大學生學習模式與學習成效間關聯之研究：深度取向學習投入為中介變項

A Study of the Relationships Between College Student Learning Modes and Learning Outcomes: Using the Deep Approach to Learning as a Mediator

10.6384/CIQ.201801_21(1).0006

彭耀平(Michael Yao-Ping Peng)；陳榮政(Robin Jung-Cheng Chen)；何希慧(Sophia Shi-Huei Ho)

深度取向學習 ； 探索型學習 ； 學生學習成效 ； 應用型學習 ； deep approach to learning ； explorative learning ； student learning outcomes ； exploitative learning

課程與教學

21卷1期（2018 / 01 / 01）

133 - 157

繁體中文

隨著社會環境不斷變遷，高等教育機構面對學生需求愈趨多樣化。多元的學生特質意謂著大學應提供適性學習的教學環境，並以學生為導向的課程與教學設計來加強其學習策略和參與程度，以提升學生學習成效。本研究運用深度取向學習做為衡量大學生學習投入之中介變項，以探討應用型學習和探索型學習模式對深度取向學習投入的有效性，及學生在認知獲益與非認知獲益之學習成效。本研究收集16所大學校院學生問卷，共取得2,340份有效樣本，以結構方程模式進行分析，以瞭解各變數間之關係。研究結果顯示：（1）應用型與探索型學習模式對深度取向學習投入具有正向影響；（2）兩種學習模式對學習成效具有正向影響；和（3）深度取向學習投入在兩種學習模式與學習成效間具有顯著的中介效果。據此，本研究針對高等教育機構和教師教學提出具體建言，以供相關研究者參考。

Taiwan higher education continues to change, making higher education institutions (HEIs) strive to meet more and more diversified demands of students. The multiple characteristics of students require HEIs to provide an appropriate teaching environment where students' learning participation can be enhanced through student-oriented learning modes, so as to improve their learning outcomes. Using the deep approach to learning as a mediator, the present study investigated the effectiveness of explorative and exploitative learning modes on the deep approach to learning and student learning outcomes. In total, 2,340 valid questionnaires from 16 Taiwanese HEIs were collected and then analyzed by structural equation modeling. The results showed that (1) explorative and exploitative learning modes can positively affect the deep approach to learning; (2) the two learning modes have positive effects on learning outcomes of cognitive and non-cognitive gains; and (3) the deep approach to learning has a significant mediated effect between the learning modes and learning outcomes. Based on the findings, specific suggestions for HEIs and faculty teaching were provided.

1. 何希慧、彭耀平(2016)。臺灣與中國大陸深圳地區大學生學習動機與學習成效發展之比較：以學習模式為中介變項。教育實踐與研究，29(1)，139-171。
   連結：
2. 劉玉玲、薛岳(2013)。國中生數學學業自我概念及數學學習策略與數學學業成就之研究─自我提升模式觀點。課程與教學季刊，16(1)，179-208。
   連結：
3. Bagozzi, R. P.,Yi, Y.(1988).On the evaluation of structural equation models.Journal of the Aacademy of Marketing Science,16(1),74-94.
4. Baron, R. M.,Kenny, D. A.(1986).Moderator mediator variables distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,51(6),1173-1182.
5. Barrie, S. C.(2007).A conceptual framework for the teaching and learning of generic graduate attributes.Studies in Higher Education,32(4),439-458.
6. Beatie, V.,Collins, B.,McInnes, B.(1997).Deep and surface learning: A simple or simplistic dicotomy.Accounting Education,6(1),1-12.
7. Biggs, J.(1992).Why and how do Hong Kong students learn? Using the learning and study process questionnaires.Hong Kong:University of Hong Kong.
8. Biggs, J.(2003).Aligning teaching and assessing to course objectives.International Conference on Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: New Trends and Innovations,Portuguese:
9. Biggs, J.,Kember, D.,Leung, D. Y.(2001).The revised two‐factor study process questionnaire: R‐SPQ‐2F.British Journal of Educational Psychology,71(1),133-149.
10. Biggs, J.,Tang, C.(2011).Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does.London, UK:McGraw-Hill Education.
11. Campbell, C. M.,Cabrera, A. F.(2014).Making the mark: Are grades and deep learning related?.Research in Higher Education,55(5),494-507.
12. Choi, B. K.,Rhee, B. S.(2014).The influences of student engagement, institutional mission, and cooperative learning climate on the generic competency development of Korean undergraduate students.Higher Education,67(1),1-18.
13. Corbett, A. C.(2005).Experiential learning within the process of opportunity identification and exploitation.Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,29(4),473-491.
14. Duff, A.,Boyle, E.,Dunleavy, K.,Ferguson, J.(2004).The relationship between personality, approach to learning and academic performance.Personality and Individual Differences,36(8),1907-1920.
15. Greene, B. A.,Miller, R. B.,Crowson, H. M.,Duke, B. L.,Akey, K. L.(2004).Predicting high school students' cognitive engagement and achievement: Contributions of classroom perceptions and motivation.Contemporary Educational Psychology,29(4),462-482.
16. Guay, F.,Ratelle, C. F.,Chanal, J.(2008).Optimal learning in optimal contexts: The role of self-determination in education.Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne,49(3),233-240.
17. Hair, J. F.,Black, W. C.,Babin, B. J.,Anderson, R. E.(2010).Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective.Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
18. Hau, K. T.,Marsh, H. W.(2004).The use of item parcels in structural equation modelling: Non‐normal data and small sample sizes.British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology,57(2),327-351.
19. Hmelo-Silver, C. E.,Duncan, R. G.,Chinn, C. A.(2007).Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006).Educational Psychologist,42(2),99-107.
20. Jöreskog, K. G.,Sörbom, D.(1993).LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language.Chicago, IL:Scientific Software International.
21. Khamseh, H. M.,Jolly, D. R.(2008).Knowledge transfer in alliances: Determinant factors.Journal of Knowledge Management,12(1),37-50.
22. Kolb, D. A.(1984).Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development.Englewood Cliffs, N:Prentice Hall.
23. Krogh, G.(Ed.),Roos, J.(Ed.)(1996).Managing knowledge-perspectives on cooperation and competition.London, England:Sage.
24. Kuh, G. D.,Kinzie, J.,Buckley, J. A.,Bridges, B. K.,Hayek, J. C.(2006).What matters to student success: A review of the literature.Commissioned report for the national symposium on postsecondary student success: Spearheading a dialog on student success,Washington DC:
25. Laird, T. F. N.,Shoup, R.,Kuh, G. D.(2006).Measuring deep approaches to learning using the National Survey of Student Engagement.annual meeting of the Association for Institutional Research,Chicago, IL:
26. Laird, T. F. N.,Shoup, R.,Kuh, G. D.,Schwarz, M. J.(2008).The effects of discipline on deep approaches to student learning and college outcomes.Research in Higher Education,49(6),469-494.
27. leunhart, S.(Ed.)(1982).Sociological methodology.San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
28. Li, T.,Greenberg, B. A.,Nicholls, J.(2007).Teaching experiential learning: Adoption of an innovative course in an MBA marketing curriculum.Journal of Marketing Education,29(1),25-33.
29. Liem, A. D.,Lau, S.,Nie, Y.(2008).The role of self-efficacy, task value, and achievement goals in predicting learning strategies, task disengagement, peer relationship, and achievement outcome.Contemporary Educational Psychology,33(4),486-512.
30. Little, T. D.,Cunningham, W. A.,Shahar, G.(2002).To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits.Structural Equation Modeling,9(2),151-173.
31. MacKinnon, D. P.,Dwyer, J. H.(1993).Estimating mediated effects in prevention studies.Evaluation Review,17,144-158.
32. MacKinnon, D. P.,Warsi, G.,Dwyer, J. H.(1995).A simulation study of mediated effect measures.Multivariate Behavioral Research,30,41-62.
33. Marginson, S.(2011).Higher education and public good.Higher Education Quarterly,65(4),411-433.
34. Maringe, F.,Sing, N.(2014).Teaching large classes in an increasingly internationalising higher education environment: Pedagogical, quality and equity issues.Higher Education,67(6),761-782.
35. Marton, F.,Säljö, R.(1976).On qualitative differences in learning: I-Outcome and process.British Journal of Educational Psychology,46(1),4-11.
36. Oleson, A.,Hora, M. T.(2014).Teaching the way they were taught? Revisiting the sources of teaching knowledge and the role of prior experience in shaping faculty teaching practices.Higher Education,68(1),29-45.
37. Pace, C.(1984).Measuring the quality of college students experience: An account of the development and use of the college student experiences questionnarie.Los Angeles, CA:Higher Education Research Institute, University of California Press.
38. Pascarella, E. T.,Terenzini, P. T.(2005).How college affects students: Vol. 2 A decade of research.San Francisco, CA:John Wiley & Sons.
39. Pascarella, E. T.,Terenzini, P. T.(1991).How college aflects students. Findings and insights from twenty years of research.San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
40. Pascarella, E. T.,Wang, J.-S.,Trolian, T. L.,Blaich, C.(2013).How the instructional and learning environments of liberal arts colleges enhance cognitive development.Higher Education,66(5),569-583.
41. Philip, C. T.,Unruh, K. P.,Lachman, N.,Pawlina, W.(2008).An explorative learning approach to teaching clinical anatomy using student generated content.Anatomical Sciences Education,1(3),106-110.
42. Pike, G. R.,Kuh, G. D.,McCormick, A. C.,Ethington, C. A.,Smart, J. C.(2011).If and when money matters: The relationships among educational expenditures, student engagement and students' learning outcomes.Research in Higher Education,52(1),81-106.
43. Pike, G. R.,Smart, J. C.,Ethington, C. A.(2012).The mediating effects of student engagement on the relationships between academic disciplines and learning outcomes: An extension of Holland's theory.Research in Higher Education,53(5),550-575.
44. Pike, G. R.,Smart, J. C.,Kuh, G. D.,Hayek, J. C.(2006).Educational expenditures and student engagement: When does money matter?.Research in Higher Education,47(7),847-872.
45. Prosser, M.,Millar, R.(1989).The "how" and "what" of learning physics.European Journal of Psychology of Education,4(4),513-528.
46. Ramsden, P.(2003).Learning to teach in higher education.London, England:Routledge.
47. Reason, R. D.,Cox, B. E.,McIntosh, K.,Terenzini, P. T.(2010).Deep learning as an individual, conditional, and contextual influence on first-year student outcomes.Annual Forum of the Association for Institutional Research,Chicago, IL:
48. Schaufeli, W. B.,Salanova, M.(2007).Efficacy or inefficacy, that's the question: Burnout and work engagement, and their relationships with efficacy beliefs.Anxiety, Stress, and Coping,20(2),177-196.
49. Schaufeli, W. B.,Salanova, M.,González-Romá, V.,Bakker, A. B.(2002).The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach.Journal of Happiness Sudies,3(1),71-92.
50. Shin, J. C.,Harman, G.(2009).New challenges for higher education: Global and Asia-Pacific perspectives.Asia Pacific Education Review,10(1),1-13.
51. Smart, J. C.,Feldman, K. A.,Ethington, C. A.(2000).Academic disciplines: Holland's theory and the study of college students and faculty.Nashville, TN:Vanderbilt University Press.
52. Snyder, R. A.,Raben, C. S.,Farr, J. L.(1980).A model for the systemic evaluation of human resource development programs.Academy of Management Review,5(3),431-444.
53. Tagg, J.(2003).The learning paradigm college.Bolton, MA:Anker Publishing.
54. Taylor, B. J.,Webber, K. L.,Jacobs, G. J.(2013).Institutional research in light of internationalization, growth, and competition.New Directions for Institutional Research,2013(157),5-22.
55. Trow, M.(1973).,未出版
56. 何希慧、彭耀平(2016)。運用學習理論之跨層次與雙面兼具觀點分析台灣大學生最適學習路徑之研究。教育學報，44(1)，51-77。
57. 教育部 （ 2013 ）。教育部補助大學校院推動課程分流計畫要點。取自http://edu.law.moe.gov.tw/LawContent.aspx?id=GL001190

1. 曾煥裕,陳君儀,林大森(2021)。台灣社會工作學系學生的學習成效評估與勞力市場意向。社會與區域發展學報，6(2)，45-89。
2. 陳逸聰(2020)。室內設計職場與設計實務教學之行動研究。國際數位媒體設計學刊，12(1)，60-72。
3. 方瑀紳(2021)。大學本科會計專業人才培養課程體系規劃之比較：以廣東省三所大學為例。學校行政，134，80-93。
4. 黃瑞榮(2022)。體育教師創意教學行為對大學生學習投入與學習滿意影響之跨層次研究。運動休閒管理學報，19(1)，20-37。
5. 賴英娟,巫博瀚(2022)。國中生所知覺到的教師自主支持、自我效能、任務價值對學習投入之影響。教育心理學報，53(3)，543-564。
6. 羅天一,盧希鵬,張翠園(2019)。有效教學結構BOPPPS應用於服裝設計教學之研究。課程與教學，22(4)，97-121。
7. 王亭文(2022)。CDIO體育課程設計與傳統體育課程設計對大專生學習成效之比較。大專體育學刊，24(2)，204-220。
8. 張媛甯(2021)。應用MAPS教學法於科技大學「金融市場」課程及其對學生學習成果影響之研究。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊，14(3)，57-87。
9. 周芳怡(2019)。通識課程落實大學社會責任之行動研究。通識學刊：理念與實務，7(1)，1-31+33。
10. (2024)。虛實混成式翻轉學習對網頁設計基礎課程學習者學習投入與學習成效之影響。修平學報，48，129-151。
11. (2024)。學生擔任大學新生營隊隊輔角色認知與學習經驗之研究。實踐博雅學報，35，57-76。