與心理師跨專業合作在輔導教師角色壓力與工作滿意度的中介角色

江守峻; 陳婉真; 陳羽柔; 洪逸珊; 彭秀玲

doi:10.3966/172851862020010057005

山西大学，您好！

感谢采购，人社期刊库｜人社论文库，期间：2024/01/01~2024/12/31

感谢试用，科学期刊库｜科学论文库，期间：2024/10/20~2025/01/20

浏览高级检索

关闭
检索检索高级检索出版物检索
浏览期刊主题浏览核心期刊浏览期刊拼音浏览

关闭

查询符号(半角)	查询符号意义说明
空格	表示为「AND」两个查询词之交集
双引号 ( " " )	片语以双引号标示开始及结束，而且只寻找出现顺序相同的字词，例： " image process "
?	表示一个字母切截，输入两个?表两个字母，依此类推，例：输入「Appl?」，查得结果应为appl e , appl y … ( 常用于英文字查询 )
*	表示不限字母切截，由0~n. 例：输入「appl*」，查得结果应为appl e , appl es , appl y , appl ied , appl ication … ( 常用于英文字查询 )
AND、OR、NOT	布尔逻辑组合关键字，用来扩大或缩小查询范围的技巧。 (1) AND ：缩小查询范围 (2) OR ：扩大查询范围(3) NOT：排除不相关的范围

DOI 是数位物件识别码（ D igital O bject I dentifier ）的简称，
为物件在网路上的唯一识别码，可用于永久连结并引用目标物件。

使用DOI作为永久连结

每个DOI号前面加上「 http://dx.doi.org/ 」便成为永久网址。
如以DOI号为 10.5297/ser.1201.002 的文献为例，此文献的永久连结便是： http://dx.doi.org/ 10.5297/ser.1201.002 。
日后不论出版单位如何更动此文献位置，永久连结所指向的位置皆会即时更新，不再错失重要的研究。

引用含有DOI的文献

有DOI的文献在引用时皆应同时引用DOI。若使用APA、Chicago以外未规范DOI的引用格式，可引用DOI永久连结。

DOI可强化引用精确性、增强学术圈连结，并给予使用者跨平台的良好使用经验，目前在全世界已有超过五千万个对象申请DOI。如想对DOI的使用与概念有进一步了解，请参考（）。

ACI:

数据来源：Academic Citation Index，简称ACI

台湾最大的引用文献资料库，目前收录台湾与港澳地区所出版的人文学、社会学领域学术期刊之书目资料与参考文献，总期刊量超过690种，每年定期公布收录期刊的影响指数(Impact Factor)等指标给大众，并提供专家学者与学术单位实用的计量与分析功能。

五年影响指数（5-Year Impact Factor）：某一期刊前五年所出版的文章在当年度的平均被引用次数。

公式：（前五年发表论文在统计年的被引用次数）÷（前五年论文产出论文总篇数）

例如：A期刊2017年之五年影响指数

(A期刊2012-2016年发表论文在2017年的被引总次数)/(A期刊2012-2016年发表的论文总数)

什么是预刊文章？

为提供读者最前线之学术资讯，于期刊文献获同意刊登后、纸本印制完成前，率先于网路线上发表之文章即为预刊文章。预刊文章尚未有卷期、页次及出版日期资讯，但可藉由DOI号识别。 DOI号是文献的数位身份证字号，不论预刊或正式出版皆不会改变，读者可点击DOI连结，或于DOI号前面加上「 http://dx.doi.org/ 」连结到文献目前最新版本。

如何引用预刊文章？

请使用预刊文章的线上发表日期及DOI号来引用该篇文献。

引用范例(视不同引文格式规范可能有所差异)：

作者姓名。文章篇名。期刊名称。 YYYY/MM/DD线上预先发表。

doi:DOI 号

来源数据

P121 - 148

社会科学 > 心理学
社会科学 > 教育学

DOI： 10.7082/CJGC

书目管理工具

相关连结

问题回报

全文下载

与心理师跨专业合作在辅导教师角色压力与工作满意度的中介角色

Psychologist's Interdisciplinary Collaborations as a Mediator between Role Stress and Job Satisfaction in School Counselors

江守峻(Shou-Chun Chiang) ；陈婉真(Wan-Chen Chen) ；陈羽柔(Yu-Jou Chen) ；洪逸珊(Yi-Shan Hung) ；彭秀玲(Hsiu-Ling Peng)

中华辅导与谘商学报； 57 期 (2020 / 01 / 01) ， P121 - 148

繁体中文 DOI： 10.3966/172851862020010057005

工作满意度；心理师；角色压力；跨专业合作；辅导教师； Interdisciplinary collaborations ； job satisfaction ； psychologist ； role stress ； school counselors

0 个人觉得这篇文章赞

摘要 │ 参考文献 (62) │ 被引用文献 (2) │ 国际计量

摘要〈TOP〉

并列摘要〈TOP〉

With the complexity of students' mental issues increasing rapidly during recent years, school guidance counselors are increasingly important and emphasized. However, we still have no research that explores the impact that having psychologists in schools has on school counselors. In this study, we explored the impact of having psychologists in schools on the level of job satisfaction of school counselors. Our research examined the relationships between role stress and job satisfaction of school counselors as well as the mediator role of interdisciplinary collaboration among school counselors and psychologists derived from the 2011 policy that brought psychologists into schools. In the analysis, we applied cluster-stratified sampling to divide Taiwan into four areas: Northern, Middle, Southern, and Eastern areas. We then conducted surveys according to the proportion of the number of schools in the four areas. The first class is county, and the second class is administration area. The participants were junior high school counselors who had worked with psychologists before, and we surveyed 485 school counselors in total. The data analysis included primary and advanced levels - in the primary level, we used descriptive statistics and Pearson's correlation analysis. In the advanced level, we applied structural equation modeling to examine measurement model and structural model. After the model fit was confirmed, we conducted the mediation effects by using the bootstrapping method. This study showed the following results: (1) Among factors in role stress, the score of the score of role conflict was the highest impacting factor, followed by role overload (quality), with role overload (quantity) being the least impacting factor; among factors in interdisciplinary collaboration, the score of professional assistance was the highest impacting factor, followed by collaborative support, with school immersion being the least impacting factor; among factors in job satisfaction, the score of achievement development was the highest impacting factor, followed by professional growth, with interpersonal relationship being the least impacting factor. (2) On the measurement model, the results indicated that the research model fit our data, RMSEA = .064, SRMR = .04, GFI = .97, CFI = .98, IFI = .98, NFI = .96, PCFI = .65, and PNFI = .64. (3) The role stress of school counselors had a significantly negative effect on interdisciplinary collaboration. Also, interdisciplinary collaboration had a significantly positive effect on job satisfaction. (4) interdisciplinary collaboration plays a mediator role between role stress and job satisfaction. On one hand, role stress directly decreases job satisfaction. On the other hand, role stress first negatively associated with interdisciplinary collaboration, which in turn positively associated with job satisfaction. Finally, we suggested that schools should pay more attention to school counselors' role stress and the potential negative impact of interdisciplinary collaboration on their job satisfaction. When school counselors are already under heavy role stress, working with psychologists could turn out to be a negative collaboration, instead of helping school counselors increase their job satisfaction. Additionally, we found out that psychologists tend to provide professional assistance but the level of immersion in schools scored the lowest in regards to collaboration. Thus, we believe that school immersion is important for psychologists who wish to work in the area of school guidance. Future research could add other independent measures into the model to examine the influence of interdisciplinary collaboration between school counselors and psychologists, such as work efficiency, guidance efficiency, or student guidance outcomes. In addition, researchers can also discuss the negative sides of interdisciplinary collaboration, including lack of collaboration awareness, role difference, or school system limitations. Finally, future research could benefit from applying the interdisciplinary collaboration scale on different professionals, particularly social workers, psychiatrists, homeroom teachers, or even administrative officers in order to understand their collaboration impact with school counselors.

参考文献 ( 62 ) 〈TOP〉

方惠生, H. S.,戴嘉南, C. N.(2008)。彰化县专业谘商人员介入国小校园辅导工作实验方案评估研究。谘商辅导学报：高师辅导所刊，18，89-121。
连结：
王丽斐, L.,杜淑芬, S.(2009)。台北市国小辅导人员与谘商心理师之有效跨专业合作研究。教育心理学报，41(S)，295-320。
连结：
王丽斐, L.,杜淑芬, S.,赵晓美, H.(2008)。国小驻校谘商心理师有效谘商策略之探索性研究。教育心理学报，39(3)，413-434。
连结：
形志彬, C. P.,许育光, Y. K.(2014)。学校心理师服务实务与模式建构初探：困境因应与专业发展期待分析。中华辅导与谘商学报，39，117-149。
连结：
林郁伦, Y. L.,陈婉真, W. C.,林耀盛, Y. S.,王锺和, Z. H.(2014)。心理师校园驻区服务的困境、需求与挑战：由台北市国中辅导人员之观点。辅导与谘商学报，36(1)，37-64。
连结：

被引用文献 ( 2 ) 〈TOP〉

国际计量

〈TOP〉

E-mail ：

文章公开取用时，将寄通知信至您填写的信箱地址