题名

團隊成員人格特質對知識分享及創新績效之影響-個人與團隊層次的分析

并列篇名

The Effects of Team Personality Composition on Knowledge Sharing and Innovation Performance: Individual and Team Level Analysis

DOI

10.6504/JOM.2006.23.02.01

作者

黃家齊(Jia-Chi Huang);許雅婷(Ya-Ting Hsu)

关键词

五大人格特質 ; 團隊組合 ; 知識分享 ; 創新績效 ; 多層次研究 ; Big Five ; personality ; team composition ; knowledge sharing ; innovation performance ; multilevel research

期刊名称

管理學報

卷期/出版年月

23卷2期(2006 / 04 / 01)

页次

149 - 170

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本研究採用五大人格特質作為人格分類架構,探討團隊成員個人人格特質以及團隊人格特質組合對於團隊可能造成的影響。在個人層次探討人格與知識分享意願的關聯性;在團隊層次則探討團隊人格特質組合對團隊知識分享行為及創新績效的影響。以研發團隊作為實證對象,蒐集63個研發團隊,以層級迴歸分析結果顯示,人格特質確實會影響個人知識分享的意願,在各人格特質構面中,宜人性是對於知識分享有最為顯著正面影響的構面。在團隊人格特質組合方面,發現當團隊神經質較低時,有助於團隊知識分享行為;團隊經驗開放性對於團知識分享行為亦有正向影響;團隊宜人性對團隊知識分享行為則有微弱正向影響,但對創新績效略有負向影響,團隊宜人性變異程度對於團隊知識分享行為亦有微弱正向影響。

英文摘要

Many scholars have already accepted the concept of organizations as knowledge systems. How to transfer and create know/edge system has become an important issue, but most researches focus on knowledge transfer between units or organizations. There is few researchs focused on the knowledge sharing and knowledge creation in teams. So the knowledge sharing, knowledge creation and innovation performance in teams is an important issue needed to be explored. Team composition affects team process and performance. Knowledge-sharing and innovation performance are also possibly affected by team composition. Most of team composition researches focused on the visible variable characteristics, such as demographic variable, but the implicit personality variables were ignored (Milliken & Martin, 1996; Williams & O'Reilly, 1998). Actually, the relationship of personality and creativity is an important direction in creativity research. But the existed experimental research seems to be not enough to clarify the relationship of personality and innovation. This relationship is not well understood especially when it occurred in team context. So the purpose of this study is to understand how individual personality and team personality composition will affect knowledge sharing and innovation performance in teams. Based on ”Big Five”, we constructed a multilevel model. On individual level, we explored how team member personality affects willingness of knowledge sharing. On team level, we explored the effect of team personality composition, average level and variability, on team knowledge sharing behavior and innovation performance. We clollected 339 team member and 63 supervisor data from 63 R&D teams and use hierarchical regression analysis to test our hypothesis. On individual level, we found personality affect willingness of knowledge sharing. Among five dimensions of personality agreeableness has most significant positive effect on the willingness of knowledge sharing. On team level, we found the lower average level of team neuroticism, the more team knowledge sharing behavior facilitated. The average level of team openness to experience has positive relationship with team knowledge sharing behavior. The team agreeableness has marginal significant positive effect on team knowledge sharing behavior but has marginal negative effect on innovation performance. The van ability of agreeableness also has marginally significant effect on team knowledge sharing behavior. The results reveal individual team member personality and team personality composition have different effect on knowledge sharing and innovation performance. These results also reveal the possible contribution of multilevel research.

主题分类 社會科學 > 管理學
参考文献
  1. Huang, J. C.,Tsai, D. R.(2003).Diversity and Knowledge Sharing, Knowledge Creation and Innovation Performance in Teams.NTU Management Review.
    連結:
  2. Shen, C. T.,Huang M. P.,Cheng B. S.(2004).The Effect of Shared Mental Madel on Knowledge Sharing Behavior: Investigating the Moderating Effects of Team Members.Journal of Management.
    連結:
  3. Aguilar, A. A.(1996).Personality and Creativity.Personality and Individual Differences.
  4. Allport. G. W.(1961).Pattern and Growth in Personality.
  5. Amason, A.(1996).Distinguishing the Effects of Functional and Dysfunctional Conflict on Strategic Decision Making: Resolving a Paradox for Top Management Teams.Academy of Management Journal.
  6. Ardichvili, A.,Page, V.,Wentling, T.(2003).Motivation and Barriers to Participation in Virtual Knowledge-sharing Communities of Practice.Journal of Knowledge Management.
  7. Aronoff, J.,Wilson, J. P.(1985).Personality in the Social Process.
  8. Barrick, M. R.,Mount, M. K.(1991).The Big Five Personality Dimensions and Job Performance: A Meta-analysis.Personnel Psychology.
  9. Barrick, M. R.,Stewart, G.. L.,Neubert, M. J.,Mount, M. K.(1998).Relating Member Ability and Personality to Work-team Processes and Team Effectiveness.Journal of Applied Psychology.
  10. Barry, B,Stewart, G. L.(1997).Composition, Process, and Performance in Self-managed Groups: The Role of Personality.Journal of Applied Psychology.
  11. Barsade, S. G.,Ward, A. J.,Turner, J. D. F.,Sonnenfeld. J. A.(2000).To Your Heart`s Content: A Model of Affective Diversity of Affective Diversity in Top Management Teams.Administrative Science Quarterly.
  12. Boisot, M.(1995).Information Space: A Framework for Learning in Organizations, Institutions and Culture.
  13. Borgatta, E.(1964).The Structure of Personality Characteristics.Behavioral Science.
  14. Brewer, M. B.,Kramer. R. M.(1986).Choice Behavior in Social Dillemma: Effects of Social Identity, Group Size, and Decision Framing.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
  15. Colbert, A. E.,Mount, M. K.,Harter, J. K.,Witt. L. A.,Barrick, M. R.(2004).Interactive Effects of Personality and Perceptions of the Situation on Workplace Deviance.Journal of Applied Psychology.
  16. Costa, P. T. Jr.,McCrae, R. R.(1989).The NEO-PI7NEO-EFI Manual Supplement.Odessa, FL:Psychological Assessment Resources.
  17. Costa, P. T. Jr.,McCrae, R. R.(1985).The NEO Personality Inventory: Manual Form S and Form R.Odessa, FL:Psychological Assessment Resources.
  18. Costa, P. T. Jr.,McCrae, R. R.(1992).Revised NEO Personality Inventory and New Five-Factor Inventory: Professional Manual.
  19. Davenport, T. H.,Prusak, L.(1998).Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know.Boston, MA:Harvard Business School Press.
  20. Digman, J. M.(1990).Personality Structure: Emergence of the Five-Factor Model.Annual Review of Psychology.
  21. Digman, J. M.,Inouye, J.(1986).Further Specification of the Five Robust Factors of Personality.Annual Review of Psychology.
  22. Driskell, J. E.,Hogan, R.,Salsa, E.(1987).Personality and Group Performance.Journal of Personal social Psychology.
  23. Dyer, J. H.,Nobeoka, K.(2000).Creating and Managing a High-performance Knowledge-sharing Network: The Toyata Case.Strategic Management Journal,21,345-367.
  24. Eysenck, H. J.(1994).Creativity and Personality: Word Association, Origence, and Psychoticism.Creativity Research Journal.
  25. Fiske. D. W.(1949).Consistency of the Factorial Structures of Personality Rating from Different Sources.Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology.
  26. Gelade. G. A.(1997).Creativity in Conflict: The Personality of tile Commercial Creative.The Journal of Genetic Psychology,158,67-78.
  27. George. J.(1990).Personality. Affect, and Behavior in Groups.Journal of Applied Psychology.
  28. Gist, M. E.,Mitchell, T. R.(1992).Self-efficacy: A Theoretical Analysis of its Determinants and Malleability.Academy of Management Review.
  29. Goldberg, L. R.(1992).The Development of Markers of the Big Five Factor Structure.Psychological Assessment.
  30. Guo, Y. Y.(1994).Creative Psychology.
  31. Gupta, A. K.,Govindarajan, V.(2000).Knowledge Flows within Multinational Corporations.Strategic Management Journal,21,473-496.
  32. Helmreich, R. L.(1984).Cockpit Management Attitude.Human Factors.
  33. Hendriks, P.(1999).Why Shared Knowledge? The Influence of ICT on the Motivation for Knowledge Sharing.Knowledge and Process Management.
  34. Hogan, R.(1991).Personality and Personality Assessment.Handbook of Industrical and Organizational Psychology.
  35. Hogan, R.,Curphy, G. J.,Hogan, J.(1994).What We Know about Leadership: Effectiveness and Personality.American Psychologist.
  36. Hogan, R.,Hogan, J.(1995).The Hogan Personality Inventory Manual.
  37. Hoopes, D. G.,Postrel. S.(1999).Shared Knowledge, “Glitches,” and Product Development Performance.Strategic Management Journal,20,837-865.
  38. Hough, L. M.,Eaton. N. K.,Dunnette, M. D.,Kamp, J. D.,McCloy, R. A.(1990).Criterion-related Validities of Personality Constructs and the Effect of Response Distortion on those Validities.Journal of applied psychology.
  39. Huang, J. C.(2003).Team Diversity and Knowledge Sharing and Innovation Performance: The Mediating Effect of Social Capital.Journal of Management & Systems.
  40. Huang, J. C.,Wang S. F.(2002).Knowledge Conversion Abilities and Knowledge Creation and Innovation: A New Perspective on Team Composition.Proceedings of the Third European Conference on Organizational Knowledge, Learning and Capabilities.
  41. Huang. J. C.(2002).Organizational Justice and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Mediating Effect of Cognition- and Affect-based Trust.NTU Management Review.
  42. Huang. J. M.,Shen. T. Y.(2003).Validity of tile Five-Factor Model of Personality in Predicting Sales Performance: Inspection and Application of–the NEO-PI-R.Journal of Management.
  43. James, L. R.,Demaree, R. G.,Wolf, G.(1993).rwg: An Assessment of Within-group Interrater Agreement.Journal of Applied Psychology.
  44. Jehn, K. A.,Northcraft, G B.,Neale M. A.(1999).Why Difference make a Difference: A Field Study of Diversity, Conflict, and Performance in Workgroup.Administrative Science Quarterly.
  45. Jehn, K. A.,Shah, A.,Pradhan, P.(1997).Interpersonal Relationship and Task Performance: An Examination of Mediating Processes in Friendship and Acquaintance Groups.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
  46. Kichuk, S. L.,Wiesner, W. H.(1997).The Big Five Personality Factors and Team Performance: Implications for Selecting Successful Product Design Teams.Journal of Engineering and Technology Management.
  47. Kilmann, R. H.,Thomas, K. W.(1975).Interpersonal Conflict Handing Behavior as Reflections of Jungian Personality Dimensions.Psychological Report.
  48. Klein, K. J.,Dansereau, F.,Hall, R. J.(1994).Levels Issues in Theory Development, Data Collection, and Analysis.Academy of Management Review.
  49. Klimoski, R.,Mohammed, S.(1994).Team Mental Model: Construct or Metaphor?.Journal of Management.
  50. Leonard-Barton, D.(1995).Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Sources of Innovation.Boston, MA:Harvard Business School Press.
  51. LePine, J. A.,Hollenbeck, J. R.,Ilgen, D.R.,Hedlund, J.(1997).Effects of Individual Differences on the Performance of Hierarchical Decision-making Teams: Much more than G.Journal of Applied Psychology.
  52. LePine, J. A.,Van Dyne, L.(2001).Voice and Cooperative Behavior as Contrasting Forms of Contextual Performance: Evidence of Differential Relatioiships with Big. Five Personality Characteristics and Cognitive Ability.Journal of Applied Psychology.
  53. Lin, N. P.,Chiu, H. C.(1999).A Study of Service Quality--The Effects and Applications of Service Providers` Personality Traits.Journal of Management.
  54. Littlepage, G. E.,Schmidt, G. W.,Whisler, E. W.,Frost, A. G(1995).An Input-process-output Analysis of Influence and Performance in Problem-solving Groups.ournal of personality and social psychology.
  55. Lovelace, K.,Shapiro. D. L.,Weingart, L. R.(2001).Maximizing Cross-functional New Product Teams` Innovativeness and Constraint Adherence: A Conflict Communications Perspective.Academy of Management Journal.
  56. Mann, R. D.(1959).A Review of the Relationship between Personality and Performance in Small Groups.Psychology Bulletin.
  57. Mazur, A.(1973).Cross-species Comparison of Status in Established Smell Groups.American Sociological Review.
  58. McCrae, R. R(1987).Creativity. Divergent Thinking, and Openness to Experience.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
  59. McCrae, R. R.,Costa, P. T. Jr.(1989).The Structure of Interpersonal Traits: Wiggin`s Circumplex and the Five-factor Model.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology.
  60. Mcleod, P. L.,S. A. Lobel(1992).The Effects of Ethic Diversity in Idea Generation in Small Group.Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings.
  61. Milliken, F. J.,Martins, L. L.(1996).Searching for Common Threads: Understanding the Multiple Effects of Diversity in Organizational Groups.Academy of Management Review.
  62. Mount, M. K.,Barrick, M. R.,Stewart, G. L.(1998).Five-factor Model of Personality and Performance in Jobs Involving Interpersonal Interactions.Human Performance.
  63. Nahapiet, J.,Ghoshal, S.(1998).Social Capital, Intellectual Capital and the Organizational Advantage.Academy of Management Review.
  64. Neuman, G A.,Wright, J.(1999).Team Effectiveness: Beyond Skills and Cognitive Ability.Journal of Applied Psychology.
  65. Neuman, G. A.,Wagner, S. H.,Christiansen, N. D.(1999).The Relationship between Work-team Personality Composition and the Job Performance of Teams.Group & Organization Management.
  66. Nonaka, I.,Takeuchi, H.(1995).The Knowledge creating Company.New York:Oxford University Press.
  67. Norman, W. T.(1963).Toward an Adequate Taxonomy of Personality Attributes: Replicated Factor Structure in Peer Nomination Personality Ratings.Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology.
  68. Ostroff. C.(1993).Comparing Correlations Based on Individual-level and Aggregated Data.Journal of Applied Psychology.
  69. Putnam. R.(1995).Bowling Alone: America`s Declining Social Capital.Journal of Democracy.
  70. Raudsepp, E. V.(1983).How to Create New Idea.
  71. Reilly, R. P.,Lynn. G S.,Aronson, Z. H.(2002).The Role of Personality in New Product Development Team Performance.Journal of Engineering and Technology Management.
  72. Rousseau, D. M.,L. L. Cummings,B. M. Staw(1985).Issues of Level in Organizational Research.Research in Organizational Behavior.
  73. Saucier, G.(1994).Mini-Markers: A Brief Version of Goldberg Unipolar Big-5 Markers.Journal of Personality Assessment.
  74. Schneider, F. W.,Delaney, J. G.(1972).Effects of Individual Achievement Motivation on Group Problem-solving Efficiency.Journal of Social Psychology.
  75. Steiner, I. D.(1972).Group Process and Productivity.
  76. Stewart, U L.,M. R. Barrick,A. M. Ryan(2003).Toward an Understanding of the Multilevel Role of Personality in Teams.Peronality and Work: Recosidering the role of personality in organizations.
  77. Szulanski. G.(1996).Exploring Internal Stickiness: Impediments to the Transfer of Best Practice within the Firm.Strategic Management Journal,17,27-43.
  78. Tang, L. Y.(2000).The Study of Knowledge Network, National Chengchi University unpublished master dissertation.
  79. Tett, R. P.,Jackson. D. N.,Rothstein, M.(1991).Personality Measures as Predictors of Job Performance: A Meta-analytic Review.Personality Psychology.
  80. Tett. R. P.,Jackson. D. N.,Rothstein, M.,Roddon. J. R.(1994).Mcta-analvsis of Personality-Job Performance Relations: A Reply to Ones, Mount, Barrick and Hunter.Personality Psychology.
  81. Thorns, P.,Moore, K. S.,Scott, K. S.(1996).The Relationship between Self-efficacy for Participating in Self-managed Work Groups and the Big Five Personality Dimensions.Journal of Organizational Behavior.
  82. Tsai, W.,Ghoshal, S.(1998).Social Capital and Value Creation: The Role of Intrafirm Networks.Academy of Management Journal.
  83. Waston, D.(1971).Reinforcement Theory of Personality and Social Systems: Dominance and Position in a Group Power Structure.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
  84. Waston, D.,Tellegen, A.(1985).Toward a Consensual Structure of Mood.Psychological Bulletin.
  85. Williams, K. Y.,O`Reilly, C. A.,B. M. Staw,R. M. Sutton(1998).Demography and Diversity in Organizations: A Review of 40 Years of Research.Research in Organizational Behavior.
  86. Zander, A.,Forward, J.(1968).Position in Group, Achievement Motivation, and Group Aspiration.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
被引用次数
  1. 蔡維奇、紀乃文(2008)。團隊情感氛圍形成的前因、情境調節及個人層次後果變項之研究。組織與管理,1(1),1-37。
  2. 蔡政緯、張基成(2012)。以網路模糊德懷術與模糊層級分析法發展數位化學習歷程檔案之知識管理行為量表。教育資料與圖書館學,50(1),103-133。
  3. 岑淑筱、王俊元(2016)。創業家與經理人先備經驗、社會網絡、決策風格、辨識機會與競合關係相關性之研究─以旅行業與餐飲業為例。管理資訊計算,5(1),68-82。
  4. 陳美華、許銘珊(2010)。以五大人格理論探討學生喜愛之教師人格特質。休閒暨觀光產業研究,5(1/2),13-27。
  5. 胡宜中、易慧珍、王仁宏(2012)。運用網路程序分析法探討甄選管理師與工程師之關鍵人格特質─以C國營事業為例。人力資源管理學報,12(4),53-79。
  6. 許勝智、張昌吉(2012)。高科技產業研發人員人格特質對知識分享意願影響之研究以信任關係為中介變項。政大勞動學報,28,157-200。
  7. 黃荷婷、黃家齊(2006)。團隊成員目標導向對於自我與集體效能及創新之影響一個多層次研究。管理學報,23(3),327-346。
  8. 黃家齊、林億明(2006)。團隊導向人力資源管理活動及社會資本對團隊知識分享與創新之影響。臺大管理論叢,16(2),101-130。
  9. 黃家齊、王思峰(2008)。團隊知識轉換能力組合與知識分享、知識創造及創新績效—知識螺旋理論的新觀點驗證。組織與管理,1(1),39-72。
  10. 賴惠韻,曾欽正,張嘉雯(2020)。虛擬社群參與前置因素與價值創造之探討-以美妝網為例。中山管理評論,28(2),251-294。
  11. 藍毓莉,許經坦,張力(2021)。球員人格特質、教練領導行為與團隊凝聚力關係。慈濟科技大學學報,10期=總3,141-162。
  12. 林佩冠(2021)。志同道合,齊力斷金?-性格類聚的凝聚力對團體決策與團體迷思之影響。教育實踐與研究,34(2),41-82。
  13. 錢國倫、陳建丞、陳怡靜(2013)。工作與組織特性與求職者人格特質之交互作用對組織人才吸引力的影響。人力資源管理學報,13(1),1-32。
  14. 童惠欣、翁良杰(2017)。交換關係對於知識分享以及創造力影響之多層次研究:一個整合社會兩難困境與代理問題之分析。中山管理評論,25(1),177-218。
  15. 汪美伶(2009)。組織支持與市場導向人力資源管理活動對服務導向組織公民行為的影響。東吳經濟商學學報,64,57-92。
  16. 翁良杰、李怡靜(2015)。轉換型領導對群體成員知識分享影響之跨層次研究:社會兩難觀點之分析。商略學報,7(1),53-70。
  17. 葉豐銘、葉靜輝、陳明園(2018)。以策略觀點探討服務績效之多層次研究。商略學報,10(1),67-88。
  18. 張火燦、卓明德(2010)。團隊多元化是否能提升團隊創造力?團隊幽默感的干擾角色。中原企管評論,8(2),131-149。
  19. 鄭雯憶、汪美伶(2007)。組織支持與服務導向組織公民行為—服務氣候之干擾角色。人力資源管理學報,7(4),71-93。
  20. 周建亨,李家慧(2021)。A、B型人格特質與網路口碑之影響。行銷科學學報,17(1),45-66。