, N. S.,Dung, J. J.,Yang, Y. L.(2007).Multiple representation skills and creativity effects on mathematical problem solving using a multimedia whiteboard system.Educational Technology & Society,10(2),191-212.
13. Kagan, D. M.(1988).Measurements of divergent and complex thinking.Educational and Psychological Measurement,48,873-884.
14. Kaufman, R. B.,Beghetto, J. C.(2009).Beyond big and little: The four C model of creativity.Review of General Psychology,13,1-12.
15. Kline, R. B.(1998).Principles and practice of structural equation modeling.New York:The Guilford Press.
16. Knezek, G.,Miyashita, K.(1993).Learner dispositions related to primary school computing in three nations: 1992 results.Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association,Atlanta, GA:
17. Little, T. D.(1997).Mean and covariance structures (MACS) analyses of cross-cultureal data: Practical and theoretical issues.Multivariate Behavioral Research,32,53-76.
18. Liu, M. J.,Shih, W. L.,Ma, L. Y.(2010).Are children with Asperger syndrome creative in divergent thinking and feeling? A brief report.Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders,5(1),294-298.
19. Maddux, W.,Galinsky, A.(2009).Cultural borders and mental barriers: The relationship between living abroad and creativity.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,96(5),1047-1061.
20. Magoun, D.,Eaton, V.,Owens, C.(2002).IT and the attitudes of middle school girls: A follow-up study.National Educational Computing Conference,San Antonio, TX:
21. Oldham, G. R.,Cummings, A.(1996).Employee creativity: Per-sonal and contextual factors and work.Academy of Manage-ment Journal,39,607-634.
22. Price, V.,Tewksbury, D.(1996).Measuring the third-person effect of news: The impact of question order, contrast and knowledge.International Journal of Public Opinion Research,8(2),120-141.
23. Qian, M.,Plucker, J. A.,Shen, J.(2010).A model of Chinese adolescents' creative personality.Creativity Research Journal,22(1),62-67.
24. Rookey, T. J.(1973).ERIC Document Reproduction ServiceERIC Document Reproduction Service,未出版
25. Rookey, T. J.(1973).Pennsylvania assessment of creative tendency: Norms-technical manual.Princeton, NJ:Educational Testing Service.
26. Tabachnick, B. G.,Fidell, L. S. F.(2001).Using multivariate ststistics.Boston, MA:Allyn & Bacon.
27. Walberg, H. J.(1982).Child traits and environmental conditions of highly eminent adults.Gifted Child Quarterly,25,103-107.
28. Wells, D.,Donnell, A. J.,Thomas, A.,Mills, M. S.,Miller, M.(2006).Creative deviance: A study of the relationship between creative behavior and the social construct of deviance.College Student Journal,40(1),74-77.
29. Williams, F. E.(1993).Creativity assessment packet (CAP): Examiner's manual.Austin, TX:Pro-ed.
30. Williams, F. E.(1980).Creativity assessment packet (CAP): Manual.Buffalo, NY:D.O.K Publishers.
31. Woodrum, D. T.,Savage, B. S.(1994).Children who are learning disabled/gifted: Where do they belong?.Educational Research,36(1),83-89.
32. 方瑋、邱發忠(2009)。軍事組織創造傾向量表的發展。復興崗學報，95，173-204。
33. 毛連塭編、郭有遹編、陳龍安編、林幸台編(2000)。創造力研究。臺北=Taipei, Taiwan:心理=Psychological Publishing。
34. 王木榮、林幸台(1986)。威廉斯創造力測驗修訂研究。特殊教育研究學刊，2，231-250。
35. 王立永、李小平、張金秀(2006)。大學生創造性傾向特點的研究。高校保健醫學研究與實踐，3(3)，14-17。
36. 申繼亮、王鑫、師保國(2005)。青少年創造性傾向的結構與發展特徵研究。心理發展與教育，21(4)，28-33。
37. 石瑋玲(2009)。國立高雄師範大學特殊教育學系=National Kaohsiung Normal University。
38. 朱曉紅(2001)。兒童學習動機類型與創造力傾向關係的研究。南京師大學報（社會科學版），6，90-95。
39. 余民寧(2006)。潛在變項模式─SIMPLIS 的應用。臺北=Taipei, Taiwan:高等教育=Higher Education Publishing。
40. 吳昆壽(2009)。資優教育概論。臺北=Taipei, Taiwan:心理=Psychological Publishing。
41. 吳明隆(2006)。SPSS 統計應用學習實務─問卷分析與應用統計。臺北=Taipei, Taiwan:知城數位科技=Acore Digital Technology Publishing。
42. 吳衛東(2009)。小學至初中學生創造性傾向的發展研究。石家莊學院學報，11(3)，81-85。
43. 李小平、張慶林、何洪波(2005)。中學生創造性傾向發展的初步測試。西南師範大學學報（人文社會科學版），31(6)，64-67。
44. 李茂能(2006)。結構方程模式軟體Amos 之簡介及其在測驗編製上之應用─Graphics & Basic。臺北=Taipei, Taiwan:心理=Psychological Publishing。
45. 周宜平(2004)。國立高雄師範大學科學教育研究所=National Kaohsiung Normal University。
46. 周明武(2007)。國立新竹教育大學人資處美勞教學碩士班=National Hsinchu University of Education。
47. 林后泰(2004)。國立臺灣師範大學工業教育學系=National Taiwan Normal University。
48. 林幸台(1995)。威廉斯創造力測驗修訂報告。特殊教育研究學刊，11，133-149。
49. 林幸台、王木榮(1994)。威廉斯創造力測驗。臺北=Taipei, Taiwan:心理=Psychological Publishing。
50. 邱瓊玉(2008)。國立臺灣科技大學技術及職業教育研究所=National Taiwan University of Science and Technology。
51. 侯日霞(2010)。大學生創造力傾向與人格特徵的關係研究。濟寧醫學院學報，33(2)，130-131。
52. 洪文東(2002)。創造型兒童之思考特性與科學創造力的關聯性。屏東師院學報，16，355-394。
53. 孫鳳吟(1999)。創作性紙影戲劇教學對國小學生創造力傾向之影響研究。藝術論衡，5，57-78。
54. 師保國、許晶晶(2009)。家庭環境對大學生創造性傾向的預測作用。首都師範大學學報（社會科學版），5，71-77。
55. 徐毓苓(2008)。國立臺灣師範大學創造力發展碩士在職專班=National Taiwan Normal University。
56. 徐霈(2008)。臺北市立教育大學課程與教學研究所在職進修專班=Taipei Municipal University of Education。
57. 許淑婷(2005)。國立高雄師範大學科學教育研究所=National Kaohsiung Normal University。
58. 曾繁鈞(2001)。國立屏東師範學院國民教育研究所=National Pingtung Teachers College。
59. 黃芳銘(2007)。結構方程模式─理論與應用。臺北=Taipei, Taiwan:五南=Wu-Nan Book。
60. 黃信義(2006)。銘傳大學教育研究所=Ming Chuan University。
61. 黃朝凱(2003)。國立嘉義大學國民教育研究所=National Chiayi University。
62. 黃馨儀(2007)。國立屏東教育大學教育科技研究所=National Pingtung University of Education。
63. 黃綉薰(2010)。慈濟大學教育研究所=Tzu Chi University。
64. 楊世安(2004)。國立嘉義大學科學教育研究所=National Chiayi University。
65. 葉玉珠(2006)。創造力教學─過去、現在與未來。臺北=Taipei, Taiwan:心理=Psychological Publishing。
66. 葛纓、何向東、呂進(2006)。大學生邏輯思維能力與創造力傾向關係的研究。青年探索，4，50-51。
67. 劉世南、郭誌光(2002)。創造力理論的發展：一個心理構念演進的省思。資優教育季刊，85，20-30。
68. 樓永堅(1999)。問題次序的訪答效應之初探。調查研究，7，531。
69. 潘朝昱(2008)。國立臺灣師範大學創造力發展碩士在職專班=National Taiwan Normal University。
70. 蔡笑岳、朱雨潔(2007)。中小學生創造性傾向、智力及學業成績的相關研究。心理發展與教育，2，36-41。
71. 鄭磊磊、劉愛倫(2000)。思維風格與創造性傾向關係的研究。應用心理學，2，14-20。
72. 蘇瑋翔(2008)。國立台南大學數位學習科技系=National University of Tainan。
73. 蘇碧麗(2008)。國立中正大學教育研究所=National Chung Cheng University。
74. 饒智凱(2007)。國立中正大學運動與休閒教育研究所=National Chung Cheng University。

1. 許淑婷、洪振方、林日宗(2014)。不同科學學習動機、創造傾向、師生互動對國一學生在科學創造力表現之分析。教育科學期刊，13(2)，1-33。
2. 蕭佳純(2014)。延宕交叉相關與潛在成長模式在創造力傾向與科技創造力關係間之分析。特殊教育研究學刊，39(2)，87-107。
3. 蕭佳純(2017)。國小學童正向情緒與創造力關聯之研究：以創造力傾向及創意自我效能為中介變項。教育研究與發展期刊，13(4)，57-84。
4. 蕭佳純(2017)。科學創造力課程成效之縱貫性分析。科學教育學刊，25(1)，47-73。
5. 謝佳諺、蔡桂芳、陳振明、陳武雄(2017)。世界盃機器人國際賽參賽選手創造力傾向之調查研究。資優教育論壇，15，53-67。