题名

組織公民行為之跨層次分析:層級線性模式的應用

并列篇名

A Cross-Level Examination of Organizational Citizenship Behavior: An Analysis Using Hierarchical Linear Modeling (HLM)

DOI

10.6504/JOM.2005.22.04.06

作者

林鉦棽(Cheng-Chen Lin)

关键词

組織公民行為 ; 多層次研究 ; 層級線性模式 ; Organizational Citizenship Behavior ; Multilevel Research ; HLM

期刊名称

管理學報

卷期/出版年月

22卷4期(2005 / 08 / 01)

页次

503 - 524

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

基於跨層次或多層次的研究觀點逐漸爲組織行爲及人力資源管理研究者重視,本研究以個體層次之組織公正與群體層次的凝聚力爲自變數,探討二者對組織公民行爲的影響。爲避免共同方法變異的問題,本研究透過對51家中小企業管理部門之主管、同事與員工三方面的調查,使用層級線性模式分析變數之間的關係。結果顯示正式程序公正與互動公正對組織公民行爲有顯著的影響效果,而凝聚力則在組織公正變數與組織公民行爲之間扮演著調節的角色。針對上述結果,本研究提出相關的討論與建議。

英文摘要

Based on the importance to the effectiveness of organizations, in recent three decades, organizational citizenship behaviors (OCBs) and related constructs have received much attention from organizational behavior and human resource management researchers. Traditional OCBs scholars took the research design at the individual level to investigate the antecedents of OCBs, however, the effects of group level constructs on outcome variables were neglected by researchers. In order to connect the gap between theoretical claims and empirical strategies, the purpose of present study is to investigate the relationships among organizational justice, group cohesiveness, and organizational citizenship behaviors. There were three ways to examine the above relationships. Firstly, the main effects of distributive justice, formal procedural justice, and interactional justice on OCBs, citizenship behaviors toward individuals (OCBI) and an organization (OCBO), were investigated both at the individual level. Secondly, the main effects of group cohesiveness at group level on OCBs at the individual level also observed in this study. At last, the moderating effects of group cohesiveness on the relationship between perception of organizational justice and OCBs were analyzed under cross-level framework. Through reviewing the related literatures, three hypotheses were developed by the present study. There were the main effects of organizational justice on OCBs both at the individual level, the main effect of group cohesiveness at the group level on OCBs at the individual level, and the moderating effect of group cohesiveness at the group level on OCBs at the individual level. In the part of research design, to avoiding the problems of common method variances, the present study collected data from supervisors, coworkers, and employees of administration departments in the setting of small-median business. Total 507 employees within 51 work units participated this investigation. Employees rated the perception of organizational justice and group cohesiveness. The coworker evaluated OCBI of the focal employee, and OCBO rated by immediate supervisor. After the coding process, we aggregated the evaluation of group cohesiveness from the individual level into the climate of group cohesiveness under the criterion of inter-rater agreement (r(subscript wg)>.70). Using HLM software, for hypothesis 1, the results indicated there were significant and positive main effects of formal procedural justice and interactional justice on OCBO and OCBI, and not significant effects of distributive justice on two dimensions of OCBs was found. Beside, the influence of interactional justice on OCBs is the highest among three dimensions of organizational justice. What is surprise to me is hypothesis 2 was not supported based on my empirical result. There was not cross-level directed effect of group cohesiveness upon OCBs. However, regarding to hypothesis 3, the cross-level moderating effects of cohesion on the relationship between organizational justice and OCBs were supported. In details, I found the moderating effects of group cohesiveness existed within the relationships between distributive justice and OCBI, interactional justice and OCBI, and interactional justice and OCBO. Based on the empirical results of the present study, I discussed some implications and suggestions generated from the present investigation. Firstly, compared to the results of the present study to the conclusion of Kidwell et al. (1997), the present study extended the academic viewpoint beyond the concern by Kidwell and his colleagues. I discussed the implications generated from these two similar studies. Secondly, for the contribution of the present study to OCBs theory, the present effort extended the research scope at different analysis levels. In theoretic thinking, the formation process of work behaviors of employees in an organization is a multilevel-oriented in nature. However, the empirical strategy was not matched with the essence of this claim in the past academic efforts. The present study may be one of the attempts to bridge with theoretic claims and empirical design. Following the conclusions of this study, the moderating effect of different group level variables should be taken into consideration in the research design, such as organizational climate and culture, for example. For the sampling strategy is concerned, the traditional OCBs studies usually take the supervisor-rating method as the main source of data-collection. However, based on the possible problems inhere in supervisor-rating method, the present study used coworker as the alternative of OCBs rating besides the traditional collecting strategy in order to understand the mechanism of OCBs formation process. The results under this measurement consider would have more confidence before we accept any empirical conclusion. Thirdly, respected to managerial practices, I suggest the managers may take more attention on the group level variables. If the managers put their emphasis on individual causes and neglect the importance of other level constructs, the expected effectiveness would not ensure. At last, some limitation should be noticed. The generalization of the present conclusion ought to be confirmed because of single setting in the present study. I suggest future study may take other group level constructs and different research setting in order to understand the formation of OCBs more deeply and clearly.

主题分类 社會科學 > 管理學
参考文献
  1. Adams, J. S.(1965).Advances in experimental social psychology.New York:Academic Press.
  2. Ambrose, M. L.,Schminke, M.(2003).Organization structure as a moderator of the relationship between procedural justice, interactional justice, perceived organizational support, and supervisory trust.Journal of Applied Psychology,88,295-305.
  3. Armstrong-Stassen, M.(2004).Managers` Perceptions of Their Work Group and Their Own Performance and Well-being Following a Job Transfer.Public Personnel Management,33,47-60.
  4. Ashkanasy, N. M.,Wilderom, C. P. M.,Peterson, M. F.(2000).Handbook of organizational culture and climate.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage Publications, Inc..
  5. Bateman, T. S.,Organ, D. W.(1983).Job satisfaction and the good soldier: The relationship between affect and employee “citizenship.”.Academy of Management Journal,26,587-595.
  6. Bies, R. J.(1986).Moving beyond equity theory: New directions in research on justice in organizations.Chicago, IL:Symposium conducted at the meeting of the Academy of Management.
  7. Bies, R. J.,Moag, J. S.(1986).Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness.Research on Negotiation in Organizations,1,43-55.
  8. Blau, P. M.(1964).Exchange and power in social life.New York:John Wiley & Sons.
  9. Bliese, P. D.(2000).Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations.San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
  10. Brief, A. P.,Motowidlo, S. J.(1986).Prosocial organizational behaviors.Academy of Management Review,11,710-725.
  11. Bryk, A. S.,Raudenbush, S. W.(1992).Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods.Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
  12. Cappelli, P.,St Sherer, P. D.(1991).Research in organizational behavior.Greenwich, CT:JAI.
  13. Carron, A. V.,Spink, K. S.(1995).The group size-cohesion relationship in minimal groups.Small Group Research,26,86-105.
  14. Cattell, R. B.(1948).Concepts and methods in the measurement of group syntality.Psychological Review,55,48-63.
  15. Cohen, J.,Cohen, P.(1983).Applied multiple regression correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences.Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.
  16. Coleman, V. I.,Borman, W. C.(2000).Investigating the underlying structure of the citizenship performance domain.Human Resource Management,10,25-44.
  17. Colquitt, J. A.(2004).Does the Justice of the One Interact With the Justice of the Many? Reactions to Procedural Justice in Teams.Journal of Applied Psychology,89(4),633-646.
  18. Colquitt, J. A,Conlon, D. E,Wesson, M. J,Porter, C.,Ng, K. Y.(2001).Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research.Journal of Applied Psychology,86,425-445.
  19. Dobbins, G. H.,Zaccaro, S. J.(1986).The effects of group cohesion and leader behavior on subordinate satisfaction.Group and Organization Studies,11,203-219.
  20. Ehrhart, M. G.(1994).Leadership and procedural justice climate as antecedents of unit-level organizational citizenship behavior.Personnel Psychology,57,61-95.
  21. Eisenberger, R.,Huntington, R.,Hutchison, S.,Sowa, D.(1986).Perceived organizational support.Journal of Applied Psychology,71,500-507.
  22. Farh, J.,Podsakoff, P. M.,Organ, D. W.(1990).Accounting for organizational citizenship behavior: Leader fairness and task scope versus satisfaction.Journal of Management,16,705-721.
  23. Gavin, M. B.,Hofmann, D. A.(2002).Using hierarchical linear modeling to investigate the moderating influence of leadership climate.Leadership Quarterly,13,15-33.
  24. George, J. M.,Bettenhausen, K.(1990).Understanding prosocial behavior, sales performance, and turnover: A group-level analysis in a service context.Journal of Applied Psychology,75,698-709.
  25. Glission, C.,James, L. R.(2002).The cross-level effects of culture and climate in human service teams.Journal of Organizational Behavior,23,767-794.
  26. Graham, J. W.(1991).An essay on organizational citizenship behavior.Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal,4,249-270.
  27. Greenberg, J.(1990).Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow.Journal of Management,16,399-432.
  28. Hackman, J. R.(2003).Learning more by crosslevel: Evidence from airplanes, hospitals, and orchestras.Journal of Organizational Behavior,24,905-922.
  29. Haworth, C.L.,Levy, P. E.(2001).The importance of instrumentality beliefs in the prediction of organizational citizenship behaviors.Journal of Vocational behavior,59,64-75.
  30. Hofmann, D. A.(1997).An overview of the logic and rationale of hierarchical linear models.Journal of Management,23,723-744.
  31. Hofmann, D. A.,Gavin, M. B.(1998).Centering decisions in hierarchical linear models: Implications for research in organizations.Journal of Management,24,623-641.
  32. House, R.,Rousseau, D. M.,Thomas-Hunt, M.(1995).Research in organizational behavior.Greenwich, CT:JAT.
  33. Isen, A. M.,Baron, R. A.(1991).Positive affect as a factor in organizational behavior.Research in Organizational Behavior,13,1-53.
  34. James, L. A.,James, L. R.(1989).Integrating work environment perceptions: Explorations into the measurement of meaning.Journal of Applied Psychology,74,739-751.
  35. James, L. R.,Demaree, R. G.,Mulaik, S. A.,Ladd, R T.(1992).Validity generalization in the context of situational models.Journal of Applied Psychology,77,3-14.
  36. James, L. R.,Demaree, R. G.,Wolf G.(1993).rwg: an assessment of within-group rater agreement.Journal of Applied Psychology,78,306-309.
  37. James, L. R.,Jones, A. P.(1974).Organizational climate: A review of theory and research.Psychological Bulletin,81,1096-1112.
  38. Jones, A. P.,James, L. R.(1979).Psychological climate: dimensions and relationships of individual and aggregated work environment perceptions.Organizational Behavior and Human Performance,23,201-250.
  39. Katz, D.,Kahn, R.(1966).The social psychology of organizations.New York:Wiley.
  40. Kidwell, R. E.,Jr., Mossholder, K. W.,Bennett, N.(1997).Cohesiveness and organizational citizenship behavior: A multilevel analysis using work groups and individuals.Journal of Management,23,775-793.
  41. Klein, K. J.,Dansereau, F.,Hall, R. J.(1994).Levels issues in theory development, data collection, and analysis.Academy of Management Journal,19,195-229.
  42. Klein, K. J.,Kozlowski, S. W. J.(2000).Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions.San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
  43. Klein, K. J.,Kozlowski, S. W. J.(2000).From micro to meso: Critical steps in conceptualizing and conducting multilevel research.Organizational Research Methods,3(3),211-236.
  44. Konovsky, M. A.(2000).Understanding procedural justice and its impact on business organizations.Journal of Management,26,489-511.
  45. Konovsky, M. A.,Pugh, D. S.(1994).Citizenship behavior and social exchange.Academy of Management Journal,37,656-669.
  46. Korsgaard, M. A.,Roberson, L.,Rymph, R. D.(1998).What motivates fairness? The role of subordinate assertive behavior on managers` interactional fairness.Journal of Applied Psychology,83,731-744.
  47. Lee, K.,Allen, N. J.(2002).Organizational citizenship behavior and workplace deviance: The role of affect and cognitions.Journal of Applied Psychology,87,131-142.
  48. LePine, J. A.,Erez, A.,Johnson, D. E.(2002).The nature and dimensionality of organizational citizenship behavior: A critical review and meta-analysis.Journal of Applied Psychology,87,52-65.
  49. Liden, R. C.,Wayne, S. J.,Jaworski, R. A.,Bennett, N.(2004).Social loafing: A field investigation.Journal of Management,30,285-304.
  50. Lin, C. C.(1999).The study on the relationship among organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors: The examination of different theoretical model.Sun Yat-sen Management Review,7(4),1049-1073.
  51. Lin, C. C.(1996).The relationship among organizational justice, trust, and organizational citizenship behaviors: The Viewpoint from social exchange theory.Journal of Management Science,13(3),391-416.
  52. Lin, S.,Farh, J.,Wu, J.,Seetoo, D.(1994).The effects of distributive and procedural justice on organizational commitment and organizational citizenship behavior.Management Review,12(2),87-108.
  53. Marquis, D. G.,Guetzkow, H.,Heyns, R. W.,Guetzkow, H.(1951).Groups, leadership, and men.Pittsburgh, PA:Carnegie Press.
  54. McNeely, B. L.,Meglino, B. M.(1994).The role of dispositional and situational antecedents in prosocial organizational behavior: An examination of the intended beneficiaries of prosocial behavior.Journal of Applied Psychology,79,836-844.
  55. Moorman, R. H.(1991).Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship?.Journal of Applied Psychology,76,845-855.
  56. Morrison, E. W.(1994).Role definitions and organizational citizenship behavior: The importance of the employee`s perspective.Academy of Management Journal,37,1543-1567.
  57. Netemeyer, R. G.,Boles, J. S.,McKee, D. O.,McMurrian, R.(1997).An investigation into the antecedents of organizational citizenship behaviors in a personal selling context.Journal of Marketing,61,85-99.
  58. Niehoff, B.P.,Moorman, R. H.(1993).Justice as a mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and organizational citizenship behavior.Academy of Management Journal,36,527-556.
  59. Organ, D. W.(1988).A restatement of the satisfaction-performance.Hypothesis Journal of Management,14,547-557.
  60. Organ, D. W.(1990).Research in organizational behavior.Greenwich, CT:JAI Press.
  61. Organ, D. W.,,Konovsky, M. A.(1989).Cognitive versus affective determinants of organizational citizenship behavior.Journal of Applied Psychology,74,157-164.
  62. Organ, D. W.,Near, J. P.(1985).Cognition vs affect in measures of job satisfaction. International.Journal of Psychology,20,241-253.
  63. Organ, D. W.,Ryan, K.(1995).A meta analytic review of attitudinal and dispositional predictors of organizational citizenship behavior.Personnel Psychology,48,775-802.
  64. Ostroff, C.(1992).The relationship between satisfaction, attitudes, and performance: An organizational level analysis.Journal of Applied Psychology,77,963.
  65. Ostroff, C.(1993).Comparing correlations based on individual level and aggregate data.Journal of Applied Psychology,78,569-582.
  66. Podsakoff, P. M.,Ahearne, M.,MacKenzie, S. B.(1997).Organizational citizenship behavior and the quantity and quality of work group performance.Journal of Applied Psychology,82,262-270.
  67. Podsakoff, P. M.,MacKenzie, S. B.(1997).The impact of organizational citizenship behavior on organizational performance: A review and suggestions for future research.Human Performance,10,133-152.
  68. Podsakoff, P. M.,MacKenzie, S. B.,Moorman, R. H.,Fetter, R.(1990).Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers` trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors.Leadership Quarterly,1,107-142.
  69. Podsakoff, P. M.,MacKenzie, S. B.,Paine, J. B.,Bachrach, D. G.(2000).Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future study.Journal of Management,26,513-563.
  70. Puffer, S.(1987).Prosocial behavior, noncompliant behavior, and work performance among commission salespeople.Journal of Applied Psychology,72,615-621.
  71. Rentsch, J. R.(1990).Climate and culture: Interaction and qualitative differences in organizational meanings.Journal of Applied Psychology,75,668-681.
  72. Robinson, W.S.(1950).Ecological correlations and the behavior of individuals.American Sociological Review,15,351-357.
  73. Rupp, D. E.,Cropanzano, R.(2002).The mediating effects of social exchange relationships in predicting workplace outcomes from mnltifoci organizational justice.Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Decision Processes,89,925-946.
  74. Schnake, M.,Cochran, D. S.,Dumler, M. P.(1995).Encouraging organizational citizenship: The effects of job satisfaction, perceived equity, and leadership.Journal of Managerial Issues,2,209-221.
  75. Schnake, M.,Dumler, M. P.,Cochran, D. S.(1993).The relationship between “traditional” leadership, “super” leadership, and organizational citizenship behavior.Group and Organization Management,18,352-365.
  76. Schneider, B.(1990).Organizational climate and culture.San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
  77. Schneider, B.(1987).The people make the place.Personnel Psychology,40,437-453.
  78. Shaw, M. E.(1981).Group dynamics: The psychology of small group behavior.New York:McGraw-Hill.
  79. Shore, L. M.,Shore, T. H.(1995).Organizational Politics, Justice, and Support.Quorum Books:Westport, CT.
  80. Skarlicki, D. P.,Latham, G. P.(1997).Leadership training in organizational justice to increase organizational citizenship behavior within a labor union: A replication.Personnel Psychology,50,617-633.
  81. Skarlicki, D. P.,Latham, G. P.(1996).Increasing organizational citizenship behavior within a labor union: A test of organizational justice theory.Journal of Applied Psychology,81,161-169.
  82. Smith, C. A.,Organ, D. W.,Near, J. P.(1983).Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents.Journal of Applied Psychology,68,653-663.
  83. Thompson, J.(1967).Organizations in action.New York:McGraw-Hill.
  84. Thorndike, E. L.(1939).On the fallacy of imputing the correlations found for groups to the individuals or smaller groups composing them.American Journal of Sociology,52,122-124.
  85. Tsui, A. S.(1994).Research in organizational behavior.Greenwich, CT:JAI Press.
  86. Tyler, T. R.,Lind, E. A.(1992).Advances in experimental social psychology.San Diego, CA:Academic Press.
  87. Van Dyne, L.,Cummings, L. L.,Parks, J. M.(1995).Research in Organizational Behavior.Greenwich, CT:JAI.
  88. Van Scotter, J. R.,Motowidlo, S. J.(1996).Interpersonal facilitation and job dedication as separate facets of contextual performance.Journal of Applied Psychology,81,525-531.
  89. Vancouver, J. B.,Millsap, R. E.,Peters, P. A.(1994).Multilevel analysis of organizational goal congruence.Journal of Applied Psychology,79,666-679.
  90. Widmeyer, N.,Brawley, L.,Carron, A.(1992).Group dynamics in sport.Advances in sports psychology,124-139.
  91. Williams, L. J.,Anderson, S. E.(1991).Job satisfaction and organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors.Journal of Management,17,601-617.
  92. Williams, S.,Pitre, R.,Zainuba, M.(2002).Justice and organizational citizenship behavior intentions: Fair rewards versus fair treatment.Journal of Social Psychology,142,33-44.
被引用次数
  1. Weng, Liang-Chieh,Lai, Yi-Chu(2012).Examining the Effects of Dual-level Transformational Leadership, LMX, and Group Cohesiveness on Employee Service Performance.交大管理學報,32(1),163-195.
  2. 蔡維奇、紀乃文(2008)。團隊情感氛圍形成的前因、情境調節及個人層次後果變項之研究。組織與管理,1(1),1-37。
  3. 曹勝雄,張金明(2021)。以跨層級分析探討智慧領團App對帶團的影響。觀光休閒學報,27(2),137-165。
  4. 曾明基、張德勝(2010)。超額教師在學校新環境適應困擾的影響因素:階層線性模式分析。臺北市立教育大學學報:教育類,41(2),1-28。
  5. 陳俊瑋(2010)。國中教師集體效能感、教師自我效能感及教師組織公民行爲關聯之研究:多層次中介效果之分析。當代教育研究,18(2),29-69。
  6. 陳密桃、李新民(2007)。組織公民行為的因素結構與影響因素:巢狀因素結構與階層線性模式的分析。高雄師大學報:教育與社會科學類,22,69-91。
  7. 陳彥君、許含笑(2013)。提升工作團體認同:探討轉換型領導與部屬性格之角色。人力資源管理學報,13(2),73-100。
  8. 黃銘章、康照宗、洪嘉謙(2012)。供應鏈整合程度對供應商績效的跨層次影響效果。管理與系統,19(1),53-77。
  9. 黃銘章、李萍萍(2012)。內部行銷、外部行銷對互動行銷與顧客滿意度間關係干擾效果之研究: 多層次分析模型。中山管理評論,20(2),637-672。
  10. 黃欣怡、彭台光、許含笑、林鉦棽(2015)。好員工,你累了嗎?從資源保存觀點探討不同本質角色外行為及調節焦點特質對情緒耗竭之影響。組織與管理,8(1),41-76。
  11. 黃秀卿(2018)。應用日誌法探究餐飲業顧客無禮行為對服務人員情緒耗竭之影響:跨層次分析。觀光休閒學報,24(1),1-38。
  12. 賴賢哲,黃靖文(2019)。顧客如何利用網路社群互動促進行為意願:從品牌認同到共同創新。科技管理學刊,24(1),31-55。
  13. 廖良文、黃同圳(2009)。高績效工作系統與人事專業員工作績效關連性之研究—組織創新之跨層次中介效果。人力資源管理學報,9(4),17-42。
  14. 廖良文、林文政(2011)。高績效工作系統於轉換型領導與員工工作績效間之角色-跨層級調節效果之觀點。東吳經濟商學學報,73,29-66。
  15. 廖珮妏、余鑑、于俊傑(2012)。應用整合型科技接受模式與創新擴散通用模型於企業導入數位學習之多層次分析。電子商務學報,14(4),657-688。
  16. 劉桂苓、湯大緯、林尚平、沈渼君(2011)。服務導向與支持氣候對銷售績效之影響:情緒勞務與適應性銷售行為的中介效果。中山管理評論,19(1),179-206。
  17. 盧建中、廖良文、林文政(2018)。組織贊助性人才管理措施與職涯成功關聯性之研究:領導潛能跨層次中介效果。人力資源管理學報,18(1),129-154。
  18. 盧秀琴,莊淑芬(2021)。學生及學校因素對合作式問題解決表現之多層級分析。測驗學刊,68(3),175-207。
  19. 羅新興、梁成明(2014)。團隊成員的獎懲經驗對集體獎懲系統正義知覺之影響—探討預先告知與集體責任共識的跨層次調節效果。管理與系統,21(3),393-420。
  20. 蘇聖珠、婁文信、李政達、王如鈺(2012)。顧客滿意與其前置變項之多層次分析。顧客滿意學刊,8(2),145-182。
  21. 王郁琮(2011)。階層線性模式路徑圖與策略化模型建構機制。教育研究與發展期刊,7(4),25-56。
  22. 蕭佳純、胡夢鯨(2007)。影響成人教育工作者知識管理能力因素之跨層次分析。教育學刊,29,1-36。
  23. 蕭佳純、涂志賢(2012)。教師創意教學衡量中共同方法變異問題之探討。測驗學刊,59(4),609-639。
  24. 謝琦強、黃文雄、連啟伶、林永森(2016)。解說志工休閒涉入預測分析之跨層次研究。戶外遊憩研究,29(4),37-65。
  25. 張婉菁、邱雅暖(2018)。真誠領導與服務導向組織公民行為之關係:結構方程模式分析。人力資源管理學報,18(2),99-130。
  26. (2007)。組織公民行為的因素結構與影響因素:巢狀因素結構與階層線性模式的分析。高雄師大學報,22(2),69-91。
  27. (2009)。國民中學教師彰權益能、學校組織健康與學校效能關係之研究。教育與心理研究,32(1),1-28。
  28. (2012)。多元智能、父母管教方式對自我概念影響之階層線性模式分析─新移民子女與本籍生之比較。教育研究學報,46(1),69-96。
  29. (2017)。國民中學教師組織公民行為前置因素的再檢視。教育政策論壇,20(2),113-149。
  30. (2017)。國中教師組織公民行為之多構面構念類型界定。教育與心理研究,40(3),37-68。